Mixing density impact

PS Up to 40% by weight of this material can be mixed in. Impact grades add toughness to the mix. Non-impact PS (crystal) tends to cause surface finish problems. Expanded PS (EPS) should be avoided as a foam because of its low bulk density. Testing shows considerable strength improvements at 10 to 40% levels of densified EPS. 

The impact, which the introduction of intermediate quantities can have on the relevance list, will be demonstrated in the following by one elegant example. Example 3 Mixing-Time Characteristics for Liquid Mixtures with Differences in Density and Viscosity. The mixing time 0 necessary to achieve a molecular homogeneity of a liquid mixture—normally measured by decolorizatiorr methods—depends, in material systems without differences in density and viscosity, on only four parameters stirrer diameter d, density p, kinematic viscosity v, rotational speed ti ... 

Diblock copolymers, especially those containing a block chemically identical to one of the blend components, are more effective than triblocks or graft copolymers. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that efficient compat-ibilisation can be achieved with multiblock copolymers [47], potentially for heterogeneous mixed blends. Miscibility of particular segments of the copolymer in one of the phases of the bend is required. Compatibilisers for blends consisting of mixtures of polyolefins are of major interest for recyclates. Random poly(ethylene-co-propylene) is an effective compatibiliser for LDPE-PP, HDPE-PP or LLDPE-PP blends. The impact performance of PE-PP was improved by the addition of very low density PE or elastomeric poly(styrene-block-(ethylene-co-butylene-l)-block styrene) triblock copolymers (SEBS) [52]. 

In essence, the test battery should include XRPD to characterize crystallinity of excipients, moisture analysis to confirm crystallinity and hydration state of excipients, bulk density to ensure reproducibility in the blending process, and particle size distribution to ensure consistent mixing and compaction of powder blends. Often three-point PSD limits are needed for excipients. Also, morphic forms of excipients should be clearly specified and controlled as changes may impact powder flow and compactibility of blends. XRPD, DSC, SEM, and FTIR spectroscopy techniques may often be applied to characterize and control polymorphic and hydrate composition critical to the function of the excipients. Additionally, moisture sorption studies, Raman mapping, surface area analysis, particle size analysis, and KF analysis may show whether excipients possess the desired polymorphic state and whether significant amounts of amorphous components are present. Together, these studies will ensure lotto-lot consistency in the physical properties that assure flow, compaction, minimal segregation, and compunction ability of excipients used in low-dose formulations. 

---