Minimal models optimization

Model optimization is a further refinement of the secondary and tertiary structure. At a minimum, a molecular mechanics energy minimization is done. Often, molecular dynamics or simulated annealing are used. These are frequently chosen to search the region of conformational space relatively close to the starting structure. For marginal cases, this step is very important and larger simulations should be run. 

In stochastic optimization, Cv can be purposefully employed to investigate, denote, and compare the relative uncertainty in models being studied. In a risk minimization model, as the expected value is reduced, the variability in the expected value (for example, as measured by variance or standard deviation) is reduced. The ratio of this change can be captured and described by Cv. Consequently, a comparison of the relative merit of models in terms of their robustness can be represented by their respective values of Cv, in the sense that a model with a lower Cv is favored since there is less uncertainty associated with it. In fact, Markowitz (1952) advocates that the use of Cy as a measure of risk would equally ensure that the outcome of a decisionmaking process still lies in the set of efficient portfolios for the case of operational investments. 

The real power in the multi-coefficient models, however, derives from the potential for the coefficients to make up for more severe approximations in the quantities used for (/) in Eq. (7.62). At present, Truhlar and co-workers have codified some 20 different multicoefficient models, some of which they term minimal , meaning that relatively few terms enter into analogs of Eq. (7.62), and in particular the optimized coefficients absorb the spin-orbit and core-correlation terms, so they are not separately estimated. Different models can thus be chosen for an individual problem based on error tolerance, resource constraints, need to optimize TS geometries at levels beyond MP2, etc. Moreover, for some of the minimal models, analytic derivatives are available on a term-by-term basis, meaning that analytic derivatives for the composite energy can be computed simply as the sum over tenns. 

The model was built and optimized in the absence of inhibitors. Dipeptide inhibitors were docked in the energy-minimized model. The coordinates of the... 

The model was built and optimized in the absence of inhibitors. Dipeptide inhibitors were docked in the eneigy-minimized model. The coordinates of the slowly hydrolyzed substrate glycyl-L-tyrosine [114] for CPA were used to guide the (manual) docking. Atomic coordinates were obtained from the Protein Data Bank [115], Energy minimization and molecular dynamics were carried out with GROMOS [116]. 

Practically, one often compares the conformation of a protein under two or more conditions. In that case, the difference of the protection factors for the two or more conditions is also minimized during the model optimization. As a result, the difference in protection factors of the two conditions only becomes visible when the differences are statistically significant (Figure 7.7). Taking antistreptavidin lgG2 as an example, the regions of the antibody heavy chain that are destabilized (decreased protection factors) by reduction of interchain disulfide bonds are clearly visible in the differential protection factor plot shown in Figure 7.7b. 

ABSTRACT This work proposes a robust optimization criterion of mechanical parameters in the design of linear Tuned Mass Dampers (TMD) located at the top of a main structural system subject to random base accelerations. The dynamic input is modelled as a stationary filtered white noise random process. The aim is to properly consider non-uniform spectral contents that happen in many real physical vibration phenomena. The main structural system is described as a single linear degree of freedom, and it is assumed that uncertainty affects the system model. The problem parameters treated are described as random uncorrelated variables known only by the estimation of their means and variances. Robustness is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem in which both the mean and variance of a conventional objective function (OF) are minimized simultaneously. Optimal Pareto fronts are obtained and results show a significant improvement in performance stability compared to a standard conventional solution. 

Cobelli, C. and Thomaseth, K. 1987. The minimal model of glucose disappearance optimal input studies. Math. Biosci. 83 127-155. 

Energy minimized models may be further optimized by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, as reported in-depth in section 2.3. 

Based on a literature review of ANP, SNAP, LLNL studies and SP-100, as well as quantum mechanical modeling, LiH swelling under mixed neutron and gamma radiation may be minimized by optimizing fabrication techniques. The most promising methods are ... 

---