Military bearing

FIG. 7-1 (D) Military-bearing posture. (E) Anterior postural deviation. (F) Posterior postural deviation. (G) Rotary posture. 

In other useful appHcations, siHcon nitride bearings have been found to offer exceUent performance siHcon nitride cutting tool inserts are a commercial product wear parts such as sand blast nozzles, seals, and die liners are also commercially produced the superior performance of heat exchangers has been demonstrated and there are also military appHcations. 

Despite this past downward trend, which has persisted in the United States since 1979 with modernization of large suppHers in Japan and Europe, growth of 2 to 2.5% is now expected into the mid-1990s. This reflects increased demand for some military appHcations and commercial aircraft, plus growing needs for farm and constmction machinery (2). U.S. production of the relatively new ceramic ball bearings is expected to increase distinctively by about 50% yearly to reach 17 million in 1993 (3). 

Cleaning SCF s such as CO2 can be used to clean and degrease quartz rods utihzed to produce optical fibers, products employed in the fabrication of printed-circuit boards, oily chips from machining operations, precision bearings in military applications, and so on. Research is in progress for removing residues in etch/ash processes in m icroelectronics. 

Given the widespread use of JP-8 in the military and aviation industry, concern about occupational exposure of women of child-bearing age has emerged as this workforce continues to expand. Furthermore, accidental spills associated with pipelines or storage facilities can contaminate soil or water, posing unpredictable health risks to nearby residential areas. Taken together, these concerns provide adequate basis to investigate the developmental toxicity of JP-8. 

This decision continues in the tradition of the keeping of arms being an individual right, but one exercised in the context of promoting a collective defense (the well-trained militia). The state s police power can prohibit weapons that are not suitable or customary for this purpose. The keeping of military weapons cannot be banned, but the manner of bearing them can be regulated. 

The defendant argued that his conviction violated his right to keep and bear arms under the Kansas Constitution, which states The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power. ... 

In U.S. V. Miller the Supreme Court rejects an appeal by stating that it had been given no evidence that a sawed-off shotgun was suitable for use in a militia, and because it is not, carrying it would not be protected by the Second Amendment. Because the decision also implied an individual right to bear military-type arms, it would be cited by both supporters and opponents of gun control. 

Massachusetts The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defence [sic]. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it. (Declaration of Rights, Part I, Article XVII)... 

Vermont That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves and the State—and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power. (Chapter I, Article XVI)... 

Virginia That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. (Article I, Section 13)... 

The signification attributed to the term Militia appears from the debates in the Convention, the history and legislation of Colonies and States, and the writings of approved commentators. These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline. And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time. 

The best evidence that bear arms was primarily used to refer to military situations comes from Aymette v. State, 2 Humph., Tenn. 154 (1840), a prosecution for carrying a concealed bowie knife. The Supreme Court of Tennessee, in construing section 26 of its declaration of rights, providing that the free white men of this State have a right to keep and bear arms for their common defence, stated ... 

The 28th section of our bill of rights provides that no citizen of this State shall be compelled to bear arms provided he will pay an equivalent, to be ascertained by law. Here we know that the phrase has a military sense, and no other and we must infer that it is used in the same way in the 26th section, which secures to the citizen the right to bear arms. A man in pursuit of deer, elk, and buffaloes might carry his rifle every day for forty years, and yet it would never be said of him that he had borne arms.. . ... 

---