Microporous carbons formation

The adsorption isotherms are often Langmuirian in type (under conditions such that multilayer formation is not likely), and in the case of zeolites, both n and b vary with the cation present. At higher pressures, capillary condensation typically occurs, as discussed in the next section. Some N2 isotherms for M41S materials are shown in Fig. XVII-27 they are Langmuirian below P/P of about 0.2. In the case of a microporous carbon (prepared by carbonizing olive pits), the isotherms for He at 4.2 K and for N2 at 77 K were similar and Langmuirlike up to P/P near unity, but were fit to a modified Dubninin-Radushkevich (DR) equation (see Eq. XVII-75) to estimate micropore sizes around 40 A [186]. 

The boiling point of the monomer is 293.8 K, whereas paraldehyde has a cyclic structure and its boiling temperature is 397 K. As paraldehyde is more condensable, paraldehyde molecules can be adsorbed even on the surface where monomer cannot be adsorbed. Therefore, introduction of strong acid sites on the microporous carbon should enhance the amount of adsorption due to paraldehyde formation. 

In previous sections, it was explained how different precursors can be used to produce activated carbons and the type of porosity developed depending on the type of activation method applied. Thus, thermal activation imrmally yields adsorbents with a medium to liigh adsorption capacity, a medium micropore size distribution and no mesopore formation (except in the case of high bum-off ratios, where micropores may be of a large size). Phosphoric acid activation yields a carbon with a higher adsorption capacity than thermal activation and a wider micropore size distribution (even in the low mesopore range), whereas KOH yields extremely narrow microporous carbons. 

Figure 2.59. Lattice-fringe images (from (002) difbaction band) for graphite after grinding in a shear-type interaction for 40 h. The formation of microporous carbon is irreversible (Salver-Disma ef a/., 1999).

Figure 3.25. (c, d) A simple schematic to demonstrate, for microporous carbons of surface area of < 1000 m g that the volume elements of carbon and of porosity are NOT essentially interchangeable but that the shape format of the porosity must be linked to the shape format of the carbon volume elements. In Figure 2.25(c), the black of the carbon elements becomes the white of the porosity in Figure 3.25(d). 

The use of polystyrene-based materials has also been investigated for porous carbon formation with the hard template method using amorphous silica gel, mesoporous alumina, and microporous zeolites as inorganic templates [90]. 

Figure 5.19 shows an idealized form of the adsorption isotherm for physisorption on a nonporous or macroporous solid. At low pressures the surface is only partially occupied by the gas, until at higher pressures (point B on the curve) the monolayer is filled and the isotherm reaches a plateau. This part of the isotherm, from zero pressures to the point B, is equivalent to the Langmuir isotherm. At higher pressures a second layer starts to form, followed by unrestricted multilayer formation, which is in fact equivalent to condensation, i.e. formation of a liquid layer. In the jargon of physisorption (approved by lUPAC) this is a Type II adsorption isotherm. If a system contains predominantly micropores, i.e. a zeolite or an ultrahigh surface area carbon (>1000 m g ), multilayer formation is limited by the size of the pores. 

Although cracking also occurs on chlorine-treated clays and amorphous silica-aluminas, the application of zeolites has resulted in a significant improvement in gasoline yield. The finite size of the zeolite micropores prohibits the formation of large condensed aromatic molecules. This beneficial shape-selectivity improves the carbon efficiency of the process and also the lifetime of the catalyst. 

The total surface area of the template carbons prepared by sucrose impregnation is significantly higher than the surface area of the corresponding silica template (Table 2), that confirms the formation of micropores during the carbonization. Just an opposite tendency is observed... 

All preparations were structurally characterized by means of XRD (Siemens 5005). TEM imaging was performed with a Philips CM200 instrument. 27A1 and 29Si MAS NMR (Broker 500 MFlz and 360 MFlz respectively) was used to study the microporous phase and the kinetic of its formation. The relaxation delays were 0.2s and 200s respectively. Acidity was determined by the adsorption of carbon monoxide after activating the samples in vacuum (10 6 mbar) at 450°C for 1 h. The spectra were recorded on a Equinox 55 Broker spectrometer with a resolution of 2 cm 1 and normalized to 10 mg of sample. 

---