Membranes pressure distribution

A second application of IMRs consists of using the membrane to distribute a reactant to a fixed bed of catalyst packed on the opposite side (see Figure 10.21c). The most frequent case corresponds to a series-parallel reaction network where there is a favorable kinetic effect regarding the partial pressure of the distributed reactant. Thus, IMRs have been used successfully as oxygen distributors in many oxidations where not only greater selectivity with respect to conventional arrangements is obtained but also a safer operation where a reduced formation of hot spots, lower probability of runaway, and catalyst life enhancement are achieved. 

Enzymatic systems in which membranes are simply used as separation media and not as catalyst carriers are traditionally called "enzyme membrane reactors" (EMR). Concentration polarization phenomena severely affect the performance of such reactors so that it is necessary to control the polarization layer onto membrane pressurized side by means of reactor fluid dynamics or design tricks. Fluid dynamic conditions in some of these reactors make them especially suitable for enzymatic systems for which a homogeneous catalyst distribution is particularly important, such as cofactor-requiring mono- and multi-enzyme systems. 

For small curvatures, Eq. (6.15) shows that the curvature energy of a thin film is characterized by the three parameters k, k, and cq. The qualitative behavior of any system, including such properties such as the equilibrium shape, magnitude of thermal fluctuations, and any phase transitions, can of course be calculated as a function of these constants. However, the physics of the system can be radically different depending on the physical parameters e.g., a change in cq can induce shape changes in the system. It is thus of interest to relate the bending elastic moduli and the spontaneous curvature to the physics of the particular system of interest. This section first shows how these parameters are related to the pressure distribution in the membrane and then presents a simple but instructive microscopic model that relates k, and Co to more molecular properties. 

Figure 5.25 Effect of the membrane permeability on the pressure distribution, (a) Pressure distribution, averaged over interparticle space along the angular coordinate (b) distribution of average pressure along the reactor length.

Influence of Emulsifier Concentration Emulsions of small droplet sizes and narrow droplet size distributions can be obtained at high emulsifier concentration. Figure 13.12 shows the volume density distributions of emulsions of a disperse phase fraction of cp = 72% and two different emulsifier (Tween 80) concentrations, 2.4% and 4.6%. The production parameters were trans-membrane pressure difference of 12 bar, three passes and membrane mean pore size of 0.8 pm. In both cases the emulsifier concentration is above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). 

In some lUPAC-sponsored researchf, samples of the same polystyrene preparation were distributed among different laboratories for characterization. The following molecular weights were obtained for one particular sample by osmotic pressure experiments using the solvents, membranes, and temperatures listed below ... 

Specifications for gas turbine fuels prescribe test limits that must be met by the refiner who manufactures fuel however, it is customary for fuel users to define quality control limits for fuel at the point of delivery or of custody transfer. These limits must be met by third parties who distribute and handle fuels on or near the airport. Tests on receipt at airport depots include appearance, distfllation, flash point (or vapor pressure), density, freezing point, smoke point, corrosion, existing gum, water reaction, and water separation. Tests on delivery to the aircraft include appearance, particulates, membrane color, free water, and electrical conductivity. 

When pressure reaches 6-7 bars the cake is presqueezed for even distribution by pumping water to the backside of the membranes. 

The authors provide selection criteria, by which the suitability of a process for a distributed production can be assessed [139]. These are explicitly given for the categories of feedstock, processes, customer products, and waste products. This is completed by a list of suitable device types for distributed production such as plate heat exchangers, pressure and temperature swing units, electrostatic dispersers, and membrane units. The various operations often rely on the use of electricity and therefore are said to be particularly suited for operation at the mini scale. 

---