Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

MEAD model

In the MEAD-model approximation, one supposes that components of AC, arising from the presence of formal or partial charges on Ae solute atoms can be approximated by the reaction-field methods of Continuum Solvation, and that the remaining nonpolar part of AG g, can either be neglected or approximated by a simple model such as proportionality to surface area. One then has ... [Pg.1543]

There are two basic types of unconstrained optimization algorithms (I) those reqmring function derivatives and (2) those that do not. The nonderivative methods are of interest in optimization applications because these methods can be readily adapted to the case in which experiments are carried out directly on the process. In such cases, an ac tual process measurement (such as yield) can be the objec tive function, and no mathematical model for the process is required. Methods that do not reqmre derivatives are called direc t methods and include sequential simplex (Nelder-Meade) and Powell s method. The sequential simplex method is quite satisfac tory for optimization with two or three independent variables, is simple to understand, and is fairly easy to execute. Powell s method is more efficient than the simplex method and is based on the concept of conjugate search directions. [Pg.744]

Belton Road West, Loughborough Leicestershire LEll OTR Digital Panel Meter - Model 2751-K Dlgltron Instrumentation Mead Lane, Hertford Hertforshire SG13 7AW... [Pg.452]

To offer more flexibility we adopt an approach, based on the transient simulation model TRNSYS (Klein et al., 1976), making use of the Lund DST borehole model (Hellstrom, 1989). The parameter estimation procedure is carried out using the GenOPT (Wetter, 2004) package with the Nelder and Mead Simplex minimization algorithm (Nelder and Mead, 1965) or Hooke and Jeeves minimization algorithm (Hooke and Jeeves, 1961). [Pg.185]

Cotton paper (100%) obtained from Mead Corporation in South Lee, Massachusetts, was pulped at Krofta Engineering Corporation (KEC), Lenox, MA.59 A known amount of pulp was suspended in tap water to determine the percent recovery by a circular DAF cell (Model Supracell Type 3 diameter = 0.91 m [3 ft] depth = 55.88 cm [22 in.] flow = 45L/min [12gal/min]). The initial total... [Pg.904]

Meade, B.J. andWoolhiser, M., Murine models for natural rubber latex allergy assessment, Methods, 27, 63, 2002. [Pg.589]

In a simplified form Eq. (ii) was used, decades ago, to assess metal ion adsorption to surfaces, by plotting log ([Meads] / [Me2+]) vs pH. (Kurbatov et al., 1951). The slope of this curve gives an idea on n. The model for this "Kurbatov-plot" assumes that the adsorbent =S is present in large excess and that the adsorption at constant pH is not affected by surface charge. Fig. 2.11 gives an example for the binding of metal ions to amorphous Si02. [Pg.34]

Bowler BE, Meade TJ, Mayo SL, Richards JH, Gray HB (1989) J Am Chem Soc 111 8757 Lieber CM, Karas JL, Mayo SL, Albin M, Gray HB (1987) Proceedings of the Robert A. Welch Conference on Chemical Research. Design of Enzymes and Enzyme Models, Nov. 2-4, 1987, p 9, Robert A. Welch Foundation, Houston, TX... [Pg.128]

Monte Carlo method, 210, 21 propagation, 210, 28] Gauss-Newton method, 210, 11 Marquardt method, 210, 16 Nelder-Mead simplex method, 210, 18 performance methods, 210, 9 sample analysis, 210, 29 steepest descent method, 210, 15) simultaneous [free energy of site-specific DNA-protein interactions, 210, 471 for model testing, 210, 463 for parameter estimation, 210, 463 separate analysis of individual experiments, 210, 475 for testing linear extrapolation model for protein unfolding, 210, 465. [Pg.417]

Woodroffe R, Yao G, Meads C, Bayliss S, Ready A, Raftery J, Taylor R. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation a systematic review and modelling study. Health Technol Assess 2005 9(21) 1-194. [Pg.470]

In accordance with the above discussion, most of the damage encountered in DNA model systems (Mead et al. 1975 Kondo et al. 1988a,b, 1989, 1990) and in DNA (Fuciarelli et al. 1995) is due to OH reactions. Interestingly, ultrasound of... [Pg.16]

Kruse S, McNutt M, Phipps-Morgan J, Royden L, Wernicke B (1991) Lithospheric extension near Lake Mead, Nevada - A model for ductile flow in the lower crust. J Geophys Res 96(B8) 4435-4456 Kutzbach JE, Guetter PJ, Ruddiman WF, Prell WL (1989) Sensitivity of climate to late Cenozoic uplift in Southern Asia and the American West Numerical experiments. J Geophys Res 94 18,393-18,407 Kutzbach JE, Prell WL, Ruddiman WF (1993) Sensitivity of Eurasian climate to surface uplift of the Tibetan Plateau. J Geol 101 177-190... [Pg.18]

As discussed in section 7.1.6.4, semidilute solutions of rodlike polymers can be expected to follow the stress-optical rule as long as the concentration is sufficiently below the onset of the isotropic to nematic transition. Certainly, once such a system becomes nematic and anisotropic, the stress-optical rule cannot be expected to apply. This problem was studied in detail using an instrument capable of combined stress and birefringence measurements by Mead and Larson [109] on solutions of poly(y benzyl L-glutamate) in m-cresol. A pretransitional increase in the stress-optical coefficient was observed as the concentration approached the transition to a nematic state, in agreement of calculations based on the Doi model of polymer liquid crystals [63]. In addition to a dependence on concentration, the stress-optical coefficient was also seen to be dependent on shear rate, and on time for transient shear flows. [Pg.195]

The different mixing rules and nomenclature used are described in table 1. The simplex algorithm modified by Nelder-Mead (10) is used to fit the model parameter to experimental solubility. [Pg.352]

Table 9.1 The largest 25 rivers (in order of decreasing annual discharge Meade 1996 Milliman and Meade 1983), river watershed areas, river discharge estimates, and NEWS-model-estimated DIN, DON, PN, and TN (Total exports from the 25 largest rivers and the percent of total global export for which these rivers account are also shown, Tg = 10 g)... Table 9.1 The largest 25 rivers (in order of decreasing annual discharge Meade 1996 Milliman and Meade 1983), river watershed areas, river discharge estimates, and NEWS-model-estimated DIN, DON, PN, and TN (Total exports from the 25 largest rivers and the percent of total global export for which these rivers account are also shown, Tg = 10 g)...
The isotherm parameters were determined using Nelder Mead simplex method by minimizing the sum of residual, namely, the differences between experimental and estimated adsorption amount. Figure 2 showed the adsorption isotherms of TCE on MCM-48 at 303, 308, 313, 323 K. As one can be expected, the adsorption capacity was decreased with increasing temperature. The hybrid isotherm model for a pure adsorbate was found to fit the individual isotherm data very well. The parameters of the hybrid equations are listed in Table 1. [Pg.592]

Many methods are available for least-squares calculations. Models linear in 6 allow direct solutions other models need iteration. The choice of iteration method depends on one s goal. For a mere curve-fit of the data, a direct search procedure such as that of Powell (1965) or of Nelder and Mead (1965) may suffice. But to determine the most important parameters and their most probable values, a method based on derivatives of S 0) is essential and is followed here. [Pg.98]

Figure 11. The reduction potential of the Cu(Im)2(SCH3)(S(CH3)2)" complex as a function of the size of the protein (1.5 or 3.0 nm radius) and the distance between the copper ion and the centre of the protein [45]. The protein was modelled by a sphere of a low dielectric constant (4) surrounded by water (e = 78.39), and the copper site as a collection of point-charges taken from quantum chemical calculations. The potentials were calculated with the MEAD program. Figure 11. The reduction potential of the Cu(Im)2(SCH3)(S(CH3)2)" complex as a function of the size of the protein (1.5 or 3.0 nm radius) and the distance between the copper ion and the centre of the protein [45]. The protein was modelled by a sphere of a low dielectric constant (4) surrounded by water (e = 78.39), and the copper site as a collection of point-charges taken from quantum chemical calculations. The potentials were calculated with the MEAD program.
First theoretical interpretations of Me UPD by Rogers [3.7, 3.12], Nicholson [3.209, 3.210], and Schmidt [3.45] were based on an idealized adsorption model already developed by Herzfeld [3.211]. Later, Schmidt [3.54] used Guggenheim s interphase concept" [3.212, 3.213] to describe the thermodynamics of Me UPD processes. Schmidt, Lorenz, Staikov et al. [3.48, 3.57, 3.89-3.94, 3.100, 3.214, 3.215] and Schultze et al. [3.116-3.120, 3.216] used classical concepts to explain the kinetics of Me UPD and UPD-OPD transition processes including charge transfer, Meloiy bulk diffusion, and nucleation and growth phenomena. First and higher order phase transitions, which can participate in 2D Meads phase formation processes, were discussed controversially by various authors [3.36, 3.83, 3.84, 3.92-3.94, 3.98, 3.101, 3.110-3.114, 3.117-3.120, 3.217-3.225]. [Pg.42]

The formation of 2D Meads phases on a foreign substrate, S, in the underpotential range can be well described considering the substrate-electrolyte interface as an ideally polarizable electrode as shown in Section 8.2. In this case, only sorption processes of electrolyte constituents, but no Faradaic redox reactions or Me-S alloy formation processes are allowed to occur, The electrochemical double layer at the interface can be thermodynamically considered as a separate interphase [3.54, 3.212, 3.213]. This interphase comprises regions of the substrate and of the electrolyte with gradients of intensive system parameters such as chemical potentials of ions and electrons, electric potentials, etc., and contains all adsorbates and all surface energy. Furthermore, it is assumed that the chemical potential //Meads is a definite function of the Meads surface concentration, F, and the electrode potential, E, at constant temperature and pressure Meads (7", ). Such a model system can only be... [Pg.43]


See other pages where MEAD model is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.363]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.1543 ]




SEARCH



Meade

Meads

© 2024 chempedia.info