Maximum packing

Apart from chemical composition, an important variable in the description of emulsions is the volume fraction, outer phase. For spherical droplets, of radius a, the volume fraction is given by the number density, n, times the spherical volume, 0 = Ava nl2>. It is easy to show that the maximum packing fraction of spheres is 0 = 0.74 (see Problem XIV-2). Many physical properties of emulsions can be characterized by their volume fraction. The viscosity of a dilute suspension of rigid spheres is an example where the Einstein limiting law is [2]... 

Samples can be concentrated beyond tire glass transition. If tliis is done quickly enough to prevent crystallization, tliis ultimately leads to a random close-packed stmcture, witli a volume fraction (j) 0.64. Close-packed stmctures, such as fee, have a maximum packing density of (]) p = 0.74. The crystallization kinetics are strongly concentration dependent. The nucleation rate is fastest near tire melting concentration. On increasing concentration, tire nucleation process is arrested. This has been found to occur at tire glass transition [82]. 

For large amounts of fillers, the maximum theoretical loading with known filler particle size distributions can be estimated. This method (8) assumes efficient packing, ie, the voids between particles are occupied by smaller particles and the voids between the smaller particles are occupied by stiH smaller particles. Thus a very wide filler psd results in a minimum void volume or maximum packing. To get from maximum packing to maximum loading, it is only necessary to express the maximum loading in terms of the minimum amount of binder that fills the interstitial voids and becomes adsorbed on the surface of the filler. 

DpopE related to SpQpp, which is in turn related to the closeness of packing of the powder. The number of particles adjacent to a given particle is represented by The maximum packing density for monosize spheres occurs at hexagonal close packing, where = 12 and = 0.2595 for... 

This fitted the data well up to volume fractions of 0.55 and was so successful that theoretical considerations were tested against it. However, as the volume fraction increased further, particle-particle contacts increased until the suspension became immobile, giving three-dimensional contact throughout the system flow became impossible and the viscosity tended to infinity (Fig. 2). The point at which this occurs is the maximum packing fraction, w, which varies according to the shear rate and the different types of packings. An empirical equation that takes the above situation into account is given by [23] ... 

The bulk density of a powder is calculated by dividing its mass by the volume occupied by the powder (Abdullah Geldart, 1999). Tapped bulk density, or simply tapped density, is the maximum packing density of a powder achieved under the influence of well-defined, externally applied forces (Oliveira et al., 2010). Because the volume includes the spaces between particles as well as the envelope volumes of the particles themselves, the bulk and tapped density of a powder are highly dependent on how the particles are packed. This fact is related to the morphology of its particles and such parameters are able to predict the powder flow properties and its compressibility. 

Aluminum composites. See also Aluminum-filled composites maximum packing fraction of, 70 25-26 spatial charge carriers in, 70 22 weight gain during relative humidity aging, 70 24... 

Maximum outlet temperature, 13 253 Maximum packing fraction (MPF), 10 25-26... 

The results of Equation (3.56) are plotted in Figure 3.14. It can be seen that shear thinning will become apparent experimentally at (p > 0.3 and that at values of q> > 0.5 no zero shear viscosity will be accessible. This means that solid-like behaviour should be observed with shear melting of the structure once the yield stress has been exceeded with a stress controlled instrument, or a critical strain if the instrumentation is a controlled strain rheometer. The most recent data24,25 on model systems of nearly hard spheres gives values of maximum packing close to those used in Equation (3.56). 

The intrinsic viscosity is the Einstein value [rj] = 2.5 and the packing fraction cpm(0) is that in the low shear limit. As the volume fraction approaches the maximum packing fraction, the viscosity rapidly... 

Figure 6.7 Plot of the stress-dependent packing fraction

The final density of the compact is less than the maximum packing fraction of the particles, PF ax [cf. Eqs. (4.8) and (4.67)], due to frictional forces at particle contacts that retard particle sliding The effectiveness of the compaction process is quantified... 

Oil absorption is a very simple technique which when carefully applied can give a useful guide to the packing ability of fillers [83]. This determines the amount of a selected oil that is needed to just form a continuous phase between the filler particles when they are subjected to a certain mixing procedure. This is a good guide to the maximum packing fraction of filler that is likely to be achievable in a polymer matrix, especially if the oil used is chosen to have a similar polarity to that of the polymer to be used. 

Fig. 20. Dependence of the maximum packing fraction on the specific surface area of the filler in PP/CaC03 composites...

A large number of empirical modifications to this expression have been proposed which model the viscosity of a liquid containing moderate concentrations of spherical particles [5] These include Mooney [6], Maron-Pierce [7] and Krieger-Dougherty [8] expressions which take into account the maximum packing fraction of the particles, and where interaction effects are absent, and can be represented by the general form ... 

Under CP VC conditions, the pigment particles are at a maximum packing density, and the interstices are completely filled with binder. With smaller amounts of binder, the interstices are incompletely filled. The CPVC thus represents a pigment concentration boundary at which abrupt changes in the properties of the film occur. 

In these Equations, G is the modulus of the syntactic foam, G0 is the modulus of the polymer matrix, v0 is Poisson s ratio of the polymer matrix, and 9 is the maximum packing fraction of the filler phase. For uniform spheres, 9 0.64 (see Sect. 3.6). The volume fraction of spheres in the syntactic foam is 9sph. The slope of the G/G0 vs. 9sph curve depends strongly upon whether or not G/G0 is greater or less than 1.0. The slope is negative if the apparent modulus of the hollow spheres is less than the modulus of the polymer matrix. 

---