Maximum likelihood estimation, defined

Although it sounds reasonable to use the maximum likelihood to define our esfimafe of the displacement, there are two questions that remain. Firstly, what is the variance of the error associated with this estimate This defines N which was used in Eq. 22 fo defermine fhe error in fhe wavefront reconstruction. Secondly, is it possible to do better than the centroid In other words is it optimal ... 

Figure 7. The variance in the slope estimate versus aperture size for the centroid and maximum likelihood estimators for turbulence defined by ro = 0.25.

The optimal parameter p can be found by maximum-likelihood estimation, but even the optimal p will not guarantee that the Box—Cox transformed values are symmetric. Note that all these transformations are only defined for positive data values. In case of negative values, a constant has to be added to make them positive. Within R, the Box—Cox transformation can be performed to data of a vector Jt as follows ... 

The parameter estimation for the mixture model (Equation 5.25) is based on maximum likelihood estimation. The likelihood function L is defined as the product of the densities for the objects, i.e.,... 

Maximum likelihood estimates of 0 are defined to maximize the like lihood... 

Nonparametric analysis provides powerful results since the rehahility calculation is unconstrained to fit any particular pre-defined lifetime distribution. However, this flexibility makes nonparametric results neither easy nor convenient to use for different purposes as often encountered in engineering design (e.g., optimization). In addition, some trends and patterns are more clearly identified and recognizable with parametric analysis. Several possible methods can be used to fit a parametric distribution to the nonparametric estimated rehability functions (as provided by the Kaplan-Meier estimator), such as graphical procedures or inference procedures. See Lawless (2003) for details. We choose in this paper the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) technique, assuming that the sateUite subsystems failure data are arising from a WeibuU piobabihly distribution, as expressed in Equations 1,2. 

We propose an iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator heuristic for the estimation of the parameters. The objective of this study is to analyze the convergence of our algorithm as a function of the sample size of the database. The Mean Squared Error is used as the performance criteria. We consider that the database is constructed from periodic inspections at a fixed time step Ton independent but identical structures. Two values define the size of the database N the number of inspected structures n and the number of inspections carried out on each one of these structures T. 

In this chapter a maximum likelihood approach is chosen, and an EM-algorithm is applied to estimate the classification indexes and the Gaussian parameters describing each class. The maximum likelihood estimates are derived by maximizing /(a c,/r, A) in (2) with respect to c, m and S. The estimates of each Mc and Sc are obtained through differentiation of (2) with respect to these parameters, and setting the derivatives equal to zero. It can be shown that the solution to these equations are the expressions in (4) and (5), with replaced by c, defined as c = k, Cfc = c, i.e., the set of all voxel positions k with classification index c. Thus, the estimators fic and Sc depends on the unknown classification indexes of the complete set of voxels . The maximum likelihood estimator for Ck is given as... 

If this criterion is based on the maximum-likelihood principle, it leads to those parameter values that make the experimental observations appear most likely when taken as a whole. The likelihood function is defined as the joint probability of the observed values of the variables for any set of true values of the variables, model parameters, and error variances. The best estimates of the model parameters and of the true values of the measured variables are those which maximize this likelihood function with a normal distribution assumed for the experimental errors. 

Maximum likelihood method The estimate of a parameter 9, based on a random sample Xi, X2, , Xn, is that value of 9 which maximizes the likelihood function L(Xi, X2, , Xn, 9) which is defined as... 

Also in Section 3.2, several estimation procedures are defined, such as method of moments (MOM), maximum likelihood (ML), and least squares (LS). Criteria are reviewed that can be used to evaluate and compare alternative estimators. 

The most popular approach is supervised because a region of interest has to be defined in the background of the images in order to extract n samples. Afterward, the choice of the estimator depends on what kind of data is available. For complex images, the optimal maximum likelihood (ML) estimator of a2 is given by28... 

The best estimates for aj and 2 are the values that maximize PP(a, as) (method of maximum likelihood). Define ... 

Assuming that we have measured a series of concentrations over time/ we can define a model structure and obtain initial estimates of the model parameters. The objective is to determine an estimate of the parameters (CLe, Vd) such that the differences between the observed and predicted concentrations are comparatively small. Three of the most commonly used criteria for obtaining a best fit of the model to the data are ordinary least squares (OLS)/ weighted least squares (WLS)/ and extended least squares (ELS) ELS is a maximum likelihood procedure. These criteria are achieved by minimizing the following quantities/... 

For kriging models, the structure is defined by the set of independent variables selected - including quadratic terms - and the selection of the correlation model. The parameter estimation is performed by a maximum likelihood procedure. For neural nets, the activation function to be used is defined a priori. The structure is completed by the selection of the number of neurons in the hidden layer. A backpropagation procedure has been used for training. 

All the objective functions shown in Table 15.1 are derived from a least-squares regression approach as previously described, whereas the estimation method more commonly used in population pharmacokinetics and nonlinear mixed effect modeling in general is based on a maximum likelihood (ML) approach. ML is an alternative to the least-squares objective function it seeks to maximize the likelihood or log-likelihood function (or to minimize the negative log-likelihood function). In general terms, the likelihood function is defined as... 

---