Maximum effective efficiency

Consequently, as the diameter of a capillary column decreases, both maximum column efficiency N and maximum effective efficiency A es increase and are also dependent on the particular solute retention k. Retention in capillary GC is usually expressed as, the retention factor k, where... 

Total overall performance effectiveness indicates PTPM s pursuit of maximum plant efficiency and minimum downtime. 

This is the inlet into the system, and will be the single most important element in determining the effectiveness of the control plant. A study of the dust- or fume-producing process is necessary to ensure that the twin aims of effectiveness and efficiency are met. Hoods that totally enclose the process for maximum effectiveness may, however, prevent the operator from carrying out the process for which the control was needed in the first place. 

The log of the reciprocal of the bulk concentration of surfactant (C in mol/ L) necessary to produce a surface or interfacial pressure of 20 raN/m, log( 1 / On= 20 i e > a 20 mN/m reduction in the surface or interfacial tension, is considered a measure of the efficiency of a surfactant. The effectiveness of surface tension reduction is the maximum effect the surfactant can produce irrespective of concentration, (rccmc = [y]0 - y), where [y]0 is the surface tension of the pure solvent and y is the surface tension of the surfactant solution at its cmc. 

In any process such as the cycle of material the conversion of energy is to work, useful constructs is limited by thermodynamic reasoning to a maximum amount (not 100%). This maximum thermodynamic efficiency cannot be achieved by any machine working at a real speed and which operates under constraints. The resultant work output, we shall refer to as optimal insofar that waste is avoided. As the constraints in the ecosystem are often ill-defined the reader will observe a certain looseness in the use of the words efficiency and effectiveness (fitness) throughout this book (see Section 4.7 and Appendix 4C). 

Figure 7 Maximum lipofection efficiencies [RLU (lu/pg protein)] of the most effective lipoplexes of R-configurated KL-1-14 in a mixture with Choi in different Choi/ KL-1-14 ratios from 0.3 to 1.2 (counterion chloride) and the pCMVluc-plasmid (charge ratio 7 or 9). Each bar represents the mean ( S.D.) of three wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. Abbreviations. Choi, cholesterol DOPE, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine RLU, relative light units.

Other workers have studied the effects of varying current density and plating temperature on the hardness and current efficiency and have obtained similar observations (Tab. 6.6), namely that maximum current efficiency occurred at lower temperatures, higher current densities and in the absence of ultrasound (Tab. 6.6a), yet improved hardness occurred at the highest current density and in the presence of ultrasound but at lower plating temperatures (Tab. 6.6b). 

It is seen from figure 2 that changing the particle diameter from I to 20 micron results in an efficiency change from about 3500 theoretical plates to nearly 1.5 million theoretical plates and furthermore, this very high efficiency is achieved at an inlet pressure of only 3000 p.s.i.. It is also seen that the maximum available efficiency increases as the particle diameter increases. This is because, as already discussed, if the pressure is limited, in order to increase the column length to accommodate more theoretical plates the permeability of the column must be increased to allow the optimum mobile phase velocity to be realized. It is possible to increase the inlet pressure to some extent, but ultimately the pressure will be limited and the effect of particle diameter will be the same but at higher efficiency levels. 

Many investigators have actively studied the electrochemical reduction of C02 using various metal electrodes in organic solvents because these solvents dissolve much more C02 than water. With the exception of methanol, however, no hydrocarbons were obtained. The solubility of C02 in methanol is approximately 5 times that in water at ambient temperature, and 8-15 times that in water at temperatures below 0°C. Thus, studies of electrochemical reduction of C02 in methanol at —30°C have been conducted.148-150 In methanol-based electrolytes using Cs+ salts the main products were methane, ethane, ethylene, formic acid, and CO.151 This system is effective for the formation of C2 compounds, mainly ethylene. In the LiOH-methanol system, the efficiency of hydrogen formation, a competing reaction of C02 reduction, was depressed to below 2% at relatively negative potentials.152 The maximum current efficiency for hydrocarbon (methane and ethylene) formation was of 78%. 

---