Maximum effect concentration level

Nuclear magnetic resonance Maximum effect concentration level... 

The maximum allowable oxygen concentration (MAOC), which is, in general, 2 vol % below the LOC, has to include the following considerations fluc tuatiou in oxygen concentrations due to process and breakdown conditions per time and location, as well as the requirement for protective measures or emergency measures to become effective. In addition, a concentration level for an alarm has to be set below the MAOC. 

Modifiers can be used very effectively in on-line SFE-GC to determine the concentration levels of the respective analytes. This presents an advantage in terms of the use of modifiers in SFE, since they appear as solvent peaks in GC separations and do not interfere with the target analyte determination. Although online SFE-GC is a simple technique, its applicability to real-life samples is limited compared to off-line SFE-GC. As a result, on-line SFE-GC requires suitable sample selection and appropriate setting of extraction conditions. If the goal is to determine the profile or matrix composition of a sample, it is required to use the fluid at the maximum solubility. For trace analysis it is best to choose a condition that separates the analytes from the matrix without interference. However, present SFE-GC techniques are not useful for samples... 

Caribou in northern Quebec contained up to 1129 Bq 137Cs/kg muscle FW in 1986/87, but only 10 to 15% of this amount originated from Chernobyl the remainder is attributed to fallout from earlier atmospheric nuclear tests (Crete et al. 1990). The maximum concentration of 137Cs in meat of caribou (Rangifer tarandus granti) from the Alaskan Porcupine herd after the Chernobyl accident did not exceed 232 Bq/kg FW, and this is substantially below the recommended level of 2260 Bq 137Cs/kg FW (Allaye-Chan et al. 1990). Radiocesium transfer in an Alaskan lichen-reindeer-wolf (Canis lupus) food chain has been estimated. If reindeer forage contained 100 Bq/kg DW in lichens and 5 Bq/kg DW in vascular plants, the maximum winter concentrations — at an effective half-life of 8.2 years in lichens and 2.0 years in vascular plants — were estimated at 20 Bq/kg FW in reindeer-caribou skeletal muscle and 24 Bq/kg FW in wolf muscle (Holleman et al. 1990). 

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH) According to NIOSH (1997), the IDLH level .. . for the purpose of respirator selection represents a maximum concentration from which, in the event of respirator failure, one could escape within 30 minutes without experiencing any escapeimpairing or irreversible health effects. Concentrations are typically reported in parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m ). 

The measurement of very low levels of environmental pollutants is becoming increasingly important. The determination of lead, a cumulative toxin, is a good example. The current maximum allowable concentration of lead in British drinking water, before it enters the distribution network, is SO ng ml [29]. Although electrothermal atomization atomic-absorption spectrometry (AAS) can be used to measure this and lower concentrations, it is slow and requires considerable effort to ensure accurate results. Flames can provide simple and effective atom sources, but, if samples are aspirated directly, do not provide sufficient sensitivity. Thus, if a flame is to be used as the atom source, a preconcentration step is required. 

The toxicity requirements are established per type of industry, in terms of the maximum number of times the effluents needs to be diluted to produce a no observed effect concentration (NOEC), defined as Gf for fish, Gd for daphnia, Ga for algae, and G1 for luminescent bacteria. Testing is limited to the exposure to only the appropriate Gx level, which should not produce any observed effect [the G-value corresponds with the dilution of the effluent, expressed as the lowest dilution factor (1,2,4,...) causing less than 10% mortality]. The level of maximum allowable toxicity per industrial branch is based on the level that is considered to be attainable with state-of-the-art process and/or treatment technology. Violating the toxicity requirements results in a levy, which makes state-of-the-art compliance a more economic option [12]. 

---