Mass transport semi-infinite diffusion model

For all reactions, the mass transport regime is controlled by the diffusion of the reacting ligand only, as the mercury electrode serves as an inexhaustible source for mercury ions. Hence, with respect to the mathematical modeling, reactions (2.205) and (2.206) are identical. This also holds true for reactions (2.210) and (2.211). Furthermore, it is assumed that the electrode surface is covered by a sub-monomolecular film without interactions between the deposited particles. For reactions (2.207) and (2.209) the ligand adsorption obeys a linear adsorption isotherm. Assuming semi-infinite diffusion at a planar electrode, the general mathematical model is defined as follows ... 

Though in the general case, mathematical expressions of the Nernst model are more complicated than of those semi-infinite diffusion, stationary mass transport is described by a rather simple Eq. (3.12). In this connection, there occurs an interesting possibility to use superposition of both models, which is convenient to apply when i is the periodic time function. Perturbation signals of this type are considered in the theory of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. In this case, i(t)... 

As in the previous chapter, the semi-infinite diffusion at a planar electrode is considered, where the adsorption is described by a linear adsorption isotherm. The modeling of reaction (2.173) does not require a particular mathematical procedure. The model comprises equation (1.2) and the boundary conditions (2.148) to (2.152) that describe the mass transport and adsorption of the R form. In addition, the diffusion of the O form, affected by an irreversible follow-up chemical reaction, is described by the following equation ... 

Diffusion in Matrix. The transport equation for a semi-infinite medium of uniform initial concentration of mobile species, with the surface concentration equal to zero for time greater than zero, is given by Crank (13). The rate of mass transfer at the surface for this model is ... 

As the first approximation, impedance of a porous electrode can always be considered as a series combination of two processes—a mass-transport resistance inside the pores and impedance of electrochemical reactions inside the pores. De Levie was the first to develop a transmission line model to describe the frequency dispersion in porous electrodes in the absence of internal diffusion limitations [66]. De Levie s model is based on the assumption that the pores are cylindrical, of uniform diameter 2r and semi-infinite length /, not intercoimected, and homogeneously filled with electrolyte. The electrode material is assumed to have no resistance. Under these conditions, a pore behaves like a imiform RC transmission line. If a sinusoidal excitation is applied, the transmission line behavior causes the amplitude of the signal to decrease with the distance from the opening of the pore, and concentration and potential gradients may develop inside the pore. These assumptions imply that only a fraction of the pore is effectively taking part in the double-layer charging process. The RpQi i- [ohm] resistance to current in a porous electrode structure with number of pores n, filled with solution with resistivity p, is ... 

---