Packed columns mass transfer

To minimize the multiple path and mass transfer contributions to plate height (equations 12.23 and 12.26), the packing material should be of as small a diameter as is practical and loaded with a thin film of stationary phase (equation 12.25). Compared with capillary columns, which are discussed in the next section, packed columns can handle larger amounts of sample. Samples of 0.1-10 )J,L are routinely analyzed with a packed column. Column efficiencies are typically several hundred to 2000 plates/m, providing columns with 3000-10,000 theoretical plates. Assuming Wiax/Wiin is approximately 50, a packed column with 10,000 theoretical plates has a peak capacity (equation 12.18) of... 

Kovat s retention index (p. 575) liquid-solid adsorption chromatography (p. 590) longitudinal diffusion (p. 560) loop injector (p. 584) mass spectrum (p. 571) mass transfer (p. 561) micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (p. 606) micelle (p. 606) mobile phase (p. 546) normal-phase chromatography (p. 580) on-column injection (p. 568) open tubular column (p. 564) packed column (p. 564) peak capacity (p. 554)... 

To use all of these equations, the heights of the transfer units or the mass transfer coefficients and must be known. Transfer data for packed columns are often measured and reported direcdy in terms of and and correlated in this form against and... 

Experimental Mass Transfer Coefficients. Hundreds of papers have been pubHshed reporting mass transfer coefficients in packed columns. For some simple systems which have been studied quite extensively, mass transfer data may be obtained directiy from the Hterature (6). The situation with respect to the prediction of mass transfer coefficients for new systems is stiU poor. Despite the wealth of experimental and theoretical studies, no comprehensive theory has been developed, and most generalizations are based on empirical or semiempitical equations. 

Other correlations based partially on theoretical considerations but made to fit existing data also exist (71—75). A number of researchers have also attempted to separate from a by measuring the latter, sometimes in terms of the wetted area (76—78). Finally, a number of correlations for the mass transfer coefficient itself exist. These ate based on a mote fundamental theory of mass transfer in packed columns (79—82). Although certain predictions were verified by experimental evidence, these models often cannot serve as design basis because the equations contain the interfacial area as an independent variable. 

The situation is very much poorer for stmctured rather than random packings, in that hardly any data on Hq and have been pubHshed. Based on a mechanistic model for mass transfer, a way to estimate HETP values for stmctured packings in distillation columns has been proposed (91), yet there is a clear need for more experimental data in this area. 

Pulsed Columns. The efficiency of sieve-plate or packed columns is increased by the appHcation of sinusoidal pulsation to the contents of the column. The weU-distributed turbulence promotes dispersion and mass transfer while tending to reduce axial dispersion in comparison with the unpulsed column. This leads to a substantial reduction in HETS or HTU values. 

Gas Handling. The reactants are often gaseous under ambient conditions. To maximize the rate of the catalytic reaction, it is often necessary to minimize the resistance to gas—Uquid mass transfer, and the gases are therefore introduced as swarms of bubbles into a weU-stirred Hquid or into devices such as packed columns that faciHtate gas—Hquid mixing and gas absorption. 

Equipment Absorption, stripping, and distiUation operations are usually carried out in vertical, cylindrical columns or towers in which devices such as plates or packing elements are placed. The gas and liquid normally flow countercurrently, and the devices serve to provide the contacting and development of interfacial surface through which mass transfer takes place. Background material on this mass transfer process is given in Sec.. 5. 

Selection of Equipment Packed columns usually are chosen for very corrosive materials, for liquids that foam badly, for either small-or large-diameter towers involving veiy low allowable pressure drops, and for small-scale operations requiring diameters of less than 0.6 m (2 ft). The type of packing is selected on the basis of resistance to corrosion, mechanical strength, capacity for handling the required flows, mass-transfer efficiency, and cost. Economic factors are discussed later in this sec tion. 

In 1966, in a paper that now is considered a classic, Danckwerts and Gillham [Tmns. Inst. Chem. Eng., 44, T42 (1966)] showed that data taken in a small stirred-ceU laboratoiy apparatus could be used in the design of a packed-tower absorber when chemical reactions are involved. They showed that if the packed-tower mass-transfer coefficient in the absence of reaction (/cf) can be reproduced in the laboratory unit, then the rate of absorption in the l oratoiy apparatus will respond to chemical reactions in the same way as in the packed column even though the means of agitating the hquid in the two systems might be quite different. 

For total-reflux distillations carried out in packed columns, regions of loading and flooding are identified by their effects on mass-transfer efficiency, as shown in Fig. 14-47. Gas and liquid rate increase... 

Another type of distributor, not shown in Fig. 14-64, is the spray nozzle. It is usually not recommended for hquid distribution for two reasons. First, except for small columns, it is difficult to obtain a uniform spray pattern for the packing. The fuU-cone nozzle type is usually used, with the need for a bank of nozzles in larger columns. When there is more than one nozzle, the problem of overlap or underlap arises. A second reason for not using spray nozzles is their tendency toward entrainment by the gas, especially the smaller droplets in the spray size distribution. However, some mass transfer in the spray can be expected. 

Mass Transfer Relationships for calculating rates of mass transfer between gas and liquid in packed absorbers, strippers, and distillation columns may be found in Sec. 5 and are summarized in Table, 5-28. The two-resistance approach is used, with rates expressed as transfer units ... 

Mass Transfer Mass transfer in plate and packed gas-liquid contactors has been covered earHer in this subsection. Attention nere will be limited to deep-bed contactors (bubble columns and agitated vessels). Theory underlying mass transfer between phases is discussed in Sec. 5 of this handbook. 

Axial Dispersion Effects In adsorption bed calculations, axial dispersion effects are typically accounted for by the axial diffusionhke term in the bed conservation equations [Eqs. (16-51) and (16-52)]. For nearly linear isotherms (0.5 < R < 1.5), the combined effects of axial dispersion and mass-transfer resistances on the adsorption behavior of packed beds can be expressed approximately in terms of an apparent rate coefficient for use with a fluid-phase driving force (column 1, Table 16-12) ... 

Mass-Transfer Contact Section Where there is a strong possi-bihty that not all of the incoming vapors will be condensed in the pool, a direct-contact mass-transfer section is superimposed on the quench tank. This can be a baffle-tray section (as shown in Fig. 26-21) or a packed column sec tiou. 

The dispersion of a solute band in a packed column was originally treated comprehensively by Van Deemter et al. [4] who postulated that there were four first-order effect, spreading processes that were responsible for peak dispersion. These the authors designated as multi-path dispersion, longitudinal diffusion, resistance to mass transfer in the mobile phase and resistance to mass transfer in the stationary phase. Van Deemter derived an expression for the variance contribution of each dispersion process to the overall variance per unit length of the column. Consequently, as the individual dispersion processes can be assumed to be random and non-interacting, the total variance per unit length of the column was obtained from a sum of the individual variance contributions. 

---