Mass transfer effect for

Individual component efficiencies can vary as much as they do in this example only when the diffusion coefficients of the three binary pairs that exist in this system differ significantly For ideal or nearly ideal systems, all models lead to essentially the same results. This example demonstrates the importance of mass-transfer models for nonideal systems, especially when trace components are a concern. For further discussion of this example, see Doherty and Malone (op. cit.) and Baur et al. [AIChE J. 51,854 (2005)]. It is worth noting that there exists extensive experimental evidence for mass-transfer effects for this system, and it is known that nonequilibrium models accurately describe the behavior of this system, whereas equilibrium models (and equal-efficiency models) sometime... 

A theoretical analysis to evaluate quantitatively the mass transfer effects for a hyperbolic form of the intrinsic kinetics of a homogeneous catalytic reaction has been developed [16], assuming a gaseous reactant A, an organic liquid-phase reactant B and a homogeneous catalyst C. Two cases have to be considered ... 

In either case, mass transfer effects for both steps are restricted to the film and are unlikely to influence selectivity in a significant way. An interesting possibility is that an increase in the value of can lead to a situation where the first step continues in regime 3 but the second shifts to regime 2 and thus can occur only in the bulk. Because most of A would have been consumed in the film, its concentration in the bulk would be very low, thus severely restricting the second step. This will clearly result in an enhancement of selectivity for R. 

Figure 6.13 Mass transfer effectiveness for different microstructured reactors. Gas-phase, physical properties of air at 20 °C, 0.1 MPa.

The main conclusion to be drawn from these studies is that for most practical purposes the linear rate model provides an adequate approximation and the use of the more cumbersome and computationally time consuming diffusing models is generally not necessary. The Glueckauf approximation provides the required estimate of the effective mass transfer coefficient for a diffusion controlled system. More detailed analysis shows that when more than one mass transfer resistance is significant the overall rate coefficient may be estimated simply from the sum of the resistances (7) ... 

Reactor Configuration. The horizontal cross-sectional area of a reactor is a critical parameter with respect to oxygen mass-transfer effects in LPO since it influences the degree of interaction of the two types of zones. Reactions with high intrinsic rates, such as aldehyde oxidations, are largely mass-transfer rate-limited under common operating conditions. Such reactions can be conducted effectively in reactors with small horizontal cross sections. Slower reactions, however, may require larger horizontal cross sections for stable operation. 

One goal of catalyst designers is to constmct bench-scale reactors that allow determination of performance data truly indicative of performance in a full-scale commercial reactor. This has been accompHshed in a number of areas, but in general, larger pilot-scale reactors are preferred because they can be more fully instmmented and can provide better engineering data for ultimate scale-up. In reactor selection thought must be given to parameters such as space velocity, linear velocity, and the number of catalyst bodies per reactor diameter in order to properly model heat- and mass-transfer effects. 

When two-phase mass transfer is required to supply reactants by mixing for a chemical reaction, the most important factor to consider is whether the mass transfer controls the operation or whether the chemical reaction controls it. This can be done by increasing the mixer speed to a point w here mass transfer effects become very high and the operation is limited by the chemical reaction. 

When u E, this interstitial mixing effect was considered complete, and the resistance to mass transfer in the mobile phase between the particles becomes very small and the equation again reduces to the Van Deemter equation. However, under these circumstances, the C term in the Van Deemter equation now only describes the resistance to mass transfer in the mobile phase contained in the pores of the particles and, thus, would constitute an additional resistance to mass transfer in the stationary (static mobile) phase. It will be shown later that there is experimental evidence to support this. It is possible, and likely, that this was the rationale that explains why Van Deemter et al. did not include a resistance to mass transfer term for the mobile phase in their original form of the equation. 

Very recently, Luckner et al. (116) obtained initial rate data for the metathesis of propene using the W0r-Si02 catalyst at flow rates where mass transfer effects were found to be negligible. Their experimental data referring to measurements at 0.1 to 0.9 MNm-2 and 672 to 727 K could be correlated by Eq. (53). 

Yoshida and Akita (Yl) determined volumetric mass-transfer coefficients for the absorption of oxygen by aqueous sodium sulfite solutions in counter-current-ffow bubble-columns. Columns of various diameters (from 7.7 to 60.0 cm) and liquid heights (from 90 to 350 cm) were used in order to examine the effects of equipment size. The volumetric absorption coefficient reportedly increases with increasing gas velocity over the entire range investigated (up to approximately 30 cm/sec nominal velocity), and with increasing column diameter, but is independent of liquid height. These observations are somewhat at variance with those of other workers. 

Later publications have been concerned with mass transfer in systems containing no suspended solids. Calderbank measured and correlated gas-liquid interfacial areas (Cl), and evaluated the gas and liquid mass-transfer coefficients for gas-liquid contacting equipment with and without mechanical agitation (C2). It was found that gas film resistance was negligible compared to liquid film resistance, and that the latter was largely independent of bubble size and bubble velocity. He concluded that the effect of mechanical agitation on absorber performance is due to an increase of interfacial gas-liquid area corresponding to a decrease of bubble size. 

Among the earlier studies of reaction kinetics in mechanically stirred slurry reactors may be noted the papers of Davis et al. (D3), Price and Schiewitz (P5), and Littman and Bliss (L6). The latter investigated the hydrogenation of toluene catalyzed by Raney-nickel with a view to establishing the mechanism of the reaction and reaction orders, the study being a typical example of the application of mechanically stirred reactors for investigations of chemical kinetics in the absence of mass-transfer effects. 

The gas phase mass transfer coefficient for the absorption of ammonia into water from a mixture of composition NHj 20%, N2 73%, Hj 7% is found experimentally to be 0.030 m/s. What would you expect the transfer coefficient to be for a mixture of composition NH3 5%, N2 60%, Hj 35% All compositions are given on a molar basis. The total pressure and temperature are die same in both cases. The transfer coefficients are based on a steady-state film model and the effective film thickness may be assumed constant. Neglect the solubility of Ny and Hi in water. 

By using the simple Reynolds Analogy, obtain the relation between the heat transfer coefficient and the mass transfer coefficient for the gas phase for the absorption of a soluble component from a mixture of gases. If the heat transfer coefficient is 100 W/m2 K, what will the mass transfer coefficient be for a gas of specific heat capacity Cp of 1.5 kJ/kg K and density 1.5 kg/m- The concentration of the gas is sufficiently low for hulk flow effects to be negligible. 

As a second process, the hydrogenation of a-methylstyrene is a standard process for elucidating mass transfer effects in catalyst pellets and in fixed-bed reactors... 

---