Many-body approximation

With this work Born took the step of using atomic concepts and parameters, mixing them with continuum ideas (implicit solvent models) to make correlations with bulk thermodynamics. Not only was this a successful calculation but it remains a common theme in much current work on the subject some 80 years later. Born s theoretical understanding still underpins the field today, whether approached by many-body approximations [6] or by computer simulations [7]. 

Another connnon approximation is to construct a specific fonn for the many-body waveftmction. If one can obtain an accurate estimate for the wavefiinction, then, via the variational principle, a more accurate estimate for the energy will emerge. The most difficult part of this exercise is to use physical intuition to define a trial wavefiinction. 

In a number of classic papers Hohenberg, Kohn and Sham established a theoretical framework for justifying the replacement of die many-body wavefiinction by one-electron orbitals [15, 20, 21]. In particular, they proposed that die charge density plays a central role in describing the electronic stnicture of matter. A key aspect of their work was the local density approximation (LDA). Within this approximation, one can express the exchange energy as... 

The SPC/E model approximates many-body effects m liquid water and corresponds to a molecular dipole moment of 2.35 Debye (D) compared to the actual dipole moment of 1.85 D for an isolated water molecule. The model reproduces the diflfiision coefficient and themiodynamics properties at ambient temperatures to within a few per cent, and the critical parameters (see below) are predicted to within 15%. The same model potential has been extended to include the interactions between ions and water by fitting the parameters to the hydration energies of small ion-water clusters. The parameters for the ion-water and water-water interactions in the SPC/E model are given in table A2.3.2. 

There are two different aspects to these approximations. One consists in the approximate treatment of the underlying many-body quantum dynamics the other, in the statistical approach to observable average quantities. An exlmistive discussion of different approaches would go beyond the scope of this introduction. Some of the most important aspects are discussed in separate chapters (see chapter A3.7. chapter A3.11. chapter A3.12. chapter A3.131. 

The dynamics of ion surface scattering at energies exceeding several hundred electronvolts can be described by a series of binary collision approximations (BCAs) in which only the interaction of one energetic particle with a solid atom is considered at a time [25]. This model is reasonable because the interaction time for the collision is short compared witii the period of phonon frequencies in solids, and the interaction distance is shorter tlian the interatomic distances in solids. The BCA simplifies the many-body interactions between a projectile and solid atoms to a series of two-body collisions of the projectile and individual solid atoms. This can be described with results from the well known two-body central force problem [26]. 

The summation of pair-wise potentials is a good approximation for molecular dynamics calculations for simple classical many-body problems [27], It has been widely used to simulate hyperthennal energy (>1 eV) atom-surface scattering ... 

The pseudopotential is derived from an all-electron SIC-LDA atomic potential. The relaxation correction takes into account the relaxation of the electronic system upon the excitation of an electron [44]- The authors speculate that ... the ability of the SIRC potential to produce considerably better band structures than DFT-LDA may reflect an extra nonlocality in the SIRC pseudopotential, related to the nonlocality or orbital dependence in the SIC all-electron potential. In addition, it may mimic some of the energy and the non-local space dependence of the self-energy operator occurring in the GW approximation of the electronic many body problem [45]. 

Highest occupied molecular orbital Intermediate neglect of differential overlap Linear combination of atomic orbitals Local density approximation Local spin density functional theory Lowest unoccupied molecular orbital Many-body perturbation theory Modified INDO version 3 Modified neglect of diatomic overlap Molecular orbital Moller-Plesset... 

The idea in perturbation methods is that the problem at hand only differs slightly from a problem which has already been solved (exactly or approximately). The solution to the given problem should therefore in some sense be close to the solution of the already known system. This is described mathematically by defining a Hamilton operator which consists of two part, a reference (Hq) and a perturbation (H )- The premise of perturbation methods is that the H operator in some sense is small compared to Hq. In quantum mechanics, perturbational methods can be used for adding corrections to solutions which employ an independent particle approximation, and the theoretical framework is then called Many-Body Perturbation Theory (MBPT). 

Tlie suffices i and J refer to individual atoms and S and Sj to the species of the atoms involved. The summation over j extends over those neighbors of the atom i for which ry, the separation of atoms i and J, is within the cutoff radii of these potentials. The second term in Equation (la) is the attractive many-body term and both V and are empirically fitted pair potentials. A Justification for the square root form of the many-body function is provided in the framework of a second moment approximation of the density of states to the tight-binding theory incorporating local charge conservation in this framework the potentials represent squares of the hopping integrals (Ackland, et al. 1988). 

Brueckner, K. A., and Levinson, C. A., Phys. Rev. 97, 1344, Approximate reduction of the many-body problem for strongly interacting particles to a problem of SCF fields/ ... 

Rodberg, L. S., Ann. Phys. 2, 199, The many-body problem and the Brueckner approximation."... 

Use of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is implicit for any many-body problem involving electrons and nuclei as it allows us to separate electronic and nuclear coordinates in many-body wave function. Because of the large difference between electronic and ionic masses, the nuclei can be treated as an adiabatic background for instantaneous motion of electrons. So with this adiabatic approximation the many-body problem is reduced to the solution of the dynamics of the electrons in some frozen-in configuration of the nuclei. However, the total energy calculations are still impossible without making further simplifications and approximations. 

Let us now improve our two-body model by allowing the molecule of water to vibrate. A rather straightforward way to achieve the goal is simply to consider the potential energy between the two molecules as a sum of two contributions, one arising from the intermolecular and the second from the intramolecular motions an approximate interaction potential has been reported by Lie and dementi rather recently, where the intramolecular potential was simply taken over from the many body perturbation computation by Bartlett, Shavitt, and Purvis. The potential will henceforth be referred to as MCYL. 

To render the KP theory feasible for many-body systems with N particles, we make the approximation of independent instantaneous normal mode (INM) coordinates [qx° 3N for a given configuration xo 3W [12, 13], Hence the multidimensional V effectively reduces to 3N one-dimensional potentials along each normal mode coordinate. Note that INM are naturally decoupled through the 2nd order Taylor expansion. The INM approximation has also been used elsewhere. This approximation is particularly suited for the KP theory because of the exponential decaying property of the Gaussian convolution integrals in Eq. (4-26). The total effective centroid potential for N nuclei can be simplified as ... 

For an approximate determination of the sample composition it is often sufficient to measure the peak height of the core level. In general, however, core level structures are asymmetric peaks above a finite background and sometimes accompanied by satellite structures. These structures originate from the many-body character of the emission process. Therefore a peak integration including satellites and asymmetric tails is much more reliable. Due to the above difficulties quantitative analysis of XPS data should be taken as accurate to only within about 5-10%. 

We proceed now to describe some of the most common approximations to the defect environment and the many-body Schrodinger equation and some simple models relating to defects in semiconductors that have been deduced from them. 

---