Managing coexistence

The involvement of farmers and their attitudes towards transgene confinement protocols and the risk associated with the production of GM crops has not commonly been considered by regulators, yet cooperation between neighbouring farmers may be a fundamental requirement for transgene confinement (Mauro and McLachlan 2003 Riddle, 2004 Tolstrup et al., 2003). The human or cultural element of coexistence management is difficult to characterize and control (Mauro and McLachlan, 2003) and this makes coexistence success difficult to predict. Open communication between neighbours, either formal or informal, is an essential element of a successful coexistence plan (Riddle, 2004). 

Physical isolation is a traditional means of limiting PMGF in crop breeding programmes and it can be exploited as an aid to help limit transgene escape 

Tolerance of GM seeds in non-GM varieties ranges from 0 to 5% in different countries (ISF, 2004). It is widely agreed that it is impossible to maintain or guarantee that seed from a crop such as maize, soybeans, canola or cotton is absolutely free of GM seeds. It should be reiterated that IFOAM opposes mandatory testing for GM contamination and proposes that organic farmers do not have to prove that their crops are GM-free (IFOAM, 2002). The International Seed Federation (ISF) proposed that its 70 member countries 

---

As an example, consider a uniform parent distribution p(°) (a) = const, which can be written as p (o) = p /2, using the fact that pj, = do p (a). Then pf 1 — pff / 3 and p =p /5 and so a tricritical point occurs if the overall density (i.e., the copolymer volume fraction) is pf = 3/(2r + 3). Figure 13 shows the coexistence curve calculated for this parent (with r = 1), which clearly shows the tricritical point at the predicted value X1 = l/(2/4° ) = r + 3/2 = 2.5. Our numerical implementation manages to locate the tricritical point and follow the three coexisting phases without problems we take that as a signature of its robustness [58]. Note that the tricritical point that we found is closely analogous to that studied by Leibler [57] for a symmetric blend of two homopolymers and a symmetric random copolymer that is, nonetheless, chemically monodisperse (in the sense that o = 0 for all copolymers present). In fact, in our notation, the scenario of Ref. 57 simply corresponds to a parent density of the form p (o) S(o — 1) + S(o +1), with the copolymer (o = 0) now playing the role of the neutral solvent. 

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are collectively the most common coexisting condition that therapists will see in their patients who present with relationship problems, depression, or anxiety disorders. SUDs are common and often unrecognized, at least in the initial evaluation of the patient and family. This chapter does not propose to be a comprehensive treatise on the management of SUDs. It focuses on some features germane to the collaboration of physicians and nonphysician therapists in treating SUDs. We discuss alcoholism first, as the most common and the prototype of the SUDs, and then touch on selected features of several other types of SUDs. 

Graor RA, Hertzer NR (1988). Management of coexistent carotid artery and coronary artery disease. Stroke 19 1441-1443... 

---