Magnetization Lorentz model

In the MEG, we do not destroy the potentializing source dipole, which is the magnetic dipole of the permanent magnet. We include the vacuum interaction with the system, and we also include the broken symmetry of the source dipole in that vacuum exchange—a broken symmetry proved and used in particle physics for nearly a half century, but still inexplicably neglected in the conventional Lorentz-regauged subset of the Maxwell-Heaviside model. We also use the extended work-energy theorem, as discussed. 

In 1954 Lust and Schluter [14] introduced force-free magnetic fields (FFMFs) into a theoretical model for stellar media in order to allow intense magnetic fields to coexist with large currents in stellar matter with vanishing Lorentz force. Notice should be taken that the Lorentz force is the electrodynamic analogue of the Magnus force alluded to above (see Fig. 6 and compare with Fig. 2). 

Abstract. Muonium is a hydrogen-like system which in many respects may be viewed as an ideal atom. Due to the close confinement of the bound state of the two pointlike leptons it can serve as a test object for Quantum Electrodynamics. The nature of the muon as a heavy copy of the electron can be verified. Furthermore, searches for additional, yet unknown interactions between leptons can be carried out. Recently completed experimental projects cover the ground state hyperfine structure, the ls-2s energy interval, a search for spontaneous conversion of muonium into antimuonium and a test of CPT and Lorentz invariance. Precision experiments allow the extraction of accurate values for the electromagnetic fine structure constant, the muon magnetic moment and the muon mass. Most stringent limits on speculative models beyond the standard theory have been set. 

Abstract. Following a suggestion of Kostelecky et al. we have evaluated a test of CPT and Lorentz invariance from the microwave spectrosopy of muonium. Precise measurements have been reported for the transition frequencies U12 and 1/34 for ground state muonium in a magnetic field H of 1.7 T, both of which involve principally muon spin flip. These frequencies depend on both the hyperfine interaction and Zeeman effect. Hamiltonian terms beyond the standard model which violate CPT and Lorentz invariance would contribute shifts <5 12 and <5 34. The nonstandard theory indicates that P12 and 34 should oscillate with the earth s sidereal frequency and that 5v 2 and <5 34 would be anticorrelated. We find no time dependence in m2 — vza at the level of 20 Hz, which is used to set an upper limit on the size of CPT and Lorentz violating parameters. 

The Lorentz force F = q(v x B) causes the electron to process around the magnetic field direction B, and even if the total energy of the electron lies above the field-free ionization limit, the electron cannot escape except into the direction of B. This leads to relatively long lifetimes of such autoionizing states. The corresponding classical trajectories of the electron in such states are complicated and may even be chaotic. At present, investigations in several laboratories are attempting to determine how the chaotic behavior of the classical model is related to the term structure of the quantum states [567]. The question whether quantum chaos really exists is still matter of controversy [569-572]. 

Consider a classical model of a current i caused by a rotating electron in the absence of a magnetic field, see Fig. 7.1. When an external magnetic field is applied, an additional, namely, induced current appears due to the Lorentz force acting on a moving electron. The induced current component 8i tries to screen the external field... 

Figure 7.13 shows a volume element as the geometry model of the HH cell (Figure 7.10). The vectors illustrated in Figure 7.13 are the current density (J), fluid velocity (v), magnetic flux (B), Lorentz force (F), and the vector product (varB), which represents the magnitude of the electric field.

---