Sources dipole

Figure 8.18. The phase of the scattered field, evaluated at the position of the source dipole, as a function of free-space wavenumber (cm-1).

Finally, we must dissipate this collected potential energy to do work, but without using half of it to more rapidly kill the source dipole of the system itself. 

As we shall see, the source dipole furnishes the energy to power every electrical system and circuit, since all EM systems and circuits must involve charge that is merely a set of composite dipoles receiving reactive power and pouring out real power (real EM 3-energy flow). 

Once formed, the source dipole is a broken symmetry [2] in the vacuum s energy flux along the lines experimentally shown by Wu et al. in 1957 [35]. As Lee points out, the asymmetry between opposite signs of electric charge is called C violation, or charge conjugation violation, or sometimes particle-antiparticle asymmetry. As Nobelist Lee [2] further states, Since non-obser-vables imply symmetry, these discoveries of asymmetry must imply observables. ... 

Further, by the definition of broken symmetry, the proven asymmetry of the source dipole in the vacuum flux must receive virtual energy and output observable energy. Since we see only the 3-spatial output, to us it appears that the source dipole somehow extracts from the vacuum some unobservable energy, transduces it, and then pours it out as the observable EM energy that we do observe. 

Since the term source charge and source dipole are widely used, we will continue to use them, but with the clear understanding that in each case we are really speaking of 4-space energy transduction of received virtual energy into output observable energy. 

In conventional systems, a closed current22 loop contains the generator or battery source dipole as well as the external circuit s loads and losses. This... 

Classical thermodynamics, with its infamous second law, rigorously applies during the excitation discharge phase of the closed current loop system, since the system itself is diabolically designed to continuously and forcibly restore itself into equilibrium with its active environment by killing its own source dipole gusher of vacuum energy flow as fast as it powers its loads and losses. 

We must pay for the initial energy input to the generator to establish the source dipole. Once formed, the dipole continuously extracts and pours out enormous observable EM energy flow from the vacuum—if we do not foolishly... 

Those are, in fact, the requirements for electrical power systems exhibiting COP > 1.0. Such open systems in disequilibrium with their active vacuum are permitted indeed, every dipolar circuit already is in such disequilibrium. Such a system can also be close-looped to power itself and its load. For instance, an open dissipative system with COP = 2.0, can use 1.0 of its COP to power itself, and the other 1.0 to power the loads and losses [98]. This is no different from the operation of a windmill, except that the electrical system operates in an EM energy wind initiated from the vacuum by the source dipole. We point out that powering a system actually need only be powering its internal losses if the source dipole is maintained. 

Present electrical power systems simply repeat this travesty over and over, so that we are continually inputting external energy to the generator to restore the source dipole, and having to input more than we get back out as work in the load. That is why all conventional EM power systems exhibit COP <1.0 a priori. The system is specifically designed to force itself to do precisely that, by killing itself faster than it powers its load. 

Such an inane power system continually forms a marvelous extractor of vacuum energy, then attacks itself suicidally. In an oil derrick analogy, the system continually destroys its own energy flow wellhead (source dipole) and... 

There is, of course, a scalar potential established between the two end charges of a source dipole. Let us examine what kind of energy flows actually comprise a scalar potential, and whether it is a scalar entity or actually a set of multiwave multivector EM energy flows. 

In the MEG, we do not destroy the potentializing source dipole, which is the magnetic dipole of the permanent magnet. We include the vacuum interaction with the system, and we also include the broken symmetry of the source dipole in that vacuum exchange—a broken symmetry proved and used in particle physics for nearly a half century, but still inexplicably neglected in the conventional Lorentz-regauged subset of the Maxwell-Heaviside model. We also use the extended work-energy theorem, as discussed. 

---