Lorentz transformation special relativity

It is now found that (22) is indeed invariant under (24), which is known as the Lorentz5 transformation of Special Relativity. It is important to note that in the limit v/c —> 0 the Lorentz formulae reduce to the Galilean transformation, suggesting that Lorentzian (relativistic) effects only become significant at relative velocities that approach c. The condition t = t which... 

In order to give a physical interpretation of special relativity it is necessary to understand the implications of the Lorentz rotation. Within Galilean relativity the three-dimensional line element of euclidean space (r2 = r r) is an invariant and the transformation corresponds to a rotation in three-dimensional space. The fact that this line element is not Lorentz invariant shows that world space has more dimensions than three. When rotated in four-dimensional space the physical invariance of the line element is either masked by the appearance of a fourth coordinate in its definition, or else destroyed if the four-space is not euclidean. An illustration of the second possibility is the geographical surface of the earth, which appears to be euclidean at short range, although on a larger scale it is known to curve out of the euclidean plane. 

In Einstein s special theory of relativity [1,2], the Galilean transformation had to be replaced by the Lorentz transformation, so that the speed of light would be invariant or independent of the relative motion of the observers—in particular, because the assumption f t is no longer correct. In the Lorentz transformation the time is t / t. 

Figure 1. The frames of reference S and S in relative translational motion. In the frame of reference S, Lorentz transformation and special relativity principles are valid. In the frame of reference S, superluminal transformation and SLRT principles are valid.

Relative motion according to Lorentz transformation refers specifically to unaccelerated uniform motion and is therefore known as special relativity (SR). The theory which developed to also take acceleration into account is known as general relativity (TGR). Based on the demonstration, by Eotvos and others, that there is no difference between the inertial and the gravitational mass of an object, TGR also became the theory of the gravitational field. The world line of an accelerated object appears curved in a Minkowski... 

In other words, it is the distance, ct, travelled by light in a given time interval which fulfills the role of the fourth coordinate, rather than the time interval itself. The special theory of relativity requires that after a Lorentz transformation the new form of all laws of physics is the same as the old form. The Dirac equation, for example, is invariant under a Lorentz transformation. 

Not only the laws of Nature but also all major scientific theories are statements of observed symmetries. The theories of special and general relativity, commonly presented as deep philosophical constructs can, for instance, be formulated as representations of assumed symmetries of space-time. Special relativity is the recognition that three-dimensional invariances are inadequate to describe the electromagnetic field, that only becomes consistent with the laws of mechanics in terms of four-dimensional space-time. The minimum requirement is euclidean space-time as represented by the symmetry group known as Lorentz transformation. 

Figure 3.26 is of special interest in the theory of special relativity (Jennings, 1994) where iy is interpreted as the time axis in four-dimensional Minkowski space. The isotropic lines now define a time cone and the Lorentz transformation is equivalent to a complex rotation. 

This equation has at least one advantage over the Schrodinger equation ct and x, y, z enter the equation on equal footing, whieh is required by special relativity. Moreover, the Fock-Klein-Gordon equation is invariant with respect to the Lorentz transformation, whereas the Schrodinger equation is not. This is a prerequisite of any relativity-consistent theory, and it is remarkable that such a simple derivation made the theory invariant. The invariance, however, does not mean that the equation is accurate. The Fock-Klein-Gordon equation describes a boson particle because vk is a usual scalar-type function, in contrast to what we will see shortly in the Dirac equation. 

TABLE A. 6.1 The Relative Knowledge of the Distance and the Duration in Special Relativity (Based on Lorentz Transformations) in Minkovski s Universe among the inertial referential systems (IRS) events (Putz, 2010)... 

Einstein s theory of special relativity relying on a modified principle cf relativity is presented and the Lorentz transformations are identified as the natural coordinate transformations of physics. This necessarily leads to a modification cf our perception of space and time and to the concept of a four-dimensional unified space-time. Its basic Mnematic and dynamical implications on classical mechanics are discussed. Maxwell s gauge theory of electrodynamics is presented in its natural covariant 4-vector form. 

It is the fundamental Eq. (4.16), which has to obey the principle of Einstein s theory of special relativity, namely of being invariant in form in different inertial frames of reference. Hence, the choices for the Hamiltonian operator H are further limited by the requirement of form invariance of the whole equation under Lorentz transformations which will be discussed in detail in chapter 5. 

According to the special theory of relativity, all physical laws are postulated to be invariant in any inertial frame of reference. Furthermore, the equations of motion must be invariant under a Lorentz transformation. 

In the light of the chapter on special relativity (chapter 2), it is apparent that there is a possible problem in performing this separation of the space and time variables, because the Lorentz transformation mixes them. The separation would have to be performed in a particular frame of reference, and only be valid in this frame of reference. If we want results in another frame of reference, we must perform a Lorentz transformation to that frame, and there is no guarantee that we will still have a stationary state. However, if our Hamiltonian is Lorentz invariant, the choice of the frame of reference is arbitrary, and, as we saw above, the probability density is independent of time and of the frame of reference. We may therefore choose the frame that is most convenient. In molecules (and in atoms) the Born-Oppenheimer frame is the most convenient frame of reference for electronic stmcture calculations because the nuclear potential is then simply the static Coulomb potential. Regardless of whether the Hamiltonian is Lorentz invariant or not, it is this frame that we work in from here on. 

In the 4D equation, space and time coordinates are inextricably entangled. Its mathematical solutions are hypercomplex functions, or quaternions, without a commutative algebra. Quaternions are used to describe what is known as spherical rotation, also called the spin function, and the complex rotation known as the Lorentz transformation of special relativity. 

The theory of special relativity is conveniently summarized by a set of equations, known as a Lorentz transformation, which describes all relative motion, including that of electromagnetic signals, observed to propagate with constant speed c, irrespective of the observer s state of motion. This transformation. 

Maxwell s theory of electromagnetism was actually the first theory that fulfilled the requirements of special relativity (i.e. the equations are invariant under a Lorentz transformation), even before special relativity was formulated by Einstein. 

The special theory of relativity builds on the idea that the laws of physics should be the same in all frames of reference that move relative to each other on straight trajectories with constant velocity, i.e., in unaccelerated motion. The second building block of the theory is the postulate that the velocity of light in the vacuum c is a fundamental constant and thus the same in all such inertial frames. The quantities defined in one inertial system are readily calculated in a different frame of reference by making use of a special prescription that states how time and space coordinates should change such that this postulate is satisfied the Lorentz transformation. 

---