Galilean relativity

This invariance defines the principle of (Galilean) relativity, once thought to be universally valid. However, the situation for electromagnetic waves is different and the form of equation (22) is destroyed3 under a transformation... 

In order to give a physical interpretation of special relativity it is necessary to understand the implications of the Lorentz rotation. Within Galilean relativity the three-dimensional line element of euclidean space (r2 = r r) is an invariant and the transformation corresponds to a rotation in three-dimensional space. The fact that this line element is not Lorentz invariant shows that world space has more dimensions than three. When rotated in four-dimensional space the physical invariance of the line element is either masked by the appearance of a fourth coordinate in its definition, or else destroyed if the four-space is not euclidean. An illustration of the second possibility is the geographical surface of the earth, which appears to be euclidean at short range, although on a larger scale it is known to curve out of the euclidean plane. 

An electromagnetic inertial system could be found by measurement, which could be used in astronomical calculations as well. Furthermore, space must be provided for formulating an equation of motion that is less rigorous than that used in Galilean relativity theory. 

Of course, in Eq. (6) the contraction form factor p is valid only in the arm that is parallel to the velocity vector. Equation (6) was interpreted by Lorentz and Fitz-Gerald as a real contraction [17]. It is important to see that in Eq. (6) the hidden parameter p is only one possible solution for the contradiction, but the result of the M-M experiment allows numerous other solutions based on the inner properties and features of the light. The M-M experiment destroyed the world picture of classical physics, and it required a new physical system of paradigms. Thus, for example, the applicability of Galilean relativity principle was rendered invalid. 

The fictitious forces are conventionally derived with the help of the framework of classical mechanics of a point particle. Newtonian mechanics recognizes a special class of coordinate systems called inertial frames. The Newton s laws of motion are defined in such a frame. A Newtonian frame (sometimes also referred to as a fixed, absolute or absolute frame) is undergoing no accelerations and conventionally constitute a coordinate system at rest with respect to the fixed stars or any coordinate system moving with constant velocity and without rotation relative to the inertial frame. The latter concept is known as the principle of Galilean relativity. Speaking about a rotating frame of reference we refer to a coordinate system that is rotating relative to an inertial frame. 

Because of zero inertial acceleration (3.48), we can see from these general results (3.78)-(3.83), that the balances (3.70), (3.74)-(3.77) are valid in any inertial frame and not only in the one fixed with the distant stars. This assertion expresses the Galilean relativity principle about the impossibiUty of preference of any inertial frame. 

The problem relates directly to the constancy of c, which implies that the velocity of light is independent of both the motion of its source and the direction of propagation, a condition that cannot hold in more than one Newtonian inertial frame if the Galilean principle of relativity applies. Since there is no evidence that the laws of physics are not identical in all inertial frames of reference the only conclusion is that the prescription for Galilean transformations needs modification to be consistent, not only with simple mechanics, but also with electromagnetic effects. 

It is now found that (22) is indeed invariant under (24), which is known as the Lorentz5 transformation of Special Relativity. It is important to note that in the limit v/c —> 0 the Lorentz formulae reduce to the Galilean transformation, suggesting that Lorentzian (relativistic) effects only become significant at relative velocities that approach c. The condition t = t which... 

The most important new feature of the Lorentz transformation, absent from the Galilean scheme, is this interdependence of space and time dimensions. At velocities approaching c it is no longer possible to consider the cartesian coordinates of three-dimensional space as being independent of time and the three-dimensional line element da = Jx2 + y2 + z2 is no longer invariant within the new relativity. Suppose a point source located at the origin emits a light wave at time t = 0. The equation of the wave front is that of a sphere, radius r, such that... 

Actual nuclear forces are of a finite range. These are, for example, Gogny forces [40] representing more realistic approximation of actual nuclear forces than Skyrme approximation. Gogny interaction has no any velocity dependence and fulfills the Galilean invariance. Instead, two-body Skyrme interaction depends on relative velocities k = j2i (Vi — V2), which just simulates the finite range effects [20]. 

In Einstein s special theory of relativity [1,2], the Galilean transformation had to be replaced by the Lorentz transformation, so that the speed of light would be invariant or independent of the relative motion of the observers—in particular, because the assumption f t is no longer correct. In the Lorentz transformation the time is t / t. 

This (Galilean) description of relative motion had been accepted as universally valid, with proportionality constant a = 1, until it was discovered by Maxwell that the electromagnetic field was carried through the vacuum at a constant velocity, c, which is also the velocity of light. Whereas c is not affected by the motion of a light source, the simple formulae that describe relative mechanical motion are no longer adequate when applied to photons. In this case the proportionality constant a 1. 

The Galilean satellites of Jupiter, discovered in 1610 by Galileo, are the most easily observed outer planet satellites because of their size and relative proximity to the Earth. Eigure 1 shows the hemispheric-scale telescopic spectra of the satellites (Clark and McCord, 1980a). Immediately... 

In this section an alternative derivation of the governing equations for granular flow is examined. In this alternative method the peculiar velocity C, instead of the microscopic particle velocity c, is used as the independent variable in the particle property and distribution functions. The transformation of these functions and the governing equation follows standard mathematical procedures for changing the reference frame. The translational motion of an individual particle may be specified either by its microscopic velocity c relative to a fixed or Galilean frame of reference, or by its velocity relative to a frame of reference moving with the local velocity of the granular material Yd-... 

Galilean invariance (Rothman Zalesky, 1997) is a fundamental tenet of Newtonian mechanics. It is invariance under the transformation x = x - wt, where w is the constant velocity of a moving frame of reference, and embodies the concept that only the relative velocities and positions of two bodies determine their interaction. Galilean invariance is lost in lattice gas simulations because every particle has only one possible speed. This loss is an artifact that can be eliminated for incompressible fluids by re-scaling the velocity. According to Boghosian (1993), more sophisticated lattice gas models overcome this problem. Appropriate application of lattice gas models also requires certain restrictions on the mean free path of a particle (Rothman, 1988). 

The Lorentz transformation is the reformulation of the Galilean laws of relative motion to be consistent with both mechanics and electromagnetic wave motion. 

The familiar Galilean law of relative motion dictates that a stationary observer measures the position of an object in relative motion, at constant speed V, to change by an amount vt during time t. In the moving frame of reference, where the position P remains constant, the relative motion is described correctly by ... 

In the limit of small relative velocities these equations reduce to the Galilean transformation. 

The interference predicted by the Galilean transformation is impossible because physical phenomena would ejqjerience the two systems in a different way, while they differ only by their relative motions (v has to be replaced by —v). 

Lorentz transformations A set of equations for transforming the position and motion parameters from a frame of reference with orij at O and coordinates (x,y,z) to a frame moving relative to it with origin at O and coordinates (x. /.zO. They replace the Galilean transformations us in Newton-... 

The special theory. For Galileo and Newton, all uniformly moving frames of reference (Galilean frames) are equivalent for describing the dynamics of moving bodies. There is no experiment in dynamics that can distinguish between a stationary laboratory and a laboratory that is moving at uniform velocity. Einstein s special theory of relativity takes this notion of equivalent frames one step further he required all physical phenomena, not only those of dynamics, to be independent of the uniform motion of the laboratory. 

This remarkable result also has implications for the measurement of spatial intervals. The measurement of a spatial interval requires the time coincidence of two points along a measuring rod. The relativity of simultaneity means that one cannot contend that an observer who traverses a distance X m per second in the train, traverses the same distance x m also with respect to the embankment in each second. In trying to include the law of propagation of light into a relativity principle, Einstein questioned the way in which measurements of space and time in different Galilean frames are compared. Place and time measurements in two... 

Transformations that preserve the relativity principle are called Lorentz transformations. The form of these looks complicated at first (see diagram). However, they arise from the simple requirement that there can be no experiment in dynamics or electromagnetism that will distinguish between two different Galilean frames of reference. 

---