London forces force

For each of the substances the possible answers are ionic bonding, covalent bonding, metallic bonding, hydrogen bonding, dipole-dipole force, or London force. Forces, such as ion-dipole forces and ion-induced dipole forces, are not choices because these require the presence of two or more substances. For example, sodium chloride cannot utilize either of these two forces, but sodium chloride in water can. (Sodium chloride in water exhibits ion-dipole forces.)... 

London forces. Forces arising from the mutual perturbation of the electron clouds of neighboring atoms or molecules generally weak ( 8 kJ/mol), decreasing approximately as the inverse sixth power of the distance between the interacting units. 

Van der Waals forces involv ing induced dipoles are of ten called London forces or dispersion forces... 

Boiling Point When describing the effect of alkane structure on boiling point m Sec tion 2 17 we pointed out that van der Waals attractive forces between neutral molecules are of three types The first two involve induced dipoles and are often referred to as dis persion forces or London forces... 

Induced dipole/mduced dipole attraction (Section 2 17) Force of attraction resulting from a mutual and complemen tary polanzation of one molecule by another Also referred to as London forces or dispersion forces Inductive effect (Section 1 15) An electronic effect transmit ted by successive polanzation of the cr bonds within a mol ecule or an ion... 

London force (Section 2 17) See induced dipole induced dipole attraction... 

The term polymer is derived from the Greek words poly and meros, meaning many parts. We noted in the last section that the existence of these parts was acknowledged before the nature of the interaction which held them together was known. Today we realize that ordinary covalent bonds are the intramolecular forces which keep the polymer molecule intact. In addition, the usual type of intermolecular forces—hydrogen bonds, dipole-dipole interactions, and London forces—hold assemblies of these molecules together in the bulk state. The only thing that is remarkable about these molecules is their size, but that feature is remarkable indeed. 

For large deformations or for networks with strong interactions—say, hydrogen bonds instead of London forces—the condition for an ideal elastomer may not be satisfied. There is certainly a heat effect associated with crystallization, so (3H/9L) t. would not apply if stretching induced crystal formation. The compounds and conditions we described in the last section correspond to the kind of system for which ideality is a reasonable approximation. 

Polyethylene. The crystal structure of this polymer is essentially the same as those of linear alkanes containing 20-40 carbon atoms, and the values of Tjj and AHf j are what would be expected on the basis of an extrapolation from data on the alkanes. Since there are no chain substituents or intermolecular forces other than London forces in polyethylene, we shall compare other polymers to it as a reference substance. 

As the bulkiness of the substituents increases, the chains are prevented from coming into intimate contact in the crystal. The intermolecular forces which hold these crystals together are all London forces, and these become weaker as the crystals loosen up owing to substituent bulkiness. Accordingly, the value for the heat of fusion decreases moving down Table 4.2. 

Hydrocarbons without bulky side groups are held together by London forces, the weakest of intermolecular attractions. This means that the free volume tends to be large for these compounds, so a relatively large amount of cooUng is necessary before the free volume collapses. Thus Tg is low for these compounds. 

Until surface contact, the force between molecules is always one of attraction, although this attraction has different origins in different systems. London forces, dipole-dipole attractions, acid-base interactions, and hydrogen bonds are some of the types of attraction we have in mind. In the foregoing list, London forces are universal and also the weakest of the attractions listed. The interactions increase in strength and also in specificity in the order listed. 

Since London forces are universal and nonspecific, we shall eventually emphasize these, realizing that stronger forces may outweigh the London contribution in some systems. We anticipate the best results in nonpolar systems where London forces account for the interactions. 

Attractive and Repulsive Forces. The force that causes small particles to stick together after colliding is van der Waals attraction. There are three van der Waals forces (/) Keesom-van der Waals, due to dipole—dipole interactions that have higher probabiUty of attractive orientations than nonattractive (2) Debye-van der Waals, due to dipole-induced dipole interactions (ie, uneven charge distribution is induced in a nonpolar material) and (J) London dispersion forces, which occur between two nonpolar substances. 

Factors which adversely influence the separation of veiy fine particle systems are brownian motion and London forces. However, it is possible to counter these forces by the use of dispersants, temperature control, and so on. 

There are probably several factors which contribute to determining the endo exo ratio in any specific case. These include steric effects, dipole-dipole interactions, and London dispersion forces. MO interpretations emphasize secondary orbital interactions between the It orbitals on the dienophile substituent(s) and the developing 7t bond between C-2 and C-3 of the diene. There are quite a few exceptions to the Alder rule, and in most cases the preference for the endo isomer is relatively modest. For example, whereas cyclopentadiene reacts with methyl acrylate in decalin solution to give mainly the endo adduct (75%), the ratio is solvent-sensitive and ranges up to 90% endo in methanol. When a methyl substituent is added to the dienophile (methyl methacrylate), the exo product predominates. ... 

Hamaker [32] first proposed that surface forces could be attributed to London forces, or the dispersion contribution to van der Waals interactions. According to his model, P is proportional to the density of atoms np and s in the particle and substrate, respectively. He then defined a parameter A, subsequently becoming known as the Hamaker constant, such that... 

As previously mentioned, electrodynamic interactions, such as those arising from London forces, can also contribute to the adhesion of particles. These forces are dominated by dipole interactions and are broadly lumped into the classification known as van der Waals interactions. A more detailed description of van der Waals interactions than can be presented in this article is given in books by Israelachvili [95] and by Rimai and Quesnel [96]. 

Among all the low energy interactions, London dispersion forces are considered as the main contributors to the physical adsorption mechanism. They are ubiquitous and their range of interaction is in the order 2 molecular diameters. For this reason, this mechanism is always operative and effective only in the topmost surface layers of a material. It is this low level of adhesion energy combined with the viscoelastic properties of the silicone matrix that has been exploited in silicone release coatings and in silicone molds used to release 3-dimensional objects. However, most adhesive applications require much higher energies of adhesion and other mechanisms need to be involved. 

Van der Waals forces involving induced dipoles are often called London forces, or dispersion forces. 

The dispersion (London) force is a quantum mechanieal phenomenon. At any instant the electronic distribution in molecule 1 may result in an instantaneous dipole moment, even if 1 is a spherieal nonpolar moleeule. This instantaneous dipole induces a moment in 2, which interacts with the moment in 1. For nonpolar spheres the induced dipole-induced dipole dispersion energy function is... 

---