Logarithmic derivative method

Because of its simplicity, efficiency and adaptability to the hypercube computer architecture being developed at the California Institute of Technology,we have chosen Johnson s logarithmic derivative method to numerically integrate eq. (6.3). 

These experimental requirements are designed to overcome or, at least, minimize the problem of electrode polarization at low frequencies. It is important to stress that the electrode impedance dominates over that of the sample at sufficiently low frequencies, (jrosse and Tirado [77] have recently introduced a method (the quadrupole method), in which the correction for electrode polarization is optimized by following a suitable measurement routine. Finally, it has been shown that the so-called logarithmic derivative method can help in separating the effect of the electrodes from the true relaxation of the suspension permittivity [78]. Figure 3.13 allows the comparison between the accuracies achieved with the different procedures. 

A number of interesting results have been obtained (due to our fractal model of structure and the iterative averaging method) for the Hall properties of the composite for example, use of a logarithmic derivative allows one to obtain critical exponents for the effective Hall coefficient (Fig. 39) for various values of the magnetic field H. When cti = a2 (Fig. 40) the effective conductivity is a constant if H = 0 and tends to zero if H —> oo near the percolation threshold. On the left of the percolation threshold (p < pc) the rise in the Hall coefficient is more rapid as the magnetic field increases (Fig. 40). On the right of the percolation threshold (p > pc) the Hall coefficient is practically independent of the concentration p. 

The partial-wave methods do, however, have two distinct advantages. Firstly, they provide solutions of arbitrary accuracy for a muffin-tin potential and, for close-packed systems, this makes them far more accurate than any traditional fixed-basis method. Secondly, the information about the potential enters (1.21) only via a few functions of energy, the logarithmic derivatives aln i/ (E,r) /aln r, at the muffin-tin sphere. 

These methods therefore lead to secular equations (1.21) which are linear in energy, that is to eigenvalue equations of the form (1.19). When applied to a muffin-tin potential they use logarithmic-derivative parameters and provide solutions of arbitrary accuracy in a certain energy range. The linear methods thus combine the desirable features of the fixed-basis and partial-wave methods. 

In 1973 Andersen and Woolley [1.25] extended the LCMTO method to molecular calculations. At the end of their paper they introduced that choice of MTO tail, i.e. proportional to J = 9i/j/9E, which in a natural fashion ensured orthogonality to the core states and at the same time led to an accurate and elegant formulation of linear methods. The resulting, technique was immediately developed in a paper by Andersen [1.26] which, in a condensed form, contains most of what one need know about the simple concepts of linear band theory. Thus, we find here the KKR equation within the atomic-sphere approximation at this stage is called ASM the LCMTO secular matrix, latter called the LMTO matrix the energy-independent structure constants and the canonical bands and the Laurent expansion of the logarithmic-derivative function and the corresponding potential parameters. 

It follows that the interesting part of the Cr band structure can be generated accuarately by the LMTO method, with the parametrisation of only one period of each -logarithmic derivative function. This situation is typical for most metals and intermetal lie compounds. 

The LMTO method as defined in this section may be regarded as an LCAO formalism in which the muffin-tin potential, rather than the atomic potential, defines the set of basis functions used to construct the trial functions of the variational procedure. Consequently, all overlap integrals can be expressed in terms of the logarithmic derivative parameters, and the muffin-tin Hamiltonian can be solved to any accuracy. 

A local formulation of the self-interaction-corrected (LSIC) energy functionals has been proposed and tested by Luders et al. (2005). This local formulation has increased the functionality of the SIC methodology as presented in Section 3.5. The LSIC method relies on the observation that a localized state may be recognized by the phase shift, tj , defined by the logarithmic derivative ... 

APW method is used, the averaging is achieved by replacing the logarithmic derivative of the nonmetal wave function at the nonmetal muffln-tin radius in the Hamiltonian matrix elements for the stoichiometric compound by the average of the logarithmic derivatives of the nonmetal and the vacancy wave functions in the case of the substoichiometric phases. However, these calculations proved to be unsatisfactory in many respects, mainly because they did not take into account the changes in the local symmetry of the metal atoms adjacent to the vacancy. 

As mentioned in the beginning of this section, an alternative method is to perform a series analysis of equation (37). Since the effective exponent 2a is proportional to z for small z and approaches the constant 2a = 4v — 2 as z for large z. If a z) is monotonic then the series for a(z) can be reverted to yield z a) and this function will diverge as a a as (a — a) If corrections to these already asymptotic corrections are negligible, the logarithmic derivative dlnZ/d0 will be dominated by a simple pole at a = inverse function W(makes sense to directly use the series for W(extrapolation procedure to improve on the truncated series for W((t) but this is a minor technical point and does not qualitatively alter their results. Now once the function W((t) has been determined, the integra-... 

The essential difference between the APW method and the KKR method is that the latter uses an integral equation, equivalent to Schrodinger s equation, as its starting point. This change of tack results in a quite different determinantal equation although based on much the same physical ideas, indeed the same potential and the same basis functions In this case the determinant is much smaller, having a size dictated by the number of basis functions ( , in the above notation) necessary for a description of the wave function inside the spheres (typically Is -I- 3p -I- 5d = 9). The price of this compactness is to be paid in the form of more complicated elements in the determinant. However, these elements break up neatly into parts which depend on the potential (or rather logarithmic derivatives, as before)... 

It is evident from previous considerations (see Section 1.4) that the corrosion potential provides no information on the corrosion rate, and it is also evident that in the case of a corroding metal in which the anodic and cathodic sites are inseparable (c.f. bimetallic corrosion) it is not possible to determine by means of an ammeter. The conventional method of determining corrosion rates by mass-loss determinations is tedious and over the years attention has been directed to the possibility of using instantaneous electrochemical methods. Thus based on the Pearson derivation Schwerdtfeger, era/. have examined the logarithmic polarisation curves for potential breaks that can be used to evaluate the corrosion rate however, the method has not found general acceptance. 

As mentioned above, there are multiple ways to derive the PDT for the chemical potential. Here we utilize the older method in the canonical ensemble which says that 3/j,0 is just minus the logarithm of the ratio of two partition functions, one for the system with the distinguished atom or molecule present, and the other for the system with no solute. Using (11.7) we obtain [9, 48,49]... 

This method [65-67] is useful for identifying the average composition of the metal species in the system. Consider Eq. (4.36a) for the extraction of MA, and assume—for the moment—that only one species, MA , exists in the aqueous phase. Taking the derivative of the logarithm of Eq. (4.36) yields... 

---