Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Local density approximation results

One approach, using a local density approximation for each part, has E - = Es -1- Evwn, where Eg is a Slater functional and Evwn is a correlation functional from Vosko, Wilk, and Nusair (1980). Both functionals in this treatment assume a homogeneous election density. The result is unsatisfactory, leading to enors of more than 50 kcal mol for simple hydrocarbons. [Pg.328]

A second calculation was done for a two-layer tubule using density functional theory in the local density approximation to establish the optimum interlayer distance between an inner (5,5) armchair tubule and an outer armchair (10,10) tubule. The result of this calculation yielded a 3.39 A interlayer separation... [Pg.32]

The resulting matrix F corresponds to the 4/3 power of the original matrix R. If more advanced, GGA-type functionals are used rather than the local density approximation, the procedure becomes slightly more complicated due to the more complex forms of the functionals. Here we just briefly sketch the general strategy which is centered around the observation that these functionals can usually be interpreted as a product of operators con-... [Pg.128]

A possible application for the formation of a-like condensates are selfconjugate 4n nuclei such as 8Be, 12C, 160,20Ne, 24Mg, and others. Of course, results obtained for infinite nuclear matter cannot immediately be applied to finite nuclei. However, they are of relevance, e.g., in the local density approximation. We know from the pairing case that the wave function for finite systems can more or less reflect properties of quantum condensates. [Pg.89]

Below is a brief review of the published calculations of yttrium ceramics based on the ECM approach. In studies by Goodman et al. [20] and Kaplan et al. [25,26], the embedded quantum clusters, representing the YBa2Cu307 x ceramics (with different x), were calculated by the discrete variation method in the local density approximation (EDA). Although in these studies many interesting results were obtained, it is necessary to keep in mind that the EDA approach has a restricted applicability to cuprate oxides, e.g. it does not describe correctly the magnetic properties [41] and gives an inadequate description of anisotropic effects [42,43]. Therefore, comparative ab initio calculations in the frame of the Hartree-Fock approximation are desirable. [Pg.144]

This approximation uses only the local density to define the approximate exchange-correlation functional, so it is called the local density approximation (LDA). The LDA gives us a way to completely define the Kohn-Sham equations, but it is crucial to remember that the results from these equations do not exactly solve the true Schrodinger equation because we are not using the true exchange-correlation functional. [Pg.15]

Fig. 4.3. Position of the image plane in the jellium model. The surface potential of an electron in the jellium model is calculated using the local-density approximation. By fitting the numerically calculated surface potential with the classical image potential, Eq. (4.7), the position of the image plane is obtained as a function of r, and z. The results show that the classical image potential is accurate down to about 3 bohrs from the boundary of the uniform positive charge background. For metals used in STM, r, 2 — 3 bohr, zo 0.9 bohr. (Reproduced from Appelbaum and Hamann, 1972, with permission. Fig. 4.3. Position of the image plane in the jellium model. The surface potential of an electron in the jellium model is calculated using the local-density approximation. By fitting the numerically calculated surface potential with the classical image potential, Eq. (4.7), the position of the image plane is obtained as a function of r, and z. The results show that the classical image potential is accurate down to about 3 bohrs from the boundary of the uniform positive charge background. For metals used in STM, r, 2 — 3 bohr, zo 0.9 bohr. (Reproduced from Appelbaum and Hamann, 1972, with permission.
After the discovery of the relativistic wave equation for the electron by Dirac in 1928, it seems that all the problems in condensed-matter physics become a matter of mathematics. However, the theoretical calculations for surfaces were not practical until the discovery of the density-functional formalism by Hohenberg and Kohn (1964). Although it is already simpler than the Hartree-Fock formalism, the form of the exchange and correlation interactions in it is still too complicated for practical problems. Kohn and Sham (1965) then proposed the local density approximation, which assumes that the exchange and correlation interaction at a point is a universal function of the total electron density at the same point, and uses a semiempirical analytical formula to represent such universal interactions. The resulting equations, the Kohn-Sham equations, are much easier to handle, especially by using modern computers. This method has been the standard approach for first-principles calculations for solid surfaces. [Pg.112]

In this paper we present preliminary results of an ab-initio study of quantum diffusion in the crystalline a-AlMnSi phase. The number of atoms in the unit cell (138) is sufficiently small to permit computation with the ab-initio Linearized Muffin Tin Orbitals (LMTO) method and provides us a good starting model. Within the Density Functional Theory (DFT) [15,16], this approach has still limitations due to the Local Density Approximation (LDA) for the exchange-correlation potential treatment of electron correlations and due to the approximation in the solution of the Schrodinger equation as explained in next section. However, we believe that this starting point is much better than simplified parametrized tight-binding like s-band models. [Pg.536]


See other pages where Local density approximation results is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.857]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.182]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.346 , Pg.347 , Pg.348 , Pg.349 , Pg.350 ]




SEARCH



Density approximate

Density results

Local approximation

Local density approximation

© 2024 chempedia.info