Loading diagram

Fig. 24. Souders load diagram for capacity limit determination for four stmctured packiags of the Sul2er-MeUapak type. The soHd lines represent the capacity limits of the respective packiags as defiaed by a pressure drop of 1.2 kPa/m (A) 125 Y (B) 250Y (C) 350Y (D) 500 Y. Flooding rates are about...

Loading Diagram Strain Range Load Factor Kl Lumped Mass Factor, Kj O j Uniform Mass Factor, Bending Resistance, Rb Spring Constant, K. Dynamic Reaction, V... 

The estimated hours (converted to months) for each discipline are then distributed over the corresponding duration and totalized to develop the labor loading diagram and the construction progress curve illustrated in the bottom chart or Fig. 9.2. 

Fig. 4. Load versus extension for centre cracked panels. Diagram in (a) shows the results for one of the 5 tests from easel to case 4. The standard deviation of the peak load is shown on the curve for each case. Picture above was taken when the load for case 3 reaches the peak load Diagram in (b) shows the detail result at extension from zero to 5 mm.

Fracture toughness, expressed in term of the critical stress intensity factor Kc, was determined at fracture initiation and that point was identified from the load diagram. Although linearity requirements as set out in the protocol were generally satisfied, the identification of the point of fracture initiation from the load diagram was often uncertain because of the difficulty to distinguish small, residual fluctuations in the load signal due to dynamic effects from a pop-in effect. When in doubt about that the test was discarded. 

The variation of the loading curve shape with fibre orientation (angle a) is less regular in Im/s fracture tests and the identification of the point of fracture initiation from the load diagram was often problematic. Load-point displacements at fracture initiation in 1 m/s tests appear to be larger than in low rate tests. This apparent result is not unexpected, in view of the damping technique used in the impact tests which increases the compliance of the test system initially. 

In the case that carrier and solvent are immiscible, the concentration of solute in extract and raffinate can be graphically depicted with the equilibrium curve in the loading diagram. Together with the volumes of feed and solvent, the mass balance for the solute leads to the amount of solute that can be recovered. 

The slope of the operating line is defined by the solvent ratio. The minimum solvent ratio depicts the operating line in the loading diagram with a common point on the equilibrium curve. Indefinite theoretical stages on the operating line would be neces-... 

The NTU values that characterise the concentration profile can be graphically determined if the operation line is parallel to the equilibrium curve in the loading diagram. In this case NTUp, = NTUg and reflects the theoretical stage number n,. A deviation of the ideal plug flow in the continuous and dispersed phase occurs for the following reasons ... 

Figure 7.5 Four-point loading. The distance between the loading noses is one-third of the support span (see the loading diagram in Fig. 7.6). (a) Minimum radius = 1/2 inch (12.7 mm), (b) maximum radius supports and loading nose =1.5 times the specimen depth. Source of the figure—ASTM D 6109-03, Copyright ASTM International. Reprinted with permission.

Figure 7.6 Four-point loading diagram. Source of the figure— ASTM D 6109-03, Copyright ASTM International. Reprinted with permission.

The load is assumed to be applied at its center of gravity, and the moment figured about line (ab). Because of the irregular shape of the load diagram, it is difficult to locate the center of gravity. It is more convenient to break it into its component parts (prisms, wedges, pyramids, etc), and figure the moment of each part separately. Obviously, the total moment,, will be the sum of the individual moments. 

Figure 19.12 Differential pressure control, (a) T5rpical scheme (b) typical pressure drop-load diagram, depicting suitable control range.

Figure 2-43. Loading diagram of single-beam support. Area of loading s 48%.

Figure 2-47. Loading diagram of a continuous ring. Case 1 Single Beam...

Figure 2-52. Load diagram for a typical vertical vessel.

Figure 3-12. Load diagrams for horizontal load distribution.

Figure 3-13. Load diagrams for vertical load distribution.

Figure 3-65. Loading diagram of base plate with one gusset.

Figure 3-67. Loading diagram of compression plate wKh one gusset.

Figure 4-9. Loading diagram for a ring girder vertical forces on a ring beam. Horizontal Forces on Ring Beam...

Figure 5-8. Dimensions and loading diagram for beam on elastic foundation anaiysis.

---