Linearity, consequences shear flow

The Eyring analysis does not explicity take chain structures into account, so its molecular picture is not obviously applicable to polymer systems. It also does not appear to predict normal stress differences in shear flow. Consequently, the mechanism of shear-rate dependence and the physical interpretation of the characteristic time t0 are unclear, as are their relationships to molecular structure and to cooperative configurational relaxation as reflected by the linear viscoelastic behavior. At the present time it is uncertain whether the agreement with experiment is simply fortuitous, or whether it signifies some kind of underlying unity in the shear rate dependence of concentrated systems of identical particles, regardless of their structure and the mechanism of interaction. 

In retrospect, the effect of the change of variables has been to deform the velocity field from axisymmetric stagnation flow over a sphere to linear shear flow along a flat plate. The main advantage of the new coordinates is that the coefficients of the derivatives in (32) are independent of X, and consequently Duhamel s theorem can be applied. Thus, the following procedure can be used (1) solve equation (32) subject to a uniform surface concentration (2) extend this solution to one valid for an arbitrary, nonuniform surface concentration by applying Duhamel s theorem (3) select the surface concentration which satisfies (33a). 

For shearing flows of more dissipative spheres at solid volume fractions less than 0.49 we adopt the constitutive relations obtained by Garzo and Dufty (1999) for identical frictionlesS inelastic spheres, but do not incorporate the small terms introduced by their function c of the coefficient of restitution. The magnitude of c is less than 0.4 and terms proportional to it are typically multiplied by a small numerical coefficient. The theory is linear in the first spatial gradients of the fields p, M, and T, as is the theory for nearly elastic spheres, and its derivation involves the tacit assumption that the deviatoric part A of the secoi moment is a small fraction of T, its trace. However, the determination (4.8) of A in the simplest theory, used with the solution (4.19) for T in steady, homogeneous shearing, indicates that A/T can become large as e becomes small. Consequently, the theory has to be used with some caution. 

The variation in wall thickness and the development of cell wall rigidity (stiffness) with time have significant consequences when considering the flow sensitivity of biomaterials in suspension. For an elastic material, stiffness can be characterised by an elastic constant, for example, by Young s modulus of elasticity (E) or shear modulus of elasticity (G). For a material that obeys Hooke s law,for example, a simple linear relationship exists between stress, , and strain, a, and the ratio of the two uniquely determines the value of the Young s modulus of the material. Furthermore, the (strain) energy associated with elastic de-... 

Most characterisation of non-linear responses of materials with De < 1 have concerned the application of a shear rate and the shear stress has been monitored. The ratio at any particular rate has defined the apparent viscosity. When these values are plotted against one another we produce flow curves. The reason for the popularity of this approach is partly historic and is related to the type of characterisation tool that was available when rheology was developing as a subject. As a consequence there are many expressions relating shear stress, viscosity and shear rate. There is also a plethora of interpretations for meaning behind the parameters in the modelling equations. There are a number that are commonly used as phenomenological descriptions of the flow behaviour. 

In Figure 5.2 we show consecutive vertical profiles from the wind tunnel model study of Finnigan and Brunet [186], Although this hill is too steep to satisfy the H/L 1 limits of linear theory, upwind of the hillcrest we can still see the main features predicted by the model of Finnigan and Belcher, [189], The maximum velocity in the lower canopy occurs well before the crest and is falling by the hilltop. The difference between lower canopy and outer layer velocities is a maximum at the hilltop and maximizes the canopy top shear at that point with consequences for the magnitude and scale of turbulence production. Conversely, the difference is at a minimum halfway up the hill, where the lower-canopy velocity is maximal but the outer layer flow has not yet increased much. This effect is so marked that the inflexion point in the velocity profile at the top of the canopy has disappeared. Note also that on this steep hill we observe a large separation bubble behind the hillcrest. 

If the particles are not spherical, even in the very dilute limit where the translational Brownian motion would still be unimportant, rotational Brownian motion would come into play. This is a consequence of the fact that the rotational motion imparts to the particles a random orientation distribution, whereas in shear-dominated flows nonspherical particles tend toward preferred orientations. Since the excess energy dissipation by an individual anisotropic particle depends on its orientation with respect to the flow field, the suspension viscosity must be affected by the relative importance of rotational Brownian forces to viscous forces, although it should still vary linearly with particle volume fraction. 

At the rotation of m-ball under the action of g the angular rotation rate for any polymeric chain is the same but their links depending on the remoteness from the rotation center will have different linear movement rates. Consequently, in m-ball there are local velocity gradients of the hydrodynamic flow. Let represents the averaged upon m-ball local velocity gradient of the hydrodynamic flow additional to g. Then, the tangential or strain shear a formed by these gradients and g at the rotation movement of w-ball in the medium of a solvent will be equal to ... 

Khalkhal and Carreau (2011) examined the linear viscoelastic properties as well as the evolution of the stmcture in multiwall carbon nanotube-epoxy suspensions at different concentration under the influence of flow history and temperature. Initially, based on the frequency sweep measurements, the critical concentration in which the storage and loss moduli shows a transition from liquid-like to solid-like behavior at low angular frequencies was found to be about 2 wt%. This transition indicates the formation of a percolated carbon nanotube network. Consequently, 2 wt% was considered as the rheological percolation threshold. The appearance of an apparent yield stress, at about 2 wt% and higher concentration in the steady shear measurements performed from the low shear of 0.01 s to high shear of 100 s confirmed the formation of a percolated network (Fig. 7.9). The authors used the Herschel-Bulkley model to estimate the apparent yield stress. As a result they showed that the apparent yield stress scales with concentration as Xy (Khalkhal and Carreau 2011). 

Here / h is the Chilton-Colburn factor for mass transport, i th mass transport coefficient, u the linear flow velocity. Sc = V/D is the Schmidt number and / is the friction coefficient. As a consequence, a higher shear stress also means a higher mass transport rate and vice versa. 

To capture the onset of extrudate distortions which can be associated with melt flow instabilities in the die, several modelling approaches have been followed [4]. Two common hypotheses are forwarded and centre around the so-called constitutive and slip instability issues. The constitutive approach starts with the premise that, on the basis of some viscoelastic theory, the shear stress becomes a many-valued function of shear rate. As a consequence of this noiunonotone function, a melt flow instability and the associated distorted extrudate will develop. For many commercial polymers, the nonmonotone function could be considered as the sum total of many nonmonotone functions, each associated with a specific molecular weight fraction. The associated experimental apparent shear stress-apparent-shear rate curve could then become monotone, i.e. as in Figure 1(b), as is the case for PP. It should be noted that for viscoelastic materials, no direct linear relation exists between a constitutive shear stress-shear rate function and the experimental pressure (apparent shear stress)-flow rate (apparent shear rate) curve. 

---