Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Limiting permeability diffusion limitation

When the permeability, diffusion, and solubility coefficients are functions of pressure their experimental values are mean values (P,D, and S) for the pressures applied at the membrane interfaces, cf., eqs. (61.6-61.8). Equations (61.12-61.14) are applic able als o to P, D, and 5 over a limited range of temperatures. The activation energies Ep and Ed commonly decrease with increasing pressure. [Pg.1036]

The dependence of permeability, diffusion, and solubility coefficients on penetrant gas pressure (or concentration in polymers) is very different at temperatures above and below the glass transition temperature, Tg, of the polymers, i.e., for mbbery and glassy polymers, respectively. Thus, when the polymers are in the rubbery state the pressure dependence of these coefficients depends, in turn, on the gas solubility in polymers. For example, as mentioned in Section 61.2.4, if the penetrant gases are very sparsely soluble and do not significantly plasticize the polymers, the permeability coefficients as well as the diffusion and solubility coefficients are independent of penetrant pressure. This is the case for supercritical gases with very low critical temperatures (compared to ambient temperature), such as the helium-group gases, Ha, Oa, Na, CH4, etc., whose concentration in rubbery polymers is within the Heruy s law limit even at elevated pressures. [Pg.1036]

Let us now turn attention to situations in which the flux equations can be replaced by simpler limiting forms. Consider first the limiting case of dilute solutions where one species, present in considerable excess, is regarded as a solvent and the remaining species as solutes. This is the simplest Limiting case, since it does not involve any examination of the relative behavior of the permeability and the bulk and Knudsen diffusion coefficients. [Pg.36]

From what has been said, it is clear that both physical and mathematical aspects of the limiting processes require more careful examination, and we will scare this by examining the relative values of the various diffusion coefficients and the permeability, paying particular attention to their depec dence on pore diamater and pressure. [Pg.37]

At the opposite limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability, all flux models are required to he consistent with the Stefan-Maxwell relations (8.3). Since only (n-1) of these are independent, they are insufficient to determine all the flux vectors, and they permit the problem to be formulated in closed form only when they can be supplemented by the stoichiometric relations (11.3). At this limit, therefore, attention must be restricted from the beginning to those simple pellet shapes for ich equations (11.3) have been justified. Furthermore, since the permeability tends to infininty, pressure gradients within the pellet tend to zero and... [Pg.115]

Hite s treatment is based on equations (5.18) and (5.19) which describe the dusty gas model at the limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability. Since temperature Is assumed constant, partial pressures are proportional to concentrations, and it is convenient to replace p by cRT, when the flux equations become... [Pg.145]

As a particular case of this result, it follows that the stoichiometric relations are always satisfied in a binary mixture at the limit of bulk diffusion control and Infinite permeability (at least to the extent that the dusty gas equations are valid), since then all the binary pair bulk diffusion coefficients are necessarily equal, as there is only one of them. This special case was discussed by Hite and Jackson [77], and the reasoning set out here is a straightforward generalization of their treatment. [Pg.149]

When bulk diffusion controls and the d Arcy permeability is large, corresponding to pores of large diameter, the flux relations for a binary mixture reduce to a limiting form given by equation (3.29) and its companion obtained by interchanging the suffixes 1 and 2, namely... [Pg.164]

The same device was used in section 11.7 when discussing steady states at the limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability. [Pg.165]

In section 11.4 Che steady state material balance equations were cast in dimensionless form, therary itancifying a set of independent dimensionless groups which determine ice steady state behavior of the pellet. The same procedure can be applied to the dynamical equations and we will illustrate it by considering the case t f the reaction A - nB at the limit of bulk diffusion control and high permeability, as described by equations (12.29)-(12.31). [Pg.168]

Furthermore, for calculating the effective coefficient of quasi-diffusion in a composite (D) with the corresponding limitation of the entire process of heterogeneous mass-exchange, equations reported in Section 5.1 may be used. The high kinetic permeability of cellosorbents for large organic ions are listed in Table 16. [Pg.42]

As described above, some solutes such as gases can enter the cell by diffusing down an electrochemical gradient across the membrane and do not require metabolic energy. The simple passive diffusion of a solute across the membrane is limited by the thermal agitation of that specific molecule, by the concentration gradient across the membrane, and by the solubility of that solute (the permeability coefficient. Figure 41—6) in the hydrophobic core of the membrane bilayer. Solubility is... [Pg.423]

Classical commercial ceramic porous materials, as those obtained via sol-gel processes, generally have adequate permeabilities but could present some drawbacks They indeed have a limited thermal stability and are generally not permselective enough their pores are in the mesoporous range and maximum separation factors correspond to Knudsen diffusion mechanisms. [Pg.127]

Under conditions of nonlimiting interfacial kinetics the normalized steady-state current is governed primarily by the value of K y, which is the relative permeability of the solute in phase 2 compared to phase 1, rather than the actual value of or y. In contrast, the current time characteristics are found to be highly dependent on the individual K. and y values. Figure 16 illustrates the chronoamperometric behavior for K = 10, log(L) = —0.8 and for a fixed value of Kf.y = 2. It can be seen clearly from this plot that whereas the current-time behavior is sensitive to the value of Kg and y, in all cases the curves tend to be the same steady-state current in the long-time limit. This difference between the steady-state and chronoamperometric characteristics could, in principle, be exploited in determining the concentration and diffusion coefficient of a solute in a phase that is not in direct contact with the UME probe. [Pg.309]

One of the key parameters for correlating molecular structure and chemical properties with bioavailability has been transcorneal flux or, alternatively, the corneal permeability coefficient. The epithelium has been modeled as a lipid barrier (possibly with a limited number of aqueous pores that, for this physical model, serve as the equivalent of the extracellular space in a more physiological description) and the stroma as an aqueous barrier (Fig. 11). The endothelium is very thin and porous compared with the epithelium [189] and often has been ignored in the analysis, although mathematically it can be included as part of the lipid barrier. Diffusion through bilayer membranes of various structures has been modeled for some time [202] and adapted to ophthalmic applications more recently [203,204]. For a series of molecules of similar size, it was shown that the permeability increases with octa-nol/water distribution (or partition) coefficient until a plateau is reached. Modeling of this type of data has led to the earlier statement that drugs need to be both... [Pg.441]


See other pages where Limiting permeability diffusion limitation is mentioned: [Pg.199]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.1684]    [Pg.4285]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.925]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.819]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.185]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.502 ]




SEARCH



Diffusion limit

Diffusion limitation

Diffusion limiting

Diffusion permeability

Diffusive limit

Limiting diffusivity

© 2024 chempedia.info