Ligand inner-sphere complexation

The species (MS03)" represents an inner-sphere complex between sulphite and the oxidant formed by ligand-displacement. (MS03)" is formed by abstracting an electron from... 

It is important to distinguish between outer-sphere and inner-sphere complexes. In inner-sphere complexes the surface hydroxyl groups act as o-donor ligands which increase the electron density of the coordinated metal ion. Cu(II) bound inner-... 

The mechanism given is in support of the existence of inner-sphere surface complexes it illustrates that one of the water molecules coordinated to the metal ion has to dissociate in order to form an inner-sphere complex if this H20-loss is slow, then the adsorption, i.e., the binding of the metal ion to the surface ligands, is slow. 

The reactivity of the surface (Fig. 5.3), i.e., its tendency to dissolve, depends on the type of surface species present e.g., an inner-sphere complex with a ligand such as that shown for oxalate... 

Rates of ligand exchange depend quite strongly on the coordina-tive environment of the metal center. The water exchange rate of Fe(H2O)5(OH)is almost three orders of magnitude higher than that of Fe(H20)g+, and follows a dissociative, rather than an associative exchange mechanism (20). Fe(1120)5(OH)has also been shown to form inner-sphere complexes with phenols (27), catechols (28), and a-hydroxycarboxylic acids (29) much more quickly than Fe(H20) +. The mechanism for complex formation with phenolate anion (A-) is shown below (27) ... 

Figure 1. An Fe(H20)62+-Fe(HgO)6s+ complex at the traditional inner-sphere contact distance with the inner-sphere complexes (Th symmetry) oriented to give overall S6 symmetry. This geometry is favorable for transfer of an electron between t g-5d atomic orbitals (AO s, which have

Complexation reactions are assumed to proceed by a mechanism that involves initial formation of a species in which the cation and the ligand (anion) are separated by one or more intervening molecules of water. The expulsion of this water leads to the formation of the inner sphere complex, in which the anion and cation are in direct contact. Some ligands cannot displace the water and complexation terminates with the formation of the outer sphere species, in which the cation and anion are separated by a molecule of water. Metal cations have been found to form stable inner and outer sphere complexes and for some ligands both forms of complexes may be present simultaneously. 

These considerations lead, for example, to the assignment of a predominantly outer sphere character to Cl, Br, F, CIO3, NO3, sulfonate, and trichloro-acetate complexes and an inner sphere character to F", IO3, SO, and acetate complexes of trivalent actinides and lanthanides. The variation in AH° and AS° of complexation of related ligands indicates that those whose pA), values are <2 form predominantly outer sphere complexes, while those for whom > 2 form predominantly inner sphere complexes with the trivalent lanthanides and actinides. As the pK increases above 2, increasing predominance of inner sphere complexation is expected for these metals. 

This account is concerned with the rate and mechanism of the important group of reactions involving metal complex formation. Since the bulk of the studies have been performed in aqueous solution, the reaction will generally refer, specifically, to the replacement of water in the coordination sphere of the metal ion, usually octahedral, by another ligand. The participation of outer sphere complexes (ion pair formation) as intermediates in the formation of inner sphere complexes has been considered for some time (122). Thermodynamic, and kinetic studies of the slowly reacting cobalt(III) and chromium(III) complexes (45, 122) indicate active participation of outer sphere complexes. However, the role of outer sphere complexes in the reactions of labile metal complexes and their general importance in complex formation (33, 34, 41, 111) had to await modern techniques for the study of very rapid reactions. Little evidence has appeared so far for direct participation of the... 

The equilibria considered up to now have all involved inner sphere complexes. There is the possibility that an inner sphere complex may react with free ligands in solution this includes the solvent itself, to give an outer sphere complex where the ligand enters the secondary solvation shell of the inner sphere complex. If the two species involved in this type of interaction are of opposite sign, which is the situation where this type of complex formation is expected to be most effective, the outer sphere complex is called an ion pair. Fuoss65 has derived an expression (equation 38) for the ion pair formation constant, XIP, from electrostatic arguments ... 

The formation of inner-sphere complexes is favoured at relatively high pH values, and increases according to the type of amine in the order tertiary < secondary < primary, i.e. in the order of decreasing steric hindrance of the ligand. 

In coordination chemistry two types of complex can occur between metals and complexant ligands. Outer-sphere complexes are relatively weak electrostatic associations between a hydrated metal ion and a complexant ligand, and in which both of the charged species retain a hydration shell. In contrast, inner-sphere complexes are stronger interactions in which a covalent bond is formed between a metal ion and a ligand. 

The protonated aluminol sites are the most effective fluoride sorption sites and are usually responsible for the rapid kinetics due to coulombic attraction between the positively charged sites and the negatively charged fluoride species. The reaction with non-protonated sites involves ligand exchange, leads also to the formation of inner-sphere complexes, releases hydroxyl ions, is slow and characterized by a higher activation energy. 

---