Lewis bases, affinity

Nucleophilicity roughly parallels basicity when comparing nucleophiles that have the same reacting atom. For example, OH- is both more basic and more nucleophilic than acetate ion, CH3CO2-, which in turn is more basic and more nucleophilic than H20. Since "nucleophilicity" is usually taken as the affinity of a Lewis base for a carbon atom in the Sfj2 reaction and "basicity" is the affinity of a base for a proton, it s easy to see why there might be a correlation between the two kinds of behavior. 

Many years ago, geochemists recognized that whereas some metallic elements are found as sulfides in the Earth s crust, others are usually encountered as oxides, chlorides, or carbonates. Copper, lead, and mercury are most often found as sulfide ores Na and K are found as their chloride salts Mg and Ca exist as carbonates and Al, Ti, and Fe are all found as oxides. Today chemists understand the causes of this differentiation among metal compounds. The underlying principle is how tightly an atom binds its valence electrons. The strength with which an atom holds its valence electrons also determines the ability of that atom to act as a Lewis base, so we can use the Lewis acid-base model to describe many affinities that exist among elements. This notion not only explains the natural distribution of minerals, but also can be used to predict patterns of chemical reactivity. 

Metals that are soft Lewis acids, for example cadmium, mercury, and lead, are extremely hazardous to living organisms. Tin, in contrast, is not. One reason is that tin oxide is highly insoluble, so tin seldom is found at measurable levels in aqueous solution. Perhaps more important, the toxic metals generally act by binding to sulfur in essential enz Tnes. Tin is a harder Lewis acid than the other heavy metals, so it has a lower affinity for sulfur, a relatively soft Lewis base. 

Thionyl chloride reacts as both a Lewis acid and a Lewis base, and both the S and Se compounds are very reactive toward many other materials. The hydrolysis reactions take place readily, and SOCl2 has such an affinity for water that is used as a dehydrating agent. 

A novel form of Y HX hydrogen bonding49 results when the Lewis base Y is itself a hydride ion (H-). Because the electron affinity of a hydrogen atom is extremely weak (21 kcal mol-1), the H- ion is among the most weakly bound and diffuse anionic species known, and hence a powerful Lewis base. In this case, the H - -HX complex can be referred to as a dihydrogen bond 50 to denote the unusual H-bonding between hydrogen atoms. A water complex of this type was... 

The relationship given in Fig. 2.7 illustrates the affinities of cations and anions to the Lewis bases and Lewis acids of oxide and silicate surfaces. For alkali and earth... 

Compounds with a high HOMO and LUMO (Figure 5.5c) tend to be stable to selfreaction but are chemically reactive as Lewis bases and nucleophiles. The higher the HOMO, the more reactive. Carbanions, with HOMO near a, are the most powerful bases and nucleophiles, followed by amides and alkoxides. The neutral nitrogen (amines, heteroaromatics) and oxygen bases (water, alcohols, ethers, and carbonyls) will only react with relatively strong Lewis acids. Extensive tabulations of gas-phase basicities or proton affinities (i.e., —AG° of protonation) exist [109, 110]. These will be discussed in subsequent chapters. 

Nucleophilicity. A distinction is usually made between nucleophilicity and Lowry-Bronsted basicity [213]. The latter involves specifically reaction at a proton which is complexed to a Lewis base (usually H2O), while the former refers to reactivity at centers other than H. Linear correlations have been shown for gas-phase basicity (proton affinity) and nucleophilicity of nitrogen bases toward CH3I in solution [214] where the solvent is not strongly involved in charge dispersal. In each case, reaction of the base/nucleophile... 

Fig. 19. Saturation of primary affinity. Two-dimensional representation of an electron-domain model of the formation of a conventional chemical bond the reaction of a Lewis base (NHg) with a relatively strong Lewis acid (BH3).

The high heat of formation of the N3 cation ( 350 kcal/mol) makes it very attractive as a component of high energy density materials (HEDMs). However, its large vertical electron affinity (vEA) of 6.1 eV poses a problem So far, the preparation of only NsAsFg, N ShF, and NjSb2Fu has been reported. The oxidation of Br2 (IP 10.5 eV) by N SbFj shows that N3 is also susceptible to nucleophilic attack by Lewis bases. Calculations on NjNj show that such a crystal may exist, but nucleophilic attach of the anion is a likely side-reaction. We think that less electronegative derivatives of N3 may be less sensitive to both reduction and nucleophilic attack. 

Since Lewis bases such as pyridine and imidazole have high affinities for the axial coordination site in Por and Pc chelates, the complexes are well retained on immobilized ligands, for example, imidazole covalently linked to SiCL (104-106). Moreover, this axial coordination often improves the catalytic activity and selectivity, as in the Mn porphyrin-catalyzed epoxi-dation with H2O2 (7,107). However, immobilization by coordinative binding can be quite sensitive to solvent effects and competitive binding of ligands. 

Loosely bound aggregates (chemical effects) are formed with the hydrocarbons acting as electron donors (Lewis base) and the solvents acting as electron acceptors (Lewis acid). The hydrocarbon that forms the most stable complex with the solvent experiences a decrease in volatility. Electron donors are rated by ionization potential, and electron acceptors are rated by their electron affinities. The selectivity will be higher, the larger the difference in ionization potential between the hydrocarbons and the larger the electron affinity of the solvent (9). While data on ionization potentials of hydrocarbons can be found (15, 16), electron affinities data are rare because of difficulties in their experimental determination. Prausnitz and Anderson (8) recommend that the sigma scale, proposed by Hammett (17), be used to determine approximately the solvents relative ability to form complexes with the two hydrocarbons. Attempts by this author, however, to use this scale were not conclusive. Prausnitz and Anderson (8) should be consulted to understand better the physical and chemical effects. 

These studies were extended briefly to a number of other Lewis bases, including dimethyl ether to look for trends relating to base strength or proton affinity (74). The major spectral features of the complexes were shifted vibrational modes of the base, but these shifts were much less substantial than for H2O or NH3, and very little information about the nature or structure of the complex could be extracted. 

It is a generally accepted tenet that the Lewis basicity of trivalent group 15 compounds decreases with the heavier congeners. As the triorgano substituted complexes are generally easier to investigate than the hydrides, numerous studies have been concerned with the Lewis base interaction of R3E compounds (E = P, As, Sb, Bi) with boron Lewis acids and with the proton affinity (PA) of R3E and EH3 species The proton affinities of a series of PhjE compounds (E = P, As, Sb) have been determined... 

---