Level density parameter

In practical usage the constants a and C are empirically-determined. Only experiments at low E, like resonance counting, are sensitive to the prefactor C. Experiments in the region of unresolved states are sensitive only to a relative change in the level density, i.e., (o E + A)/ co E ), and thus only the level density parameter a can be extracted. It is the parameter a that... 

Level-density parameter a as a function of mass number. The solid line shows an average fit for a = (An.9) MeV (from Huizenga and Moretto 1972)... 

Left The mononuclear excess entropy (above that for a nonexpanded system) as a function of a self-similar expansion coordinate (inverse of scaled radius parameter, i.e., C = 1 no expansion), for unit (MeV) steps in the excitation energy per nucleon e. Right The level density parameter with expansion but m /m = 1 dotted), considering both expansion and the evolution of nik (dashed) and expansion with both mi, and (solid) are shown (Sobotka et al. 2004)... 

The effective mass, introduced in Sect. 3.3 and discussed more in Sect. 3.5, is the factor that corrects a single-particle logic for the many-body correlations. Thus, one can say that the study of the evolution in the level-density parameter a, is one of determination of how m changes with E. This thermal sector was discussed in Sect. 3.5. 

The plateau in the caloric curve is only indicative of access to additional degrees of fi eedom, not necessarily access to prompt multifi agment decay. For example, expansion or greatly increasing the surface dififuseness, or an increase in the level-density parameter all would decrease the rate of increase of T with , as discussed in O Sect. 3.5. However, numerous... 

Figure 2 shows another example of the need for discrete-level descriptions of nuclei. Two computations of the 89Y(n,y) excitation function[GAR84b] were made. In the first, the 89Y and nuclei were described above the ground state with an additional 24 levels provided by E. A. Henry[HEN77] in the second, the additonal levels were replaced with the Gilbert-Cameron level-density formulae and the Cook-modified parameters. Since the first level above the ground state in 89Y lies at 0.9 MeV, no inelastic... 

It must be emphasized that such phenomena are to be expected for a statistical system only in the regime of low level densities. Theories like RRKM and phase space theory (PST) (Pechukas and Light 1965) are applicable when such quantum fluctuations are absent for example, due to a large density of states and/or averaging over experimental parameter such as parent rotational levels in the case of incomplete expansion-cooling and/or the laser linewidth in ultrafast experiments. However, in the present case, it is unlikely that such phenomena can be invoked to explain why different rates are obtained when using ultrafast pump-probe methods that differ only in experimental detail. 

In black and white microscopic imaging, two types of parameters can be extracted from boundary coordinates for quantitative analysis geometric parameters and density parameters. Geometric parameters (Huang, 1981a) only measure the size and shape of the object under consideration whereas density parameters measure both the geometry and the grey level distribution of the object. 

Generally, traps are expected to yield field-effect mobilities which are both much lower than microscopic ones and varying with physical or electrical parameters. It would be worth taking this into account in CP TFT data. Apparently, low threshold voltages will require trap densities in the range 1017 cm-3, or less than 100 ppm, for trap depths of a few tenths of 1 eV. This does not seem impossible but the very low localized level densities sometimes quoted seem unrealistic, considering the poor structural order and limited chemical purity of most CPs to date. 

Figure 3 Franck-Condon weighted density of energy gaps between the donor and acceptor electronic energy levels. The parameters (A ) and indicate the first and second spectral moments, respectively. FCWD(O) shows the probability of zero energy gap entering the ET rate (Eq. [2]).

The parameters A, b, and S were obtained from a plot of rw versus 8v/d in the turbulent region. A incorporates the effects of fluid viscosity and density in the turbulent region, b accounts for changing diameter characteristics during turbulent flow, d is the inside diameter of the pipe, pf is the foam density, X is the density parameter that accounts for changes in density occurring as a result of changes in quality or pressure, V is the volume of foam, and S is indicative of the turbulence level and the deviation of fluid flow from Newtonian behavior. 

Fig. 4 3. Current DLTS for the quasi-discrete-level density of states of Fig. 16. Other parameters are the same as those given for Fig. 41.

---