Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Leaving groups ionization

Because of their crucial role in the ionization step, solvents have a profound effect on the rates of El reactions. These rates for a number of tertiary halides have been determined in a variety of solvents. For r-butyl chloride there are huge differences in the rates in water (log k = -. 54), ethanol (log k = -7.07), and diethyl ether (log k = — 2.1A)P Similarly, the rates of the El reaction of 1-methylcyclopentyl bromide range from 1 x 10 s in methanol to 2 x 10 s in hexane. Polar aprotic solvents such as DMSO (k = 2x lO s ) and acetonitrile (k = 9x 10 s ) are also conducive for ionization. The solvent properties that are most important are polarity and the ability to assist leaving group ionization. These, of course, are the same features that favor reactions, as we discussed in Section 3.8. [Pg.554]

Fig. 11. Reaction of ionized coupler and oxidized developer (Dev ) to produce the intermediate leuco dye. If X is a good leaving group, the reaction proceeds spontaneously to dye, and the coupler is said to be two-equivalent. If oxidation by a second molecule of oxidized developer is required, the... Fig. 11. Reaction of ionized coupler and oxidized developer (Dev ) to produce the intermediate leuco dye. If X is a good leaving group, the reaction proceeds spontaneously to dye, and the coupler is said to be two-equivalent. If oxidation by a second molecule of oxidized developer is required, the...
The ionization mechanism for nucleophilic substitution proceeds by rate-determining heterolytic dissociation of the reactant to a tricoordinate carbocation (also sometimes referred to as a carbonium ion or carbenium ion f and the leaving group. This dissociation is followed by rapid combination of the highly electrophilic carbocation with a Lewis base (nucleophile) present in the medium. A two-dimensional potential energy diagram representing this process for a neutral reactant and anionic nucleophile is shown in Fig. [Pg.264]

Stereochemical analysis can add detail to the mechanistic picture of the Sj l substitution reaction. The ionization mechanism results in foimation of a caibocation intermediate which is planar because of its hybridization. If the caibocation is sufficiently long-lived under the reaction conditions to diffirse away from the leaving group, it becomes symmetrically solvated and gives racemic product. If this condition is not met, the solvation is dissymmetric, and product with net retention or inversion of configuration may be obtained, even though an achiral caibocation is formed. The extent of inversion or retention depends upon the details of the system. Examples of this effect will be discussed in later sections of the chapter. [Pg.266]

The ionization and direct displacement mechanisms can be viewed as the extremes of a mechanistic continuum. At the 8 1 extreme, there is no covalent interaction between the reactant and the nucleophile in the transition state for cleavage of the bond to the leaving group. At the 8 2 extreme, the bond formation to the nucleophile is concerted with the bondbreaking step. In between these two limiting cases lies the borderline area, in which the degree of covalent interaction between the nucleophile and the reactant is intermediate between the two limiting cases. The concept of ion pairs is important in the consideration of... [Pg.269]

Winstein suggested that two intermediates preceding the dissociated caibocation were required to reconcile data on kinetics, salt effects, and stereochemistry of solvolysis reactions. The process of ionization initially generates a caibocation and counterion in proximity to each other. This species is called an intimate ion pair (or contact ion pair). This species can proceed to a solvent-separated ion pair, in which one or more solvent molecules have inserted between the caibocation and the leaving group but in which the ions have not diffused apart. The free caibocation is formed by diffusion away from the anion, which is called dissociation. [Pg.270]

Attack by a nucleophile or the solvent can occur at either of the ion pairs. Nucleophilic attack on the intimate ion pair would be expected to occur with inversion of configuration, since the leaving group would still shield the fiont side of the caibocation. At the solvent-separated ion pair stage, the nucleophile might approach fiom either fece, particularly in the case where solvent is the nucleophile. Reactions through dissociated carbocations should occur with complete lacemization. According to this interpretation, the identity and stereochemistry of the reaction products will be determined by the extent to which reaction occurs on the un-ionized reactant, the intimate ion pair, the solvent-separated ion pair, or the dissociated caibocation. [Pg.270]

Thus, in contrast to an ionization process from a neutral substrate, which initially generates an intimate ion pair, deamination reactions generate a cation which does not have an anion closely associated with it. Furthermore, the leaving group, molecular nitrogen, is very stable so that little, if any, nutleophilic participation is needed for bond cleavage. The... [Pg.306]

Attack ty acetate at C-1 of C-2 would be equally likely and would result in equal amounts of the enantiomeric acetates. The acetate ester would be exo because reaction must occur from the direction opposite the bridging interaction. The nonclassical ion can be formed directly only from the exo-brosylate because it has the proper anti relationship between the C(l)—C(6) bond and the leaving group. The bridged ion can be formed from the endo-brosylate only after an unassisted ionization. This would explain the rate difference between the exo and endo isomers. [Pg.328]

As depicted, the E2 mechanism involves a bimolecular transition state in which removal of a proton to the leaving group is concerted with departure of the leaving group. In contrast, the rate-determining step in the El mechanism is the unimolecular ionization of... [Pg.378]

In the El mechanism, the leaving group has completely ionized before C—H bond breaking occurs. The direction of the elimination therefore depends on the structure of the carbocation and the identity of the base involved in the proton transfer that follows C—X heterolysis. Because of the relatively high energy of the carbocation intermediate, quite weak bases can effect proton removal. The solvent m often serve this function. The counterion formed in the ionization step may also act as the proton acceptor ... [Pg.383]

The acetal might undergo ionization with formation of an alkoxide ion and a carbocation. In a second step, the alkoxide would be protonated. This mechanism is extremely rare, if not impossible, because an alkoxide ion is a poor leaving group. [Pg.454]

The scope of heteroaryne or elimination-addition type of substitution in aromatic azines seems likely to be limited by its requirement for a relatively unactivated leaving group, for an adjacent ionizable substituent or hydrogen atom, and for a very strong base. However, reaction via the heteroaryne mechanism may occur more frequently than is presently appreciated. For example, it has been recently shown that in the reaction of 4-chloropyridine with lithium piperidide, at least a small amount of aryne substitution accompanies direct displacement. The ratio of 4- to 3-substitution was 996 4 and, therefore, there was 0.8% or more pyridyne participation. Heteroarynes are undoubtedly subject to orientation and steric effects which frequently lead to the overwhelming predominance of... [Pg.152]

It should be mentioned here that if no other leaving group is present, sulfonyl can act as its own leaving group in hydroxide- or alkoxide-catalyzed elimination from sulfones. Carbanion formation is not involved in this but the promotion of the ionization of a C—H bond by the sulfonyl group is seen at the /1-carbon rather than the a-carbon, e.g. equation 21. [Pg.528]

It was mentioned above that weakly ionizing solvents promote syn elimination when the leaving group is uncharged. This is probably caused by ion pairing, which is greatest in nonpolar solvents. Ion pairing can... [Pg.1306]


See other pages where Leaving groups ionization is mentioned: [Pg.951]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.3575]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.3574]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.951]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.3575]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.3574]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.1304]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 , Pg.145 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.263 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.257 ]




SEARCH



Ionizable group

Ionization of a leaving group

Leaving groups ionization path

© 2024 chempedia.info