Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Least squares correlation coefficients

Note Problems 3 through 7 and 10 through 14 are, m part, given at two levels of sophistication and expectation The best" answers involve doing the part marked with an asterisk ( ) instead of the immediately preceding part The parts with an involve the use of the method of least squares, correlation coefficients, and confidence intervals for the slopes and intercepts, the preceding parts do not... [Pg.79]

The relationship between the concentration of an element in "whole" coal and the ash content can be used as a guide to the affinity of that element for, or incorporation in, the mineral matter or the carbonaceous material. If the concentration of an element increases with increasing ash content that element is presumed to be associated with the inorganic species that form ash, or in other words may be said to have an inorganic affinity. If the concentration shows no correlation with ash content, that element would be said to have an organic affinity. Linear least squares correlation coefficients were calculated for the concentrations of 39 elements... [Pg.188]

The ion-exchange data reported by Haddad and Cowie for a series of anions with phthalate/biphthalate additive at pH 5.3 (63) comprise an opportunity for testing equation 39 (as well as equations 41, 42a, and 42c see below). Accordingly, we provide in Table VI log hias a function of log for the systems they considered, as well as the mope m, the y-intercept b, and the absolute value of the linear least-squares correlation coefficient r, the data being derived from Figure 1 of their work. [Pg.26]

Figure 2.12. Linear correlation of the so-called peak area A, Eq. (2.44) and its actually measured reduced value A = A - 0.525 kPas, to the total Ohm s heat (Q) supplied during caUhration experiments, [2.23]. The statistical, i. e. least square correlation function is indicated in the diagram together with the correlation coefficient (R). Sensor gas Nj, 5.0, p = 0.16 MPa, T = 298 K, [2.23]. Figure 2.12. Linear correlation of the so-called peak area A, Eq. (2.44) and its actually measured reduced value A = A - 0.525 kPas, to the total Ohm s heat (Q) supplied during caUhration experiments, [2.23]. The statistical, i. e. least square correlation function is indicated in the diagram together with the correlation coefficient (R). Sensor gas Nj, 5.0, p = 0.16 MPa, T = 298 K, [2.23].
The experimental result is controlled in three ways. First, the accuracy of the initial 4-fluorophenol solution concentration is tested by a calculation of e, which must fall within the limits 238 5 1 mor cm at 25 °C. Second, the equilibrium constant calculated at 25 °C must match the value found during the construction of the pATbhx scale. In the latter work, Kc was the average of five or six determinations in which the base concentration was varied in order to complex various quantities of 4-fluorophenol. A new solution of base is made if the two values obtained from the concentration and temperature variation methods differ by more than 10%. Third, the least-squares treatment of the van t Hoff plot must give a squared correlation coefficient greater than 0.9990. [Pg.174]

Compound Sample Analytical technique Detection limit (ng/mL) Repeatability of four replicates at 2 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, %) Linear least squares correlation coefficienf... [Pg.215]

The least-squares technique can be extended to any number of variables as long as the equation is linear in its coefficients. The linear correlation ofj vs X can be extended to the correlation ofj vs multiple independent variables generating an equation of the form ... [Pg.245]

Once a linear relationship has been shown to have a high probability by the value of the correlation coefficient (r), then the best straight line through the data points has to be estimated. This can often be done by visual inspection of the calibration graph but in many cases it is far better practice to evaluate the best straight line by linear regression (the method of least squares). [Pg.145]

The use of a computer is very helpful to carry out a direct processing of the raw experimental data and to calculate the correlation coefficient and the least squares estimate of the rate constant. [Pg.59]

In the next section we derive the Taylor expansion of the coupled cluster cubic response function in its frequency arguments and the equations for the required expansions of the cluster amplitude and Lagrangian multiplier responses. For the experimentally important isotropic averages 7, 7i and yx we give explicit expressions for the A and higher-order coefficients in terms of the coefficients of the Taylor series. In Sec. 4 we present an application of the developed approach to the second hyperpolarizability of the methane molecule. We test the convergence of the hyperpolarizabilities with respect to the order of the expansion and investigate the sensitivity of the coefficients to basis sets and correlation treatment. The results are compared with dispersion coefficients derived by least square fits to experimental hyperpolarizability data or to pointwise calculated hyperpolarizabilities of other ab inito studies. [Pg.114]

When comparisons are to be drawn among scales derived with different criteria of physical validity, we believe this point to be especially appropriate. The SD is the explicit variable in the least-squares procedure, after all, while the correlation coefficient is a derivative providing at best a non linear acceptability scale, with good and bad correlations often crowded in the range. 9-1.0. The present work further provides strong confirmation of this conclusion. [Pg.16]

A difficulty with Hansch analysis is to decide which parameters and functions of parameters to include in the regression equation. This problem of selection of predictor variables has been discussed in Section 10.3.3. Another problem is due to the high correlations between groups of physicochemical parameters. This is the multicollinearity problem which leads to large variances in the coefficients of the regression equations and, hence, to unreliable predictions (see Section 10.5). It can be remedied by means of multivariate techniques such as principal components regression and partial least squares regression, applications of which are discussed below. [Pg.393]

Linearity is often assessed by examining the correlation coefficient (r) [or the coefficient of determination (r )] of the least-squares regression line of the detector response versus analyte concentration. A value of r = 0.995 (r = 0.99) is generally considered evidence of acceptable fit of the data to the regression line. Although the use of r or is a practical way of evaluating linearity, these parameters, by... [Pg.85]

Y is an edge correction ( ), and a equals fracture energy. Slope is computed by least squares analysis with correlation coefficient of fit. [Pg.125]

Any measure of the coordinate correlation is arbitrary. Here, the linear correlation coefficient r is used, largely because it is familiar. It measures the quality of a least-squares fit of a line to coordinates, with a magnitude that varies from 0 (for uncorrelated random coordinates) to 1 (for fully correlated coordinates lying on the line). For the correlated coordinates in Fig. 3.1 b, d, and f, theoretical relationships for r, that is, r =/(p1 p2) can be derived as shown in Appendix 3B. They show that r lies between the inclusive bounds of 1/2 and 1 for WEG, and between the inclusive bounds, 0 and 1, for FAN and PAR. [Pg.37]

As shown in Figure 6.21, excellent linearity was obtained, as represented by the high coefficient of correlation obtained for the least square linear regression. Similar results were obtained for the evaluation of autosampler accuracy when other analytes (propyl paraben and rhodamine 110 chloride) were employed in the determinations. Liu et al.9 conducted similar evaluations for the samples employed in the evaluation of the drug release rate profile of OROS with similar results to those discussed above. [Pg.173]

Coefficient of Correlation Values for Least Squares Regression of Standard Curves... [Pg.180]

An earlier paper from this laboratory showed that a plot of l°g(Qe) at 20 keV against log(Qp) at 100 keV for 19 negative and positive resists had a linear least squares slope of 1.30 with a correlation coefficient of 0.909 (14). Our log-log plot of Qe against Q at 90 and 125 keV for the MOTSS copolymers is shown in Figure 7. The linear least squares fit for the 125 keV plot has a slope of 1.05 with a correlation coefficient 0.992. Those for the 175 and 250 keV protons have the same slope within experimental error, but that for the 90 keV protons is higher, 1.11, with a correlation coefficient of 0.981. The reason that the slopes derived from the HS-MOTSS data... [Pg.205]


See other pages where Least squares correlation coefficients is mentioned: [Pg.272]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.676]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.72]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.511 ]




SEARCH



Coefficient correlation

Coefficients least-squares

© 2024 chempedia.info