Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Lead sampling procedures comparison

FBAs can also be estimated quantitatively by fluorescence spectroscopy, which is much more sensitive than the ultraviolet method but tends to be prone to error and is less convenient to use. Small quantities of impurities may lead to serious distortions of both emission and excitation spectra. Indeed, a comparison of ultraviolet absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra can yield useful information on the purity of an FBA. Different samples of an analytically pure FBA will show identical absorption and excitation spectra. Nevertheless, an on-line fluorescence spectroscopic method of analysis has been developed for the quantitative estimation of FBAs and other fluorescent additives present on a textile substrate. The procedure was demonstrated by measuring the fluorescence intensity at various excitation wavelengths of moving nylon woven fabrics treated with various concentrations of an FBA and an anionic sizing agent. It is possible to detect remarkably small differences in concentrations of the absorbed materials present [67]. [Pg.347]

Comparison of the results allows calculation of kj6/ki8. Obviously there are drawbacks to this procedure. The major one is the necessity of a costly and tedious isotopic synthesis of labeled materials. Optimally those compounds should be as close as possible to 100% enriched. This can seldom be achieved and using partially enriched samples requires substantial corrections to the raw data and increases experimental uncertainty. A rule of thumb used in remote labeling experiments is that the remote (reporting) position should be reasonably far from the reaction center (the phenolic oxygen in the present example). For the case where there is no isotope effect at the reporting site (e.g. no 15N-KIE), the double-label experiment leads directly to the isotope effect of interest. This is more probable when the reporting site is remote, (i.e. well isolated from the reaction coordinate). [Pg.224]

Hypothesis testing In classical statistics, a formal procedure for testing the longterm expected truth of a stated hypothesis. The statistical method involves comparison of two or more sets of sample data. On the basis of an expected distribution of the data, the test leads to a decision on whether to accept the null hypothesis (usually that there is no difference between the samples) or to reject that hypothesis and accept an alternative one (usually that there is some difference between the samples). [Pg.180]

An early synthesis of A5-palmitoy]-.S -[2,3-bis(palmitoyloxy)propyl]cysteine employed cysteine methyl ester, however, this leads to difficulties in the saponification step of the tri-palmitoylated residue. 96 The optimized procedure, in which the cystine di-fert-butyl ester is used, 90 is outlined in Scheme 6 after N-acylation with palmitoyl chloride, the ester is reduced to the cysteine derivative for S-alkylation with l-bromopropane-2,3-diol to yield chirally defined isomers if optically pure bromo derivatives are used. Esterification of the hydroxy groups is best carried out with a 1.25-fold excess of palmitic acid, DCC, and DMAP. The use of a larger excess of palmitoyl chloride is not recommended due to purification problems. The diastereomeric mixture can be separated by silica gel chromatography using CH2Cl2/EtOAc (20 1) as eluent and the configuration was assigned by comparison with an optically pure sample obtained with 2R)- -bromopropane-2,3-diol. [Pg.346]

Sabe and Rauret [33] and Drolc et al. [34], however based upon the Eurachem/ CITAC guide on traceability [3]. In their examples, all authors take into account specific steps or influences in the analytical procedure which can lead to a broken chain of comparisons, such as sampling and sample treatment or preparation steps. Some authors have reported on uncertainties associated with sampling in particular [35,36]. [Pg.751]

SPE. However, LLE may reduce the sample loss, experiment procedures and errors, and save time in comparison to SPE [8, 25, 28], In contrast, if a larger amount of sample is available, e.g., 2-10 mL of urine or 1-10 L of environmental water, SPE is a better choice, because it concentrates the sample and minimizes the interferences from other materials, leading to a higher sensitivity and selectivity of the method or test [34, 37, 39], The sample extraction throughput can be significantly enhanced by using automated 96-well SPE plates [31,49],... [Pg.259]

A number of experimental alternatives to traditional IR transmission spectroscopy are suitable for overcoming some of these complicating experimental factors. In the technique of diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) (Hartauer et al. 1992 Neville et al. 1992) the sample is dispersed in a matrix of powdered alkali halide, a procedure which is less likely to lead to polymorphic transformations or loss of solvent than the more aggressive grinding necessary for mull preparation or pressure required to make a pellet (Roston et al. 1993). For these reasons, Threlfall (1995) suggests that DRIFTS should be the method of choice for the initial IR examination of polymorphs. He has also discussed the possible use of attenuated total reflection (ATR) methods in the examination of polymorphs and provided a comparison and discussion of the results obtained on sulphathiazole polymorphs from spectra run on KBr disks, Nujol mulls and ATR. [Pg.129]


See other pages where Lead sampling procedures comparison is mentioned: [Pg.260]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.1541]    [Pg.1666]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.382]   


SEARCH



Lead sampling procedures

Sample comparison

Sampling procedure

© 2024 chempedia.info