Large-scale reactor technology

The development of microfabrication technologies for ceramic and metallic materials has significantly promoted, during the last decade, research in the field of microreactors, characterized by higher specific productivity, better control of operating conditions and a higher standard of intrinsic safety than large-scale reactors [33, 34]. 

Small-scale reactors have more advantages than large-scale reactors in variety of energy utilization, construction, maintenance and adoption of innovative technologies, while the latter have scale merits in construction cost. The nuclear energy utilization of small-scale reactors are ship propulsion, electricity generation, heat supply, and sea water desalination, etc. Construction and maintenance for small-scale reactors can be made in factories exclusive use for them, but not at the site of the plant. In small-scale reactors, the safety can be enhanced sometimes by new technologies. 

Chloroaluminate laboratory preparations proved to be easily extrapolated to large scale. These chloroaluminate salts are corrosive liquids in the presence of protons. When exposed to moisture, they produce hydrochloric acid, similarly to aluminium chloride. However, this can be avoided by the addition of some proton scavenger such as alkylaluminium derivatives. In Difasol technology, for example, carbon-steel reactors can be used with no corrosion problem. 

Large-scale ultrasonic irradiations are extant technology. Liquid processing rates of >200 L/min are routinely accessible from a variety of modular, flow reactors with acoustic powers of tens of KW per unit (14). The industrial uses of these units include 1) degassing of liquids, 2) dispersion of solids into liquids, 3) emulsification of immiscible liquids and 4) large-scale cell disruption. While these units are of limited use for most laboratory research, they are of potential importance in eventual industrial application of sonochemical reactions. 

Large-scale gasification reactor technology based on EF gasification from (a) General Electric (GE Texaco process) and (b) Conoco-Phillips (E-Gas). (Adapted from Meier, D. Faix, O. Fast pyrolysis A route for energy and chemicals from wood—fluidized vs. ablative pyrolysis. In Wood and Biomass Utilization for the Carbon Uptake, Seoul National University, Seoul, 2005, pp. 55-68.)... 

---