Kinetics from surface

INS Ion neutralization An inert gas hitting surface is spectroscopy [147] neutralized with the ejection of an Auger electron from a surface atom Spectroscopy of Emitted Ions or Molecules Kinetics of surface reactions chemisorption... 

AES Auger electron spectroscopy After the ejection of an electron by absorption of a photon, an atom stays behind as an unstable Ion, which relaxes by filling the hole with an electron from a higher shell. The energy released by this transition Is taken up by another electron, the Auger electron, which leaves the sample with an element-specific kinetic energy. Surface composition, depth profiles... 

FIG. 16-27 Constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. Ordinant is cfor nfexcept for axial dispersion for which individual curves are labeled a, axial dispersion h, external mass transfer c, pore diffusion (spherical particles) d, surface diffusion (spherical particles) e, linear driving force approximation f, reaction kinetics. [from LeVan in Rodrigues et al. (eds.), Adsorption Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dor drecht, The Nether lands, 1989 r eprinted with permission.]... 

Fine structure extending several hundred eV in kinetic energy below a CEELS peak, analogous to EXAFS, have been observed in REELS. Bond lengths of adsorbed species can be determined from Surface Electron Energy-Loss Fine Structure (SEELFS) using a modified EXAFS formalism. 

Another important catalytic reaction that has been most extensively studied is CO oxidation catalyzed by noble metals. In situ STM studies of CO oxidation have focused on measuring the kinetic parameters of this surface reaction. Similar to the above study of hydrogen oxidation, in situ STM studies of CO oxidation are often conducted as a titration experiment. Metal surfaces are precovered with oxygen atoms that are then removed by exposure to a constant CO pressure. In the titration experiment, the kinetics of surface reaction can be simplified and the reaction rate directly measured from STM images. 

In order to test the reversibility of metal-bacteria interactions, Fowle and Fein (2000) compared the extent of desorption estimated from surface complexation modeling with that obtained from sorption-desorption experiments. Using B. subtilis these workers found that both sorption and desorption of Cd occurred rapidly, and the desorption kinetics were independent of sorption contact time. Steady-state conditions were attained within 2 h for all sorption reactions, and within 1 h for all desorption reactions. The extent of sorption or desorption remained constant for at least 24 h and up to 80 h for Cd. The observed extent of desorption in the experimental systems was in accordance with the amount estimated from a surface complexation model based on independently conducted adsorption experiments. 

Figure 2.11 Thermal desorption spectra of silver from the close-packed surface of ruthenium for different initial Ag coverages. Desorption from the second layer of silver occurs at lower temperatures, indicating that Ag-Ag bonds are weaker than Ag-Ru bonds. Note the exponential increase of the low temperature sides of the peaks, indicating that the desorption follows zero-order kinetics (from Niemantsverdriet et al. [18]).

An interesting approach to measuring rates of electron transfer reactions at electrodes is through the study of surface bound molecules (43-451. Molecules can be attached to electrode surfaces by irreversible adsorption or the formation of chemical bonds (461. Electron transfer kinetics to and from surface bound species is simplified because there is no mass transport and because the electron transfer distance is controlled to some degree. 

Furthermore, an Avrami exponent of 1 could also be obtained from surface nucleation. So far, no measurements are available in the literature of the nu-cleation kinetics as a function of droplet or MD size, and therefore the scaling between the relevant time constant associated with the nucleation event and the MD dimensions is unknown. 

As we shall see (Chapter 4), the kinetics of surface complex formation is often related to the rate of H20 loss from the aquo cation. This is another (indirect) evidence for inner-sphere complex formation. 

Solubility and kinetics methods for distinguishing adsorption from surface precipitation have the common features of being essentially macroscopic in nature and of not utilizing a direct examination of sorbed material. The essential difference between an adsorbate and a surface precipitate lies with molecular structure, however, and it is inevitable that methodologies not equipped to explore that structure directly will produce ambiguous results requiring ad hoc assumptions in order to interpret them. The principal technique for... 

Solubility and kinetics methods for distinguishing adsorption from surface precipitation suffer from the fundamental weakness of being macroscopic approaches that do not involve a direct examination of the solid phase. Information about the composition of an aqueous solution phase is not sufficient to permit a clear inference of a sorption mechanism because the aqueous solution phase does not determine uniquely the nature of its contiguous solid phases, even at equilibrium (49). Perhaps more important is the fact that adsorption and surface precipitation are essentially molecular concepts on which strictly macroscopic approaches can provide no unambiguous data (12, 21). Molecular concepts can be studied only by molecular methods. 

Summary on Surface Kinetics. From this discussion we conclude that it is good enough to use the simplest available correlating rate expression, hence first-order or nth-order kinetics, to represent the surface reaction. 

Liquid Corresponding temperature 0-7 of T,. 6 total surface energy per molecule X10 ergs X internal latent heat of vaporisation per molecule X10 ergs j=X-e energy changed from potential to kinetic -when molecule jumps from surface to vapour, per molecule x 10 ergs X... 

A general issue in these studies is that the preparation method is quite different from ones used to prepare real catalysts to be tested under practical conditions. This is an important issue, because there is the need to link the micro-kinetic and surface mechanism studies to the catalytic behaviour under real conditions, and to use the knowledge generated by the fundamental investigations to prepare industrially relevant catalysts. 

---