Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Joining parameters

Figure 2.7. Effect of the joining parameter J on the movement of ingredient A in different... Figure 2.7. Effect of the joining parameter J on the movement of ingredient A in different...
In what follows, unless specified otherwise the breaking and joining parameters, Pb and J, will be assigned the neutral values Pb = TO and J = 1.0 appropriate to hard-sphere (billiard ball) collisions. In some cases it will be of interest to depart from this simple model and to alter these values to find the influences of intermolecular attractions and repulsions on the results. [Pg.127]

It is now interesting to see if changing the breaking probability Pb(A,B) or the joining parameter J(A,B) affects the reaction rate. For this we first set up the situation as in Example 8.2 above, with a 100 x 100 grid and 500 A and 500 B cells, but now set Pb(AB) = 0.5 (instead of Pb = 1.0). This means that the A and B cells in contact with each other have some tendency to stay in contact. [Pg.135]

Figure 8 Illustration of the joining parameter J. (a) Movement of cell occupant A in three directions with probabilities north 0.153, east 0.421, south 0.266, and west 0.000. (b) Movement of A in two directions with probabilities north 0.000, east 0.484, south 0.266, and west 0.000. (c) Movement of A in one direction with probabilities north 0.000, east 0.677, south 0.000, and west 0.000. The parameters used are Pb(AB) = 0.8, /(AB) = 0.5, /(AC) = 2.0, absG(A) = 0, and GD(AB) = 0. Figure 8 Illustration of the joining parameter J. (a) Movement of cell occupant A in three directions with probabilities north 0.153, east 0.421, south 0.266, and west 0.000. (b) Movement of A in two directions with probabilities north 0.000, east 0.484, south 0.266, and west 0.000. (c) Movement of A in one direction with probabilities north 0.000, east 0.677, south 0.000, and west 0.000. The parameters used are Pb(AB) = 0.8, /(AB) = 0.5, /(AC) = 2.0, absG(A) = 0, and GD(AB) = 0.
When /(AB) = 1, and all adjacent j cells to the occupant are empty, the probability of moving in any direction is 0.25 of its free movement probability. This reduced joining parameter agrees with the intuitively reasonable assumption that any occupant should not be biased on any direction (unless gravity is considered). [Pg.250]

Note some particularities of new USCT method. At first, data collection and search of areas with anomalous (inhomogeneous)SD of acoustic parameters (velocities of spreading of US waves) is joined. As a sought image, on which anomalies is revealed, it is offered total image B (r), which practically is the low frequency copy of restored fimction g(f). As PMF SD of... [Pg.251]

Iiifomiation about the behaviour of the 3D Ising ferromagnet near the critical point was first obtained from high- and low-temperatnre expansions. The expansion parameter in the high-temperatnre series is tanli K, and the corresponding parameter in the low-temperatnre expansion is exp(-2A ). A 2D square lattice is self-dual in the sense that the bisectors of the line joining the lattice points also fomi a square lattice and the coefficients of the two expansions, for the 2D square lattice system, are identical to within a factor of two. The singularity occurs when... [Pg.539]

The toughness of interfaces between immiscible amorphous polymers without any coupling agent has been the subject of a number of recent studies [15-18]. The width of a polymer/polymer interface is known to be controlled by the Flory-Huggins interaction parameter x between the two polymers. The value of x between a random copolymer and a homopolymer can be adjusted by changing the copolymer composition, so the main experimental protocol has been to measure the interface toughness between a copolymer and a homopolymer as a function of copolymer composition. In addition, the interface width has been measured by neutron reflection. Four different experimental systems have been used, all containing styrene. Schnell et al. studied PS joined to random copolymers of styrene with bromostyrene and styrene with paramethyl styrene [17,18]. Benkoski et al. joined polystyrene to a random copolymer of styrene with vinyl pyridine (PS/PS-r-PVP) [16], whilst Brown joined PMMA to a random copolymer of styrene with methacrylate (PMMA/PS-r-PMMA) [15]. The results of the latter study are shown in Fig. 9. [Pg.233]

FIGURE 6.2 The amide or peptide bond planes are joined by the tetrahedral bonds of the ff-carbon. The rotation parameters are p and Ip. The conformation shown corresponds to clockwise rotation as viewed from Starting from 0°, a rotation of 180° in the clockwise direction ( + 180°) is equivalent to a rotation of 180° in the counterclockwise direction (—180°). (truing G s)... [Pg.161]

For bonded atoms, the off-diagonal terms (where i j) are taken to depend on tjje type and length of the bond joining the atoms on which the basis functions y- and Xj 0 centred. The entire integral is written as a constant, 0ij, which is not the same as the fixY in Hiickel 7r-electron theory. The are taken to be parameters, fixed by calibration against experiment. It is usual to set Pij to zero when the pair of atoms are not formally bonded. [Pg.139]

The resultant atomic arrangement of 4 Al13Si5O20(OH, F)1S01 in the unit cube has the following analytical description, the parameter values being so chosen as to distort the octahedra slightly in order to join them to undistorted silicon tetrahedra ... [Pg.548]

The first of the two trajectory or interaction rules is the joining trajectory parameter, J(AB), which defines the propensity of movement of an ingredient A toward or away from a second ingredient B, when the two are separated by... [Pg.18]

We have defined above a way of quantifying the structure of water based on the profile of fx values that encode the number of each possible joined state of a molecule. It is now possible to use this profile as a measure of the structure of water at different temperatures. As an application of this metric it is possible to relate this to physical properties. We have shown the results of our earlier work in Table 3.3. The reader is encouraged to repeat these and to explore other structure-property relationships using the fx as single or multiple variables. A unified parameter derived from the five fx values expressed as a fraction of 1.0, might be the Shannon information content. This could be calculated from all the data created in the above studies and used as a single variable in the analysis of water and other liquid properties. [Pg.56]

In order, for the two liquids to separate into two phases, they must be very weakly soluble in each other. When exposed to each other by mixing or shaking in a separatory funnel, they may not interpenetrate each other s realm to any extent. At the molecular level, we infer that the two species of molecules have no significant affinity for each other, rather they are predominantly attracted to other molecules with the same structure. To model this aversion, the joining and breaking rules must encode this behavior. The cells of liquids X and Y must respond to rules typified by those shown in the parameter setup tables below. With these rules we anticipate that liquid X will favor associating with other X molecules, while molecule Y will be found predominantly among other Y molecules. [Pg.74]

In this example, a solute is introduced into the system described in Example 5.1. We introduce 50 molecules of solute, S, by subtracting 25 cells each from liquids X and Y. Joining and breaking parameters are selected for the SX and SY relationships, shown in Parameter Setup 5.2. [Pg.77]

A series of rules describing the breaking, / B,and joining, J, probabilities must be selected to operate the cellular automata model. The study of Kier was driven by the rules shown in Table 6.6, where Si and S2 are the two solutes, B, the stationary cells, and W, the solvent (water). The boundary cells, E, of the grid are parameterized to be noninteractive with the water and solutes, i.e., / b(WE) = F b(SE) = 1.0 and J(WE) = J(SE) = 0. The information about the gravity parameters is found in Chapter 2. The characteristics of Si, S2, and B relative to each other and to water, W, can be interpreted from the entries in Table 6.6. [Pg.96]

In the more general case of joint control of molecular weight by both transfer and radical termination, it is appropriate to consider that two distributions are formed simultaneously. One of these distributions consists of molecules terminated by chain transfer the other of pairs of chains joined by the combination of radicals. For any conversion increment, the two coexisting distributions will depend on the same parameter p representing the probability of continuation of the growth of any chain, i.e. [Pg.336]


See other pages where Joining parameters is mentioned: [Pg.16]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.2178]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.2178]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.398]   


SEARCH



Join, joining

Joining parameter water model

Joining trajectory parameter

Joins

© 2024 chempedia.info