Ionic compounds common structures

Isomerism is commonly encountered in covalent compounds but is rare among ionic compounds. Isomers can be grouped under two major categories, namely structural isomers and. stereoisomers [48, p. 45]. 

KoC is an important parameter which describes the potential for movement or mobility of pesticides in soil, sediment and groundwater. Because of the structural complexity of these agrochemical molecules, the above simple relationship which considers only the chemical s hydrophobicity may fail for polar and ionic compounds. The effects of pH, soil properties, mineral surfaces and other factors influencing sorption become important. Other quantities, KD (sorption partition coefficient to the whole soil on a dry weight basis) and KqM (organic matter-water partition coefficient) are also commonly used to describe the extent of sorption. K0M is often estimated as 0.56 KoC, implying that organic matter is 56% carbon. 

As mentioned above, the most commonly used method for the analysis of cationic surfactants has been HPLC coupled with conductometric, UV, or fluorescence detectors, the latter typically utilizing post-column ion-pair formation for enhanced sensitivity. Analysis by GC is only possible for cationic compounds after a derivatisation step [33] because of the ionic character of this compound. However, structural information might be lost. 

Introduction. A number of common structures, ideally corresponding to a 1 1 stoichiometry, are presented in this chapter. Some of them are not specifically characteristic of intermetallic compounds only. The CsCl and NaCl types, for instance, are observed for several kinds of chemical compounds (from typical ionic to metallic phases). Notice that for a number of prototypes a few derivative structures have also been considered and described, underlining crystal analogies and relationships even if with a change in the reference stoichiometry. 

One hundred and forty-four meso-ionic heterocycles of type A (13, 19) and 84 meso-ionic heterocycles of type B (14, 20) are possible. The numbers of these two types which are now known (Table I type A, 44 representatives) and (Table II type B, 8 representatives) encourage us to put forward the proposal that the term meso-ionic should in future be restricted to five-membered heterocycles belonging to type A (13, 19) and type B (14,20). This clear restriction upon the use of the term meso-ionic has obvious advantages. It still embraces 228 different classes of heterocycles with a common structural characteristic, and the many types of meso-ionic compounds included in the authoritative review by Ohta and Kato " are included. Needless to say, the restriction upon the definition of the term meso-ionic to five-mem red heterocycles of type A and type B still includes, for example, benz derivatives such as the compounds 67, 71, 110, 123, 133, 151, 206, 209, 226, 255, and 258. 

As the valency of the metal increases, the bonding in these simple binary compounds becomes more covalent and the highly symmetrical structures characteristic of the simple ionic compounds occur far less frequently, with molecular and layer structures being common. Many thousands of inorganic crystal structures exist, ffere we describe just a few of those that are commonly encountered and those that occur in later chapters. 

Among binary (i.e., two-element) ionic compounds, six simple types of unit cell structures are commonly encountered, although many more exist ... 

Solid phases of binary systems, like the liquid phases, are very commonly of variable composition. Here, as with the liquid, the stable range of composition is larger, the more similar the two components are. This of course is quite c-ontrary to the chemists notion of definite chemical composition, definite structural formulas, etc., but those notions are really of extremely limited application. It happens that the solid phases in the system water—ionic compound are often of rather definite composition, and it is largely from this rather special case that the idea of definite compositions in solids has become so firmly rooted. In such a system, there are normally two solid phases ice and the crystalline ionic compound. Ice can take up practically none of any ionic compound, so that it has practically no range of compositions. And many ionic crystals... 

Decide whether the bonds are ionic or covalent or both. (Later we shall see that this distinction is not at all sharp, but in most of the common structures, a decision from the relative positions of the atoms in the Periodic Table is possible.) Some compounds may have both ionic and covalent bonds for example, in Na2S04, the bonds between sulfur and oxygen are considered eovaient, whereas the bonds between oxygen and sodium are ionic. All bonds in a volatile compound are generally represented as being covalent. 

Suppose we consider the structures of a few common crystals in light of the above requirements. Figure 2-18 illustrates the unit cells of two ionic compounds, CsCl and NaCl. These structures, both cubic, are common to many other crystals and, wherever they occur, are referred to as the CsCl structure and the NaCl structure. In considering a crystal structure, one of the most important things to determine is its Bravais lattice, since that is the basic framework on which the crystal is built and because, as we shall see later, it has a profound effect on the way in which that crystal diffracts x-rays. 

At present a large variety of solid compounds are called Zintl phases. The name Zintl phase was introduced by Laves According to Laves, Zintl phases are those intermetallic compounds which crystallize in typical non-metal crystal structures. For these compounds one expects an ionic contribution to the chemical bond. This definition has been extended to a large number of solid compounds formed by alkali or alkaline earth metals with metallic or semimetallic elements of the fourth, fifth and partly third group of the Periodic Table for which common structural and bonding properties have been found. The crystal structures and chemical properties of these compounds have been studied extensively . ... 

A majority of halides and oxides have the structures expected for largely ionic compounds, with the metal in octahedral coordination (see Topic D3. especially Fig. 1). Common oxide structures are rocksalt (e g. MnO, NiO), corundum (see Topic G5. e.g. Cr203, Fe203) and rutile (e g. Ti02, Cr02). 

As mentioned above, X-ray structures only give a precise knowledge of the distances between the atoms. While this is not so important for pure metals, as the interatomic distance is simply divided by two to obtain the metallic radius, this simple method will not work for ionic compounds. To begin, it is assumed that the individual ions are spherical and in contact. The strategy then used to derive ionic radii is to take the radius of one commonly occurring ion, such as the oxide ion, O2-, as a standard. Other consistent radii can then be derived by subtracting the standard radius from measured inter-ionic distances. 

---