Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Ionic components, determination

The possibility of measuring the Volta potential in the system metal-solid-state electrolyte and using the data obtained to determine ionic components of the free lattice energy has been shown in our papers. Earlier, Copeland and Seifert measured the Volta potential between Ag and solid AgNOj in the temperature range between 190 and 280 °C. They investigated the potential jump during the phase transition from solid to liquid salt. [Pg.27]

One important advantage of the polarized interface is that one can determine the relative surface excess of an ionic species whose counterions are reversible to a reference electrode. The adsorption properties of an ionic component, e.g., ionic surfactant, can thus be studied independently, i.e., without being disturbed by the presence of counterionic species, unlike the case of ionic surfactant adsorption at nonpolar oil-water and air-water interfaces [25]. The merits of the polarized interface are not available at nonpolarized liquid-liquid interfaces, because of the dependency of the phase-boundary potential on the solution composition. [Pg.121]

A conductivity detector measures the electrical conductivity of the HPLC eluent stream and is amenable to low-level determination (ppm and ppb levels) of ionic components such as anions, metals, organic acids, and surfactants. It is the primary detection mode for ion chromatography. Manufacturers include Dionex, Alltech, Shimadzu, and Waters. [Pg.513]

The volatility of ammonia can be significantely affected by high concentrations of dissolved ions in the liquid phase. In sodium acetate the volatility increases by a factor of 1.9 at 25 wt % of salt. In sodium hydroxide the volatility is enhanced to a lesser degree with an increase of 1.25 at 22.5 wt % NaOH. Both electrolytes produce ions with only one electronic charge, but their effects on the volatility of ammonia are significantly different. Thus the effects of various ionic components must be studied individually in order to determine their effect on the volatility of NH3. [Pg.225]

The changing value of the ionic mobility is a molecular probe that can be used to quantitatively monitor the viscosity using the relation a = Atj x of the resin dining cure up to gel. The dipolar component of the loss at higher frequencies can then be determined by subtracting the ionic component. [Pg.141]

Here, grs is a parameter that is quantified either from experimental data, or is calculated by an ab initio method as one-half of the singlet-triplet excitation energy gap of the r—s bond. In terms of the qualitative theory in Chapter 3, grs is therefore identical to the key quantity —2(3 5 - This empirical quantity incorporates the effect of the ionic components of the bond, albeit in an implicit way. (c) The Hamiltonian matrix element between two determinants differing by one spin permutation between orbitals r and s is equal to grs. Only close neighbor grs elements are taken into account all other off-diagonal matrix elements are set to zero. An example of a Hamiltonian matrix is illustrated in Scheme 8.1 for 1,3-butadiene. [Pg.224]

Here the first two determinants are the determinantal form of the Heitler-London function (eq 1), and represent a purely covalent interaction between the atoms. The remaining determinants represent zwitterionic structures, H-H+ and H+H, and contribute 50% to the wave function. The same constitution holds for any interatomic distance. This weight of the ionic structures is clearly too much at equilibrium distance, and becomes absurd at infinite separation where the ionic component is expected to drop to zero. Qualitatively, this can be corrected by including a second configuration where both electrons occupy the antibonding orbital, Gu, i.e. the doubly excited configuration. The more elaborate wave function T ci is shown in eq. 4, where C and C2 are coefficients of the two MO configurations ... [Pg.190]

The availability of r° (or pAg) curves at several electrolyte concentrations enables the establishment of the Esin-Markov coefficient 3.4.14) and the ensuing determination of the ionic components of charge, integrating 3.4.16] l Figures 3.45 and 3.46 give results of the former and the latter, respectively. [Pg.379]

Measurements of a number of acids have been made in seawater, and equations are available to determine the elfect of salinity, temperature, and pressure on the dissociation constants (Millero, 2001). The most widely studied acids in seawater are those related to the carbonate system. Most of these studies have been made in artihcial seawater that contains the major ionic components (Na, Mg +, Ca +, K+, Cr, SO, F ). It was thought that constants determined in this artificial seawater could be used in real seawater. Although this is the case for most acid-base systems, as will be discussed below, this is not the case for the carbonate system (Mojica and Millero, 2002). [Pg.2862]

We note that, because monolayer and solution are electronetutral, the surface composition is completely determined by adsorption and depletion of electroneutral entites. Because of this, only two rd/i terms suffice. Some authors prefer to write the r.h.s. in terms of ionic components (r .d/i,., dyU., +, etc.) which gives one term more but also an auxiliary condition, viz. that of electroneutrality. It is to a certain extent a matter of taste which choice is preferred. From an academic point of view it is not elegant at the veiy outset to make the concession of introducing single ionic activities, l.e. thermodynamically inoperable quantities. On the other hand, in the later elaborations, working with single ionic activities is often unavoidable, particularly when the system contains many components. We discussed this matter in some detail in sec. II.3.4. Anyhow, we shall start with [4.6.6] and see how far we get. [Pg.539]

In this model, the ionic component, Vion(0 = is determined by the Moliere-ion function <(>Mi(O (i-e., 0ion — which -following the form of the original Moliere function - is expressed as... [Pg.58]

The number of independent components in a solution composed of electrolyte Y, dissolved in a nonelectrolyte solvent is determined by the restrictions placed on making up the solution. If it is specified that the electrolyte be added to the solvent, the number of independent components is 2 if the ions may be added independently, subject to the restraint of electroneutrality, the number of independent components is r (r-1 ionic components and the solvent). [Pg.190]


See other pages where Ionic components, determination is mentioned: [Pg.390]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.781]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.190]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Component determinative

Ionic component

Ionic determinant

© 2024 chempedia.info