Involute spiral

Scroll compressors are currently used in relatively smaU-sized installations, predominantly for residential air-conditioning (up to 50 kW). They are recognized for low-noise operation. Two scrolls (free-standing, involute spirals bounded on one side by a flat plate) facing each other form a closed volume while one moves in a controlled orbit around a fixed point on the other, fixed scroll. 

Thus the contour of constant 0(r, 6, t) is a spiral and coincides with the asymptotic form of an involute spiral as oo. Experimentally observed spiral waves also have this feature. 

Thus the potential is made repulsive near the core in contrast to Uq, while it is attractive and approaches C/q far from the core. Interestingly enough, U r) looks something like the interatomic potential. Since U remains essentially the same as L/fl for large r, the asymptotic wave pattern far from the core, where R is nearly constant, is again determined from (6.5.12), that is, an approximate involute spiral. The only new feature here is that the maximum eigenvalue A is made finite by virtue of the strong repulsive part in the potential near the core. 

Our theory is one of a progressive spiral involution of time toward a concrescence, rather than a theory of a static hierarchy of waves, eternally expressed on many levels. This is because the terminal positions in the King Wen wave naturally quantify as zero states. The natural consequence of this is that the terminal sections of an epoch do not contribute to the valuation assigned to lower levels of that particular section of the hierarchy. This results in a progressive drop of valuations toward the zero state as any epoch enters its terminal phase. Only in the situation of final concrescence does the valuation on all levels actually become zero. In fact, the quantified definition of absolute concrescence is that it is the zero point in the quantified wave-hierarchy. 

As age involution progresses, lymphatic tissue gradually decreases, the cortex thins, Hassall s corpuscles become more prominent, and fatty replacement of the organ ensues. Many of the Hassall s corpuscles become calcified or cystic. Some of the epithelial cells may acquire a spiral shape. In... 

Fig. 9.1. Different representations of a rigidly rotating spiral wave, (a) Involute of a hole, (b) Solution of the kinematical equation with linear velocity-curvature relationship, (c) Archimedean spiral, (d) Superposition of the three wave fronts where the dotted, dashed and solid lines correspond to (a), (b), and (c), respectively. Far from the rotation center the fronts practically coincide.

Figure 7.3 A set of logarithmic spirals, such as the golden, planetary spiral with divergence angle 2t, may serve as a model of Godd s compass of inertia, going through an odd number of involutions...

Fig. 6. Fit of an Archimedian spiral (A) and an involute of a circle (B) to the pixels with the maximum grey levels in a spiral pattern observed in a 4.5 x 4.5 mm area (from [36]).

The first kinematical model for the description of processes in excitable media was proposed in 1946 by Wiener and Rosenblueth [6]. In this model it is assumed that each small segment of an oriented curve, representing the excitation front, moves in its normal direction with the same constant velocity. It was shown in [6] that such a curve rotating around an obstacle forms a spiral which constitutes an involute of this obstacle and approaches the Archimedean spiral far from it. 

Using these simple geometrical arguments, Wiener and Rosenblueth came to the conclusion that the excitation front which rotates around any obstacle (even with a more complicated shape than a circle) must represents its involute. They pointed that at distances that are much larger than the radius of the obstacle, the involute approaches the Archimedean spiral with the constant pitch equal to the perimeter of this hole. 

In this section we derive the analytical solutions for a spiral wave steadily rotating around a circular obstacle and for a free spiral wave and investigate their stability. It was found in Section 2, following Wiener and Rosenblueth [6], that a steadily rotating spiral wave is an involute of the obstacle s boundary and approaches an Archimedean spiral far from it. However, the conditions of applicability of the WR approximation break down near the tip of a steadily rotating spiral because the curvature diverges there. Therefore we must use... 

The form of the spiral differs from the Wiener-Rosenblueth involute given by koipoo l/lo) only within a distance about Iq, from the boundary of the obstacle. 

The form of the steadily rotating free spiral is given by the natural equation (28) where ko should be replaced by kc. It differs from an involute of the core only within a distance lo from the free end, obtained by the substitution of kc instead of ko into (29). This distance is much smaller than the core radius Ro when the conditions of applicability of the kinematical approximation are satisfied. Using (29) and (32) one finds lo/Ro Dkc/Vo < 1. 

---