Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Inversion barriers performance

As with conformational energy differences, SYBYL and MMFF molecular mechanics show marked differences in performance for rotation/inversion barriers. MMFF provides a good account of singlebond rotation barriers. Except for hydrogen peroxide and hydrogen disulfide, all barriers are well within 1 kcal/mol of their respective experimental values. Inversion barriers are more problematic. While the inversion barrier in ammonia is close to the experimental value, barriers in trimethylamine and in aziridine are much too large, and inversion barriers in phosphine and (presumably) trimethylphosphine are smaller than their respective experimental quantities. Overall,... [Pg.282]

Recently Ford and co-workers performed calculations of the structures and relative stabilities of a series of 20 polycyclic nitrenium ions at the HF/6-31G(d) level.Except for symmetrical cases, all ions existed as distinct syn and anti isomers defined by the configuration of the N—H bond with respect to the unsymmetrical aryl group. The energies of configurational isomers differed by between 0.2 and 3.7 kcal/mol. Inversion barriers through a linear transition state were fairly constant in the range from... [Pg.246]

When the above-mentioned ring expansion with diazomethane 74) of trimethyl-dioxo[2.2]metacyclophane 65 (methylation was necessary to increase the inversion barrier to > 130 kJ) was performed in the presence of optically active alcohols at —60 °C, asymmetric induction occurred to an extent of ca. 40% ee (enantiomeric excess as determined by nmr-spectroscopy in the presence of chiral shift reagents)85). (+)-DibutyI tartrate favoured the dextrorotatory diketone 66 ([a]D 160° for the optically pure product) — the isomeric 67 was formed only with 3% ee (—)-ethyl lactate on the other hand led to an excess of (+)-67 ([a]D +240°) but gave (+)-66 with only 10% ee85). [Pg.43]

Other important properties are the barrier performance, which is defined as the resistance to the transport of permeant molecules and thus is the inverse of permeability, and the selectivity of a polymer between two types of molecules, which is the ratio of its permeabilities to those molecules, e.g. Po2/Pn2 is the selectivity between oxygen and nitrogen. [Pg.656]

Up to now all non-empirical computations of barriers to nitrogen inversion (except for ammonia) have been performed within the Hartree-Fock SCF—LCAO—MO theoretical method. Only a brief summary of the problems involved in calculating energy barriers in general and inversion barriers in particular will be given here. A more detailed discussion of the theoretical (correlation and relativistic effects) and computational (basis... [Pg.82]

It is of importance to note that, using this method, inversion barriers may be computed for molecules which Eire too reactive or too unstable (for instance, H2N—SiH3, H2N—F, oxaziridine, CH2=N—H etc... ) or have barriers too high for experimental determinations to be performed. In addition it is possible to study the geometry (which cannot be obtained... [Pg.83]

The barrier performance [4] of a polymer can be defined as its resistance to the transport of penetrant molecules, i.e., as the inverse of its permeability. A lower value of P therefore indicates better performance as a barrier material. [Pg.592]

Summary Employing temperature-dependent dynamic NMR spectroscopy we have been able to measure both the activation enthalpy and entropy of inversion processes. Moreover we have performed a systematic study of the influence of the substituent groups, the nature of the cation, and solvent effects on the height of the inversion barrier. [Pg.190]

Lohr and Jia (1986) performed noiu-elativistic SCF calculations on LaHs using basis sets between minimal and valence double-zeta quality. The molecule was found to have a C3v equilibrium structure with a H-La-H bond angle of 115 , however the inversion barrier for a Dsh transition state was calculated to be only 239 cm . ... [Pg.684]

DiBella et al. (1993) performed SCF, CASSCF and CISD ealculations for LaFs and Lads- A relativistic effective-core potential of Hay and Wadt (1985b) was used for La, whereas F and Cl were treated at the all-electron level. LaFs was found to be slightly pyramidal (F-La-F bond angle 118.5°, inversion barrier 0.04kcal/mol), whereas LaCU was calculated to be planar. The increasing tendency towards a planar geometry in the... [Pg.688]

Inversion barriers, such as that found in ammonia, seem to require basis sets of at least 6-31G quality or better. STO-3G barriers tend to be too large, often by a factor of two, whereas 3-21G barriers are too low. Once again, the performance of the minimal basis proves to be very irregular. If used in a carefully calibrated situation, it can produce results that are as good as calculations requiring orders of magnitude more computer time. But in the absence of demonstrated reliability, it cannot be trusted to provide any more than a qualitative indication of the answer. [Pg.17]

First of all, quantum calculations allow one to predict basicity scales in agreement with experiment provided that the calculations are performed on the preferred conformation of the isolated molecule. If this is not done, a given term within a consistent series may jump from one rank to another as a function of the conformation used for the calculations. The determinant role of preferred conformation on any property (barrier to internal rotation and inversion, dipole moment, first adiabatic ionization potential, acidity and basicity in the gas phase, energy of complexation to BF3, etc.) was clearly demonstrated. We further show the importance of the role of preferred conformation in explaining some of the anomalies in Drago s systematics. [Pg.18]

This chapter assesses the ability of both molecular mechanics and quantum chemical models to correctly assign the lowest-energy conformational arrangements in flexible molecules as well as aceount for energy differences between alternative conformers. It also assesses the performance of different models with regard to the calculation of barriers to single-bond rotation and pyramidal inversion. [Pg.271]

Early Examples of Surface Calculations for Closed-shell Systems.—The first LCAO-MO SCF calculation of a reaction pathway on a potential surface for a reaction between two closed-shell species was performed by Clementi" for the system NHa + HC1 to form NH4CI. The calculation employed contracted sets of GTO s (llf,7p)- [5j,3p] for N, (6s,p) [3s,p for H and (llr,7p)— [5r,4p] for Cl. Since the basis set does not contain any polarizing functions on the N and Q centres, it will not yield results at the Hartree-Fock limit. For example, this basis set predicts a barrier height for the inversion motion in NH3 which is almost twice as large as the experimental value, while as pointed out before, this same barrier is quantitatively accounted for at the Hartree-Fock limit. The HQ molecule was constrained to... [Pg.20]

In this same vein, the synthesis of 25m and 2621) has been attempted by initial formation of the cyclic sulfides, then extrusion of sulfur by irradiation in the presence of triethylphosphite. In both cases the limited sample size precluded formation of the desired cyclophanes (25 and 26) by this photolytic procedure. Variable temperature H NMR studies have been performed on 27 and 28 27 has a barrier to conformational inversion of 12.5 kcal/mole, while 28 has a corresponding barrier of 10.4 kcal/mole. Phane 28 exhibits a shift of the aromatic protons to higher field as compared to 29 the most dramatic shift is observed for H-3, which absorbs at 7.72 ppm for 28 and at 8.37 ppm for 29. This shift has been explained in terms of an approximately syn orientation of the pyridine rings in 28. [Pg.85]


See other pages where Inversion barriers performance is mentioned: [Pg.183]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.1037]    [Pg.618]   


SEARCH



Barrier inversion

© 2024 chempedia.info