Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Intraparticle matrix

The affinity of the polymer-bound catalyst for water and for organic solvent also depends upon the structure of the polymer backbone. Polystyrene is nonpolar and attracts good organic solvents, but without ionic, polyether, or other polar sites, it is completely inactive for catalysis of nucleophilic reactions. The polar sites are necessary to attract reactive anions. If the polymer is hydrophilic, as a dextran, its surface must be made less polar by functionalization with lipophilic groups to permit catalytic activity for most nucleophilic displacement reactions. The % RS and the chemical nature of the polymer backbone affect the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance. The polymer must be able to attract both the reactive anion and the organic substrate into its matrix to catalyze reactions between the two mutually insoluble species. Most polymer-supported phase transfer catalysts are used under conditions where both intrinsic reactivity and intraparticle diffusion affect the observed rates of reaction. The structural variables in the catalyst which control the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance affect both activity and diffusion, and it is often not possible to distinguish clearly between these rate limiting phenomena by variation of active site structure, polymer backbone structure, or % RS. [Pg.57]

We have shown in Ref. [19] that if the systems in question have three levels, one can completely eliminate decoherence and disentanglement by imposing a special symmetry using the appropriate modulation. Thus, even if drastic reduction of all the decoherence matrix elements is not possible, then by using local modulations, one may equate the intraparticle elements, eliminate the interparficle elements, and code the QI in the ground and antisymmetric dark state of the two excited levels, and consequently completely preserve coherence and entanglement. [Pg.208]

In addition, Wei (4) has shown that if intraparticle diffusional effects are significant and if the diffusivities of the reacting species are equal, the A matrix becomes... [Pg.539]

The analysis of intraparticle mass-transfer resistance requires the knowledge of the effective diffusivity Ds of a substrate in an immobilized matrix, such as agarose, agar, or gelatin. Gels are porous... [Pg.63]

The specimen intensity transform X is a type of convolution product of the particle intensity transform Ip and the particle orientation density function ( 1,2). The procedure that we have used to simulate Ip involves firstly the calculation of the intensity transform for an infinite particle, with appropriate allowances for random fluctuations in atomic positions and for matrix scattering. A mapping of Xp is then carried out which includes the effects of finite particle dimensions and of intraparticle lattice disorder, if this is present. A mapping of Is is then obtained from Tp by incorporating the effects of imperfect particle orientation. [Pg.62]

The use of microporous membranes as a chromatography matrix avoids intraparticle diffusional limitations, since their pores, around two orders of magnitude larger than those of conventional resins, are accessed mainly by convection (Figure 12.10). This enables the operation at relatively high flow rates, with relatively low pressure drops. Additionally, membrane adsorbers present better mechanical resistance than gels, with no deformation and bed compaction problems. Also, the systems are usually modular and easy to scale up (Klein, 2000 Bueno and Miranda, 2005). [Pg.322]

In general, as an adsorbate is transported in the internal matrix of adsorbent, there is tendency of adsorbate-adsorbate interaction in the pores and hopping, from site to site, of adsorbed species along the wall of the adsorbent. These phenomena give rise to pore and surface diffusion resistances to intraparticle... [Pg.28]

In the HSDM model, pore diffusion is neglected and it is assumed that surface diffusion is the dominant mechanism of intraparticle mass transfer. The imsteady-state diffusion process within the particle is taken into accoimt by a diffusion process model assuming a constant matrix of Fick diffusivity. The variation of q,- with the distance along the column and the time is governed by the diffusion equation [49-51]... [Pg.764]

The diagonal matrix m specifies the masses of the nuclei. Recall that interparticle potentials, as well as interactions of particles with confining walls that define system volume V. The quahtative nature of the trajectory traced out by the system configuration point. [Pg.55]

The "shell-core" model(13) originally proposed 1n 1974 and later mod1fied(l4,l5) 1s representative of the intraparticle interference models. It postulates that in the dry state a cluster of ca. 0.1 nm 1n radius is shielded from surrounding matrix Ions not incorporated Into clusters by a shell of hydrocarbon chains, Figure 2. The surrounding matrix ions that cannot approach the cluster more closely than the outside of the hydrocarbon shell are attracted to the cluster by dipole-dipole interactions. This mechanism establishes a preferred distance between the cluster and the matrix ions a distance of the order of 2 nm accounts for the spacing of the SAXS ionic peak. [Pg.4]

The characterisation of the soil matrix and, in particular, soil organic matter together with postulated models for intraparticle diffusion. [Pg.9]

In addition, it is important to recognize that catalysis by solids involves diffusion of reactants from fluid bulk to the catalyst surface, as well as diffusion within the solid matrix. The latter invariably occurs simultaneously with the reaction, and the former is usually (but not necessarily rigorously) treated as an independent precursor to it. Thus any analysis of catalysis by solids is based on understanding its action under the physical influence of the microenvironment in which it functions. Catalysis by solids actually occurs on the catalyst surface and constitutes the surface field problem, which is the core of its action. Diffusion of reactant within its matrix is an internal or intraparticle field problem, and its transport from bulk to surface is an external or interphase field problem. [Pg.12]

Joshi et al. (30) proposed reactor models based on the shrinking core mechanism. Since the particles take part in the reaction their role was evaluated based on the residence time distribution. For extremely fine pyrite particles, (< 100 ym), it has been shown (31) that the RTD of the solid and liquid phases can be asstimed to be identical and the RTD of the solid phase is given by the diffusion-sedimentation model. Various rate controlling steps that were considered are (1) gas-liquid mass transfer (2) liquid-solid mass transfer (3) ash diffusion (4) chemical reaction and, (5) intraparticle diffusional resistance (for particles encased in the coal matrix). [Pg.947]


See other pages where Intraparticle matrix is mentioned: [Pg.217]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.1322]    [Pg.5674]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.1804]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.1796]    [Pg.5673]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.1504]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.431]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.56 , Pg.57 , Pg.59 , Pg.61 , Pg.72 ]




SEARCH



Intraparticle

© 2024 chempedia.info