Intermolecular interactions, formation

Occasionally, equilibria between a quinoid and a diradicaloid form of tetraazafulvaleiies of type 77 have been discussed (66AG303 72NKK100 79JOC1241). Based on ESR measurements, only traces of radicals (0.1% at 200°C) could be observed and therefore 77 (Ar = Ph) exists at room temperature predominately in the quinoid structure. Other authors stated that the thermochromism of 77 mainly results from a change in intermolecular interaction, not from biradical formation (84MI1030). 

Solvation and especially hydration are rather complex phenomena and little is known about them. Depending on the kind of molecular groups, atoms or ions interacting with the solvent, one can differ between lyo- or hydrophilic and lyo-or hydrophobic solvation or hydration. Due to these interactions the so-called liquid structure is changed. Therefore it seems to be unavoidable to consider, at least very briefly, the intermolecular interactions and the main features of liquids, especially water structure before dealing with solvation/hydration and their effects on the formation of ordered structures in the colloidal systems mentioned above. 

Several intermolecular interactions have been proposed and discussed as being responsible for the formation of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes in an aqueous solution 6-10). They are... 

The intermolecular interactions stabilise the helices and greatly influence the properties of exopolysaccharides in solution, ie solubility, viscosity and gel-formation. A strong interaction or good-fit between molecules will lead to insolubility, whereas poor interaction will lead to solubility of exopolysaccharides. The interactions between molecules is influenced by the presence of side-chains. For example, cellulose is insoluble but introduction of a three monosaccharide side-chain into the cellulose chain gives the soluble xanthan. Small changes in the structure of the side-chains can alter the molecular interactions and thus properties of the exopolysaccharide. 

Though such data are ambiguous, and sometimes even contradictory [12], they can be rationally explained on the basis of qualitative considerations on intermolecular interactions of a polymer with a filler. Of practical importance is the fact that varying the nature of the dispersion medium and the filler and thus controlling the intensity of net-formation, we can vary the yield stress of filled polymers within wide limits and in different directions. 

For rigid-chain crystallizable polymers, spontaneous transition into the nematic phase is accompanied by crystallization intermolecular interactions should lead to the formation of a three-dimensional ordered crystalline phase. 

In addition to chemical reactions, the isokinetic relationship can be applied to various physical processes accompanied by enthalpy change. Correlations of this kind were found between enthalpies and entropies of solution (20, 83-92), vaporization (86, 91), sublimation (93, 94), desorption (95), and diffusion (96, 97) and between the two parameters characterizing the temperature dependence of thermochromic transitions (98). A kind of isokinetic relationship was claimed even for enthalpy and entropy of pure substances when relative values referred to those at 298° K are used (99). Enthalpies and entropies of intermolecular interaction were correlated for solutions, pure liquids, and crystals (6). Quite generally, for any temperature-dependent physical quantity, the activation parameters can be computed in a formal way, and correlations between them have been observed for dielectric absorption (100) and resistance of semiconductors (101-105) or fluidity (40, 106). On the other hand, the isokinetic relationship seems to hold in reactions of widely different kinds, starting from elementary processes in the gas phase (107) and including recombination reactions in the solid phase (108), polymerization reactions (109), and inorganic complex formation (110-112), up to such biochemical reactions as denaturation of proteins (113) and even such biological processes as hemolysis of erythrocytes (114). 

Amino acid substitutions on the native y52 8sKIpeptide, coiled-coil domain of human fibrin were able to stabilize the coiled-coil formation. These substitutions were targeted to the positions that compose the interface between coiled-coil strands while the solvent-exposed residues were left unperturbed. This strategy aimed at reducing the likelihood of immunogenicity for future in vivo apphcafion of these materials. In contrast to PEG block copolymers with end blocks that are not used for directed assembly, PEG copolymers with coiled-coil protein motives aim to enhance intermolecular interactions and control over the assembly conditions [85, 173]. 

Mulliken [3] presented a classification of electron donor-acceptor complexes based on the extent of intermolecular charge transfer that accompanies complex formation. An outer complex is one in which the intermolecular interaction B- XY is weak and there is little intra- or intermolecular electric charge redistribution, while an inner complex is one in which there is extensive electric charge (electrons or nuclei) redistribution to give [BX] + - -Y . Inner complexes are presumably more strongly bound in general than outer complexes. 

In contrast to the dihalogens, there are only a few spectral studies of complex formation of halocarbon acceptors in solution. Indeed, the appearance of new absorption bands is observed in the tetrabromomethane solutions with diazabicyclooctene [49,50] and with halide anions [5]. The formation of tetrachloromethane complexes with aromatic donors has been suggested without definitive spectral characterization [51,52]. Moreover, recent spectral measurements of the intermolecular interactions of CBr4 or CHBr3 with alkyl-, amino- and methoxy-substituted benzenes and polycyclic aromatic donors reveal the appearance of new absorption bands only in the case of the strongest donors, viz. Act = 380 nm with tetramethyl-p-phenylendiamine (TMPD) and Act = 300 nm with 9,10-dimethoxy-l,4 5,8-... 

The intramolecular Lewis acid-base interaction of type B is of course always in competition with an intermolecular interaction, as indicated by formula C. Again, a bulky group in a-position to X can favor the formation of monomer B. 

---