Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface Transitions

Yet another strength of SNMS is the ability to measure elemental concentrations accurately at interfaces, as illustrated in Figure 8, which shows the results of the measurement of N and O in a Ti thin film on Si. A substantial oxide film has formed on the exposed Ti surface. The interior of the Ti film is free of N and O, but significant amounts of both are observed at the Ti/Si interface. SNMS is as sensitive to O as to N, and both the O and N contents are quantitatively measured in all regions of the structure, including the interface regions. Quantitation at the interface transition between two matrix types is difficult for SIMS due to the matrix dependence of ion yields. [Pg.583]

Schnell, R., Stamm, M. and Creton, C, Mechanical properties of homopolymer interfaces transition from simple pullout to crazing with increasing interfacial width. Macromolecules, 32(10), 3420-3425 (1999). [Pg.241]

The purpose of this chapter is to give a brief introduction to some basic physical objects and concepts that will be referred to throughout this book. Basic elements of these objects are electrolyte solutions, ion-exchange membranes, bulk ion-exchangers, polyelectrolyte solutions, as well as their interfaces—transition layers at their contact. [Pg.1]

For a flat interface or a droplet for which the interface transition zone is small compared with the radius the bending energy is insignificant compared with the purely stretching energy. A microemulsion droplet in this system has a radius of approximately 25 A. The size of the transition zone is certainly not of negligible size in comparison with that value. [Pg.215]

Figure 6 Model for how inhibitors and substrates interact with presenilin. Helical peptides are docking site inhibitors (DSIs) and interact on the outside of the presenilin molecule at the NTF/CTF heterodimeric interface. Transition-state analog inhibitors (TSAs) interact on the inside of the presenilin molecule where the active site resides. The active site, which contains water and two aspartates, is thought to be sequestered away from the hydrophobic environment of the lipid bilayer. These findings have implications for how substrate interacts with the enzyme. The transmembrane domain of the substrate (S) interacts with the docking site and passes either in whole or in part into the active site for proteolysis. Figure 6 Model for how inhibitors and substrates interact with presenilin. Helical peptides are docking site inhibitors (DSIs) and interact on the outside of the presenilin molecule at the NTF/CTF heterodimeric interface. Transition-state analog inhibitors (TSAs) interact on the inside of the presenilin molecule where the active site resides. The active site, which contains water and two aspartates, is thought to be sequestered away from the hydrophobic environment of the lipid bilayer. These findings have implications for how substrate interacts with the enzyme. The transmembrane domain of the substrate (S) interacts with the docking site and passes either in whole or in part into the active site for proteolysis.
The VOF approach allows one to model various interfacial phenomena for example, wall adhesion and surface (or interfacial) tension can be modeled rigorously using this approach. Brackbill et al. (1992) developed a continuous surface force (CSF) model to describe interfacial surface tension. CSF model replaces surface force by a smoothly varying volumetric force acting on all the fluid elements in the interface transition region. For two-phase flows (dispersed or secondary phase is denoted by subscript 2), surface force, Fsf can be written (Brackbill et al., 1992) ... [Pg.92]

The net effects of the immersed boundary technique are that in the interface transition zone the fluid properties change smoothly from the value on one side of the interface to the value on the other side. The artificial interface thickness is fixed as a function of the mesh size applied to provide stability and smoothness, and it does not change during the calculations. Therefore no numerical diffusion is present. The finite thickness also serves to position the interface more accurately on the grid. The surface tension force (normal contribution only) is then calculated estimating the mean curvature based on geometric information obtained from the restructured interface. [Pg.363]

It is conceivable that the presence of ionic impurities in the solution during ice growth provides an alternate or concurrent means of surface relaxation of fast growing ice crystals, as proposed by Workman and Reynolds or perhaps Fletchers oriented quasiliquid interface transition layer alone is the seat of the freezing potential. [Pg.37]

Figure 12 shows typical variable angle measiuements made in a standard XPS instrmnent (39) using Mg K-o x-rays to excite the Si 2p spectrum. The silicon dioxide layer thickness was approximately 9 A as measured by ellipsometry. Ib curve fit the data, a third intermediate silicon oxidation state (SiO) was included. The amplitude of this and the main Si 2p peaks due to SiOx and the substrate were obtained as a function of sampled depth (variable angle) to obtain the inter ce thickness. Ishizaka and Iwata (39) estimated the interface transition region to be 2 to 3 A thick SiO from these data. [Pg.85]

M. Atanasov, C. Daul, J.-L. Barras, L. Benco, and E. Deiss [1999] Polarizahle Continnum Model for Lithium Interface Transitions Between a Liqnid Electrolyte and an Intercalation Electrode. Solid State Ionics 121, 165-174. [Pg.542]

The RR control EOP is designed to estabhsh a basis for isolating systems and controlhng RPV pressure to minimize the off-site release of radioactivity and provide the interface/transition between the site emergency plan and the symptomatic control of RPV, PC and SC parameters. Entry into this procedure is required at radiation release levels requiring declaration of an alert. [Pg.75]

The interface transition time is ri h /D, where h 5 x 10 m. The attachment time ti, at the worst, is reduced to the time required for searching the appropriate place (grain boundary dislocation, etc.) given by (cf/Ds), d being equal to several atomic distances. The detachment time, obviously, is dose to T2 by the order of magnitude. The characteristic time of transfer through the layer is Ax Ax Ax ... [Pg.43]

A special category of components are also interface contact zones and various kinds of interfaces (ITZ - interface transition zone) ... [Pg.137]

This value differed from the "macroscopic" surface tension for each metal, and the difference has been attributed to the effect of the presence of the interface transition layers ... [Pg.374]

Fig. 10.7 Data from a lithium tantalate crystal growth run showing the desired diameter (smooth curve), the measured diameter and the process power (arbitrary units). The run was restarted after 45 h. In addition to the interface transition at point A, which repeats at point D, the minor interface fluctuations at points B and C repeat at points E and F. Fig. 10.7 Data from a lithium tantalate crystal growth run showing the desired diameter (smooth curve), the measured diameter and the process power (arbitrary units). The run was restarted after 45 h. In addition to the interface transition at point A, which repeats at point D, the minor interface fluctuations at points B and C repeat at points E and F.
Fig. 10.8 Diameter data from the run shown in Fig. 10.7 along with rotation-rate data. The interface transitions and fluctuations occur at precisely the same diameters and rotation rates. Fig. 10.8 Diameter data from the run shown in Fig. 10.7 along with rotation-rate data. The interface transitions and fluctuations occur at precisely the same diameters and rotation rates.
Fig. 10.1J A GGG crystal grown using the hybrid control scheme shown in Fig. [10.12]. An interface transition was forced before the crystal reached the final diameter and control was switched over to weight control. Fig. 10.1J A GGG crystal grown using the hybrid control scheme shown in Fig. [10.12]. An interface transition was forced before the crystal reached the final diameter and control was switched over to weight control.

See other pages where Interface Transitions is mentioned: [Pg.117]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.279]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.271 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info