Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface layer thickness

Sample Precursor /mol% Surfactan t /mol% Aging time Porod and Debye Average diameter of colloidal nuclei /nm Average interface layer thickness E ... [Pg.526]

Figure 5. Plots of exp(-2lic/ q )J(q) versus q of G2, which shows the proceeding of the determination of the average interface layer thickness. When a is 1.93nm, e p(-2/3a q )J(4) versus plot is linear, and the value of Ed is 4.84nm. Figure 5. Plots of exp(-2lic/ q )J(q) versus q of G2, which shows the proceeding of the determination of the average interface layer thickness. When a is 1.93nm, e p(-2/3a q )J(4) versus plot is linear, and the value of Ed is 4.84nm.
This intensity can be used to calculate the correlation fiinction (Bl.9.101) and the interface distribution fiinction (B 1.9.102) and to yield the lamellar crystal and amorphous layer thicknesses along the fibre. [Pg.1408]

The preparation of the reflecting silver layers for MBI deserves special attention, since it affects the optical properties of the mirrors. Another important issue is the optical phase change [ ] at the mica/silver interface, which is responsible for a wavelength-dependent shift of all FECOs. The phase change is a fimction of silver layer thickness, T, especially for T < 40 mn [54]. The roughness of the silver layers can also have an effect on the resolution of the distance measurement [59, 60]. [Pg.1735]

Figure B3.6.3. Sketch of the coarse-grained description of a binary blend in contact with a wall, (a) Composition profile at the wall, (b) Effective interaction g(l) between the interface and the wall. The different potentials correspond to complete wettmg, a first-order wetting transition and the non-wet state (from above to below). In case of a second-order transition there is no double-well structure close to the transition, but g(l) exhibits a single minimum which moves to larger distances as the wetting transition temperature is approached from below, (c) Temperature dependence of the thickness / of the enriclnnent layer at the wall. The jump of the layer thickness indicates a first-order wetting transition. In the case of a conthuious transition the layer thickness would diverge continuously upon approaching from below. Figure B3.6.3. Sketch of the coarse-grained description of a binary blend in contact with a wall, (a) Composition profile at the wall, (b) Effective interaction g(l) between the interface and the wall. The different potentials correspond to complete wettmg, a first-order wetting transition and the non-wet state (from above to below). In case of a second-order transition there is no double-well structure close to the transition, but g(l) exhibits a single minimum which moves to larger distances as the wetting transition temperature is approached from below, (c) Temperature dependence of the thickness / of the enriclnnent layer at the wall. The jump of the layer thickness indicates a first-order wetting transition. In the case of a conthuious transition the layer thickness would diverge continuously upon approaching from below.
When the two liquid phases are in relative motion, the mass transfer coefficients in eidrer phase must be related to die dynamical properties of the liquids. The boundary layer thicknesses are related to the Reynolds number, and the diffusive Uansfer to the Schmidt number. Another complication is that such a boundaty cannot in many circumstances be regarded as a simple planar interface, but eddies of material are U ansported to the interface from the bulk of each liquid which change the concenuation profile normal to the interface. In the simple isothermal model there is no need to take account of this fact, but in most indusuial chcumstances the two liquids are not in an isothermal system, but in one in which there is a temperature gradient. The simple stationary mass U ansfer model must therefore be replaced by an eddy mass U ansfer which takes account of this surface replenishment. [Pg.326]

Though a powerfiil technique, Neutron Reflectivity has a number of drawbacks. Two are experimental the necessity to go to a neutron source and, because of the extreme grazing angles, a requirement that the sample be optically flat over at least a 5-cm diameter. Two drawbacks are concerned with data interpretation the reflec-tivity-versus-angle data does not directly give a a depth profile this must be obtained by calculation for an assumed model where layer thickness and interface width are parameters (cf., XRF and VASE determination of film thicknesses. Chapters 6 and 7). The second problem is that roughness at an interface produces the same effect on specular reflection as true interdiffiision. [Pg.646]

Fawcett et a/.317-319 have studied the Hg/EtOH interface in the presence of various anions (BIv, CIO , Cl", Br , I-). The surface activity of the anions has been found to increase in the above order. The double-layer data for Hg/EtOH have been found to be similar to those for MeOH,127,293 with some difference attributable to the bigger size of EtOH molecules. The double-layer thickness has been found to differ from that expected from the real cross section of the solvent molecules. [Pg.59]

If substrate diffusion becomes rate determining, only a small fraction of the film at the film/solution interface will be used. On the other hand, if charge diffusion becomes rate determining, the catalytic reaction can take place only in a film fraction close to the electrode surface. Each of these effects will render parts of the film superfluous, and it is obvious that there is no sense in designing very thick redox films, rather there is an optimal layer thickness to be expected depending on the individual system. [Pg.63]

Fig. 10-18 A schematic of a stagnant boundary-layer gas exchange model. Cg = gas concentration at the liquid side of the interface Q = gas concentration at the base of the stagnant boundary layer Znim = stagnant boundary layer thickness. Fig. 10-18 A schematic of a stagnant boundary-layer gas exchange model. Cg = gas concentration at the liquid side of the interface Q = gas concentration at the base of the stagnant boundary layer Znim = stagnant boundary layer thickness.
For superlattices with small modulation wavelength of several nanometres, the dislocation multiplication cannot occur, and the dislocation activity is demonstrated by the movement of individual dislocations from B layer into A layer by stress. The critical shear stress to move a dislocation from B layer into A layer (cta/b) can be given by the Lehoczky theory equation [108] as shown in Fig. 13. Figure 13 also gives the normalized oq as function of tglb. It can be seen that there is no strength enhancement as t Ab, which corresponds to very small layer thickness (< 1 nm), and the disappearance of interfaces due to the diffusion between layer A and layer B. The increases rapidly with the increase of... [Pg.156]

The interfaces here also have contribution to the hardness. For Samples 3 and 4, there are no obvious interfaces between Layers A and B because the individual layer thickness is so thin that it is hard to form sharp interfaces. It is more like a mixed structure according to the process. For Sample 5, the interfaces are possibly formed due to the increase of Layer A. So the hardness of Samples 3 and 4 is still much lower than monolayer A, but the hardness of Sample 5 is close to the monolayer A. [Pg.203]

X-ray diffraction has been applied to spread monolayers as reviewed by Dutta [67] and Als-Nielsen et al. [68], The structure of heneicosanoic acid on Cu and Ca containing subphases as a function of pH has been reported [69], as well as a detailed study of the ordered phases of behenic acid [70], along with many other smdies. Langmuir-Blod-gett films have also been studied by x-ray diffraction. Some recent studies include LB film structure just after transfer [71], variations in the structure of cadmium stearate LB films with temperature [72], and characterization of the structure of cadmium arachidate LB films [73], X-ray [74,75] and neutron reflectivity [76,77] data on LB films can be used to model the density profile normal to the interface and to obtain values of layer thickness and roughness. [Pg.69]

Several publications have referred to calculating the correct fluid layer thickness for efficient mass transfer and to determine the area of the interface sufficient to build up enough pressure to stabilize the continuous flow of the two phases and to prevent intermixing [8], The first quantity should be below 100 pm the channel... [Pg.580]

Previously, we have proposed that SFG intensity due to interfacial water at quartz/ water interfaces reflects the number of oriented water molecules within the electric double layer and, in turn, the double layer thickness based on the p H dependence of the SFG intensity [10] and a linear relation between the SFG intensity and (ionic strength) [12]. In the case of the Pt/electrolyte solution interface the drop in the potential profile in the vicinity ofelectrode become precipitous as the electrode becomes more highly charged. Thus, the ordered water layer in the vicinity of the electrode surface becomes thiimer as the electrode is more highly charged. Since the number of ordered water molecules becomes smaller, the SFG intensity should become weaker at potentials away from the pzc. This is contrary to the experimental result. [Pg.81]

Figure 4.3 Schematic diagram of the electrochemical metal—aqueous interface, with the electrode, inner layer, diffuse layer, outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), and inner-layer thickness Xji indicated. Figure 4.3 Schematic diagram of the electrochemical metal—aqueous interface, with the electrode, inner layer, diffuse layer, outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), and inner-layer thickness Xji indicated.
Since natural Au consists solely of Au, the interface-selective enrichment technique cannot be applied in Au studies. The absorber thickness for Au is required to be large and therefore multilayered samples of Au layers/3r/ metal layers have to be prepared. The spectra for Au/Fe with varying Au-layer thickness are shown in Fig. 7.83 [437]. The results were interpreted as follows large magnetic hyperfine fields at Au sites exist only within two monolayers at the interface region, which are supposed to be induced by direct coupling with anti-ferromagnetically oriented Fe 3d atoms. [Pg.365]


See other pages where Interface layer thickness is mentioned: [Pg.207]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.980]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.179]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.523 ]




SEARCH



Interface layer

Layer thickness

Thick layers

© 2024 chempedia.info