Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interface irreversible

In measuring a G/L, G/S or I7S isotherm. Adsorption shows how to calculate mono- or multilayer adsorption.. .the structure of an adsorbed layer...the kinetics of each process--.changes in free energy of surface.,. and exact isotherm equations, and discusses the late.st advances in...rarc-gas adsorption... supercritical region isotherms...hydrophobic solid—water interfaces...irreversible panicle adsorption.-.and adsorption surface complexation. [Pg.879]

As discussed later, the reaction-enhancement factor ( ) will be large for all extremely fast pseudo-first-order reac tions and will be large tor extremely fast second-order irreversible reaction systems in which there is a sufficiently large excess of liquid-phase reagent. When the rate of an extremely fast second-order irreversible reaction system A -t-VB produc ts is limited by the availabihty of the liquid-phase reagent B, then the reac tion-enhancement factor may be estimated by the formula ( ) = 1 -t- B /VCj. In systems for which this formula is applicable, it can be shown that the interface concentration yj will be equal to zero whenever the ratio k yV/k B is less than or equal to unity. [Pg.1363]

Figure 14-10 illustrates the gas-film and liquid-film concentration profiles one might find in an extremely fast (gas-phase mass-transfer limited) second-order irreversible reaction system. The solid curve for reagent B represents the case in which there is a large excess of bulk-liquid reagent B. The dashed curve in Fig. 14-10 represents the case in which the bulk concentration B is not sufficiently large to prevent the depletion of B near the liquid interface and for which the equation ( ) = I -t- B /vCj is applicable. [Pg.1363]

The following assumptions were made (1) The gas bubbles are evenly distributed throughout the liquid phase and have constant radius and composition (2) the concentration of the gas-liquid interface is constant and equal to C (3) no gross variations occur in liquid composition throughout the vessel and (4) the gas is sparingly soluble, and, in the case of a chemical reaction, it is removed by a first-order irreversible reaction with respect to the dissolving gas. [Pg.354]

Show that in steady-state diffusion through a film of liquid, accompanied by a first-order irreversible reaction, the concentration of solute in the film at depth r below the interface is given by ... [Pg.854]

The reason for the exponential increase in the electron transfer rate with increasing electrode potential at the ZnO/electrolyte interface must be further explored. A possible explanation is provided in a recent study on water photoelectrolysis which describes the mechanism of water oxidation to molecular oxygen as one of strong molecular interaction with nonisoenergetic electron transfer subject to irreversible thermodynamics.48 Under such conditions, the rate of electron transfer will depend on the thermodynamic force in the semiconductor/electrolyte interface to... [Pg.512]

Many organic electrode processes require the adsorption of the electroactive species at the electrode surface before the electron transfer can occur. This adsorption may take the form of physical or reversible chemical adsorption, as has been commonly observed at a mercury/water interface, or it may take the form of irreversible, dissociative chemical adsorption where bond fracture occurs during the adsorption process and often leads to the complete destruction of the molecule. This latter t q)e of adsorption is particularly prevalent at metals in the platinum group and accounts for their activity as heterogeneous catalysts and as... [Pg.165]

A similar procedure has been used to cathodically deposit lead telluride, PbTe, onto n-Si(lOO) wafers from an acidic electrolyte containing Pb(ll) and Te(IV) species at ambient conditions [106], Rock salt PbTe particles with size from 80 to 180 nm were obtained, distributed randomly on the Si substrate. The mechanism of PbTe nucleation was considered to involve OPD of 3D islands of tellurium followed by lead UPD. The barrier for anodic current formed at the n-Si/PbTe interface rendered the deposition of PbTe irreversible, although high-efficiency photooxidation... [Pg.179]

The surface actlve/surface inactive difference between p-polarlsed/ s-polarised radiation has enabled an alternative modulation technique, polarisation modulation, to be developed (15,16). In electrochemical applications, it allows surface specificity to be achieved whilst working at fixed potential and without electrochemical modulation of the interface. It can be implemented either on EMIRS or on SNIFTIRS spectrometers and can be very valuable in dealing with electrochemically irreversible systems however, the achievable sensitivity falls well short of that obtained with electrochemical modulation. It should also be noted that its "surface specificity" is not truly surface but extends out into the electrolyte with decreasing specificity to about half a wavelength. [Pg.552]

FIG. 25 Typical DPSC data for the oxidation of 10 mM bromide to bromine (forward step upper solid curve) and the collection of electrogenerated Br2 (reverse step lower solid curve) at a 25 pm diameter disk UME in aqueous 0.5 M sulfuric acid, at a distance of 2.8 pm from the interface with DCE. The period of the initial (generation) potential step was 10 ms. The upper dashed line is the theoretical response for the forward step at the defined tip-interface separation, with a diffusion coefficient for Br of 1.8 x 10 cm s . The remaining dashed lines are the reverse transients for irreversible transfer of Br2 (diffusion coefficient 9.4 x 10 cm s ) with various interfacial first-order rate constants, k, marked on the plot. (Reprinted from Ref. 34. Copyright 1997 American Chemical Society.)... [Pg.324]

M sulfuric acid to air [34]. As discussed above, for the aqueous-DCE interface, the rate of this irreversible transfer process (with the air phase acting as a sink) was limited only by diffusion of Bt2 in the aqueous phase. A lower limit for the interfacial transfer rate constant of 0.5 cm s was found [34]. [Pg.325]

The present chapter will cover detailed studies of kinetic parameters of several reversible, quasi-reversible, and irreversible reactions accompanied by either single-electron charge transfer or multiple-electrons charge transfer. To evaluate the kinetic parameters for each step of electron charge transfer in any multistep reaction, the suitably developed and modified theory of faradaic rectification will be discussed. The results reported relate to the reactions at redox couple/metal, metal ion/metal, and metal ion/mercury interfaces in the audio and higher frequency ranges. The zero-point method has also been applied to some multiple-electron charge transfer reactions and, wheresoever possible, these results have been incorporated. Other related methods and applications will also be treated. [Pg.178]

This redox couple has been studied in H2S04 and tartaric acid at the dropping mercury interface by Delahay et al.u They only reported the value of a for the reaction. This system is only stable when the concentration of Ti3+ is 10 to 20 times higher than that of Ti4+. The AE / V versus w l/2 plots for this reaction in 1.0 N HC1 are shown in Fig. 10 and the kinetic parameters60 are given in Table 3. The value of a is 0.49 and k°a = 5.56 x 10 4cm/s. The reaction appears to be irreversible. [Pg.208]

The irreversible capacity results from formation of a surface-electrolyte interface (SEI) layer, and is believed to be caused by decomposition of the electrolyte on the surface of active material during few first charge cycles [3-5]. The values of irreversible capacity and the SEI are functions of the type of active material and the electrolyte. Also, the safety issue, which is believed to be associated with stability of SEI, has been identified as a major parameter in the equation [6-7]. The contribution of the negative electrode to the thermal runaway is believed to be related to the nature and also to the surface area of the active material [8-9]. [Pg.231]

Adsorption of the polymer molecule causes a reduction of its conformational entropy (Norde 2003b). Flence, adsorption takes place only if the loss in conformational entropy is compensated by sufficient favorable interactions between polymer segments and the interface. Because the polymer molecule attaches with many segments at the interface, it adsorbs tenaciously with a very high affinity, even if the interaction of the individual segments with the interface is rather weak. The high affinity manifests itself by the adsorption being irreversible with respect to variations of the polymer concentration in solution. [Pg.101]

Reaction (52) occurs at the gradient interface of the bolus addition until local Hb(02) concentrations have been reduced, at which point additional NO reduces the iron(III) to iron(II) which can further react with free NO to form Hb(NO). The validity of this mechanism was verified by the observation that addition of CN- ion, which binds irreversibly to metHb to form metHb(CN), significantly attenuated the formation of Hb(NO) in both cell-free Hb and RBC. Mathematical models used to simulate bolus addition of NO to cell-free Hb and RBC were compatible with the experimental results (147). In the above experiments, SNO-Hb was a minor reaction product and was formed even in the presence of 10 mM CN, suggesting that RSNO formation does not occur as a result of (hydrolyzed) NO+ formation during metHb reduction. However, formation of SNO-Hb was not detectable when NO was added as a bolus injection to RBC or through thermal decomposition of DEA/NO in cell free Hb (DEA/NO = 2-(A/ A/ diethylamino)diazenolate). SNO-Hb was observed... [Pg.244]

The response current extremely decreased in the potential range above 0.6V probably due to an irreversible inactivation of FDH. The possible reasons for the inactivation at higher potentials might be (1) conformational change of FDH in such a manner as the enzyme loses its prosthetic group PQQ, and (2) a drastic change in pH of the molecular interface that causes the enzyme inactivated. [Pg.355]


See other pages where Interface irreversible is mentioned: [Pg.17]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.911]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.1005]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.676]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.62 ]




SEARCH



Reversible and Irreversible Interfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info