Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interactions microwave frequency

Hyperfine interactions likewise produce characteristic inflections in the derivative curve. Anisotropic hyperfine coupling is usually accompanied by anisotropic g values and as a result, the powder spectra are often quite complex. Typical powder spectra for paramagnetic species having one nucleus with / = are shown in Fig. 16. An unambiguous analysis of the more complex experimental spectra often requires the use of two microwave frequencies and a variation in the nuclear isotopes. The latter technique is illustrated by a comparison of the spectra for 14N02 and 15N02 on MgO as shown in Fig. 17. [Pg.294]

FIGURE 2.2 Resolution may increase with increasing frequency. A two-line EPR absorption spectrum is given at three different microwave frequencies. The line splitting (and also the line position) is caused by an interaction that is linear in the frequency the linewidth is independent of the frequency. This is a theoretical limit of maximal resolution enhancement by frequency increase. In practical cases the enhancement is usually less in some cases there is no enhancement at all. [Pg.13]

What would happen if we were to lower the microwave frequency from X-band to L-band (1 GHz). The Zeeman term for g 2.2 (an average value for copper) would correspond to a held of circa 325 gauss at 1 GHz, and so the two interactions S B and S I would be of comparable magnitude. In such situations the perturbation expressions become extremely complicated and lose all practical significance. [Pg.79]

Another experiment to recognize interaction is based on its independence of the microwave frequency. If we increase the frequency, then the Zeeman interaction will gain relative importance, and the shape of the spectra should simplify. Experimentally, this may turn out to be a difficult approach due to the rapidly... [Pg.187]

The bottom line quantitative distance data are hard to get from dipolar interaction data, but qualitative or topological information can be obtained. It is usually helpful to study spectra from intermediate redox-titration samples and/or spectra taken at different microwave frequencies. [Pg.188]

Knowledge of complex permittivities of appropriate electrolyte solutions is useful in assessing interactions of microwave radiation with biological tissues. A full study and analysis of complex permittivities of sodium chloride solutions as a function of concentration, temperature, and microwave frequency (207) has laid the foundations for a similar investigation of calcium salt solutions. [Pg.273]

Recently, hf structure associated with the copper signal of cytochrome c oxidase has been reported by Frondsz et al.210 which used octave bandwidth S-band EPR spectroscopy (2-4 GHz). The observed structure has been attributed to copper hfs and to an additional magnetic interaction. Data obtained from powder simulation of the EPR spectra at 2.62 GHz and 3.78 GHz are collected in Table 12.2. In a subsequent paper Frondsz and Hyde211 have shown that in S-band EPR spectra of copper complexes in frozen solutions, improved spectral resolution can be achieved. This new technique, which allows a proper selection of the microwave frequency between 2 and 4 GHz, is therefore recommended for studying powder EPR spectra of these types of compounds. [Pg.80]

The combined effects of the dipolar and exchange interactions produce a complex frequency-dependent EPR spectrum, which can however be analysed by performing numerical simulations of spectra recorded at different microwave frequencies. When centre A is a polynuclear centre, the value of its total spin Sa = S, is determined by the strong exchange coupling between the local spins S, of the various metal sites. In this case, the interactions between A and B consist of the summation of the spin-spin interactions between Sb and all the local spins S, (Scheme II). The quantitative analysis of these interactions can therefore yield the relative arrangement of centres A and B as well as information about the coupling within centre A. [Pg.157]

Beyond the binary systems. Spectroscopic signatures arising from more than just two interacting atoms or molecules were also discovered in the pioneering days of the collision-induced absorption studies. These involve a variation with pressure of the normalized profiles, a(a>)/n2, which are pressure invariant only in the low-pressure limit. For example, a splitting of induced Q branches was observed that increases with pressure the intercollisional dip. It was explained by van Kranendonk as a correlation of the dipoles induced in subsequent collisions [404]. An interference effect at very low (microwave) frequencies was similarly explained [318]. At densities near the onset of these interference effects, one may try to model these as a three-body, spectral signature , but we will refer to these processes as many-body intercollisional interference effects which they certainly are at low frequencies and also at condensed matter densities. [Pg.12]

Intercollisional interference. We note that at the lowest frequencies the simple proportionality between absorption coefficient and product of gas densities breaks down. Under such conditions, certain many-body interactions affect the observations and modify the shape or intensities of the binary spectra, often quite strikingly. An example is shown in Fig. 3.3, a measurement of the absorption in a neon-xenon mixture in the microwave region, at the fixed frequency of 4.4 cm-1. Because of the frequency-dependent factor of g(v) that falls off to zero frequency as v2, absorption is extremely small at such frequencies, Eq. 3.2. As a consequence, it has generally been necessary to use sensitive resonator techniques for a measurement of the absorption at microwave frequencies... [Pg.68]

We have thus far treated the K (n + 2)s states as having no Stark shifts. While they have no first order Stark shift, they do have a second order shift due to their dipole interaction with the p states, which are removed from the s states by energies large compared to the microwave frequency. The microwave field does not produce appreciable sidebands of the s state since it has no first order Stark shift. However, it does induce a Stark shift to lower energy. Not surprisingly the Stark shift produced by a low frequency microwave field of amplitude E is the same as the second order Stark shift produced by a static field Es/j2, they have the same value of (E2). Careful inspection of Fig. 10.9 reveals that the resonances observed with high microwave powers shift with power. [Pg.178]

Chemicals and the containment materials for chemical reaction do not interact equally with the commonly used microwave frequencies for dielectric heating and consequently selective heating may be achieved. Specifically, it is possible to cool the outside of the vessel with a coolant that is transparent to microwaves (solid C02 or liquid N2) and thereby have cold walls that still allowthe microwave energy to penetrate and heat the reactants, which are microwave active, in the vessel. Also for solid-state reactions contamination from the crucible walls may be minimised. [Pg.19]

In all cases above, the center of the electron s orbit (in the plane of the orbit) must be held within X(= c/oig). A specific scheme for accomplishing this is discussed in Ref. 24. At NBS we have initiated a project along these lines. At first, low order division (n < 10) where uig and fl are both microwave frequencies will be tried. Aside from the practical application discussed here, such an experiment is interesting in terms of the fundamental nonlinear interactions of simple elementary systems. [Pg.939]

Six rotational transitions in the v" = 0 level and three in the v" = 1 level were observed, the microwave frequency spanning the range 29 to 60 GHz. Although 19F hyperfine splittings were expected, the particular transitions necessary to determine the interaction constants were not observable. The experimental results were therefore fitted to the usual effective Hamiltonian,... [Pg.904]


See other pages where Interactions microwave frequency is mentioned: [Pg.341]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.137]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.187 ]




SEARCH



Interactions microwave

© 2024 chempedia.info