Integration, method Laplace transforms

Since the enzyme concentration in the reaction solution does not change significantly during the steady state of the hydrolysis process, Q can be treat as a constant. Equation (6) and Equation (7) can be integrated with Laplace Transform Method (21). The boundary conditions are C, = 0 and Q = 0 at < = 0. Thus, the Laplace Transforms of Equation (6) and Equation (7), respectively, are ... 

Integral-Transform Method A number of integral transforms are used in the solution of differential equations. Only one, the Laplace transform, will be discussed here [for others, see Integral Transforms (Operational Methods) ]. The one-sided Laplace transform indicated by L[f t)] is defined by the equation L[f t)] = /(O dt. It has... 

Equations of Convolution Type The equation u x) = f x) + X K(x — t)u(t) dt is a special case of the linear integral equation of the second land of Volterra type. The integral part is the convolution integral discussed under Integral Transforms (Operational Methods) so the solution can be accomplished by Laplace transforms L[u x)] = E[f x)] + XL[u x)]LIK x)] or... 

Thus the Laplace transformation constitutes a method of integration, and a table of Laplace transforms plays a role in this process that is analogous to a table of... 

These equations can be solved (although not easily) by integration by the method of partial fractions, by matrices, or by Laplace transforms. For the case where [I]o = [P]0 = 0, the concentrations are... 

This equation cannot be integrated directly since the temperature 9 is expressed as a function of two independent variables, distance jc and time t. The method of solution involves transforming the equation so that the Laplace transform of 6 with respect to time is used in place of 9. The equation then involves only the Laplace transform 0 and the distance jc. The Laplace transform of 9 is defined by the relation ... 

These can be solved by classical methods (i.e., eliminate Sout to obtain a second-order ODE in Cout), by Laplace transformation techniques, or by numerical integration. The initial conditions for the washout experiment are that the entire system is full of tracer at unit concentration, Cout = Sout = L Figure 15.7 shows the result of a numerical simulation. The difference between the model curve and that for a normal CSTR is subtle, and would not normally be detected by a washout experiment. The semilog plot in Figure 15.8 clearly shows the two time constants for the system, but the second one emerges at such low values of W t) that it would be missed using experiments of ordinary accuracy. 

This equation is a partial differential equation whose order depends on the exact form of/ and F. Its solution is usually not straightforward and integral transform methods (Laplace or Fourier) are necessary. The method of separation of variables rarely works. Nevertheless, useful information of practical geological importance is apparent in the form taken by this equation. The only density distributions that are time independent must obey... 

This picture is usually known as the heterogeneous scenario. The distribution of relaxation times g (In r) can be obtained from < (t) by means of inverse Laplace transformation methods (see, e.g. [158] and references therein) and for P=0.5 it has an exact analytical form. It is noteworthy that if this scenario is not correct, i.e. if the integral kernel, exp(-t/r), is conceptually inappropriate, g(ln r) becomes physically meaningless. The other extreme picture, the homogeneous scenario, considers that all the particles in the system relax identically but by an intrinsically non-exponential process. 

Equivalently, integration of eqn. (169) with respect to f0 over — to t leads to eqn. (170). Before discussing the solution of eqn. (170) and its physical significance, it is very rewarding to take the Laplace Transform of eqn. (146). Using the standard methods discussed in Chap. 2, Sect. 3.6 and the initial condition (131) together with the simplification t0 = 0 (for convenience), it leads to... 

A third method—solution by Laplace transforms—can be used to derive many of the results already mentioned. It is a powerful method, particularly for complicated problems or those with time-dependent boundary conditions. The difficult part of using the Laplace transform is back-transforming to the desired solution, which usually involves integration on the complex domain. Fortunately, Laplace transform tables and tables of integrals can be used for many problems (Table 5.3). 

When DJuL is found to be large and the tracer response curve is skewed, as in Fig. 2.23b, but without a significant delay, a continuous stirred-tanks in series model (Section 2.3.2), may be found to be more appropriate. The tracer response curve will then resemble one of those in Fig. 2.8 or Fig. 2.9. The variance a2 of such a curve with a mean of tc is related to the number of tanks / by the expression a2 = t2/i (which can be shown for example by the Laplace transform method 7 from the equations set out in Section 2.3.2). Calculations of the mean and variance of an experimental curve can be used to determine either a dispersion coefficient Dl or a number of tanks i. Thus each of the models can be described as a one parameter model , the parameter being DL in the one case and i in the other. It should be noted that the value of i calculated in this way will not necessarily be integral but this can be accommodated in the more mathematically general form of the tanks-in-series model as described by Nauman and Buffham 7 . 

To date, there has been no explicit solution for this problem for p > 3, since the surface concentrations of electroactive species O and R are time dependent and therefore the Superposition Principle cannot be applied (see also Sect. 4.3) [1,5]. In these conditions, a non-explicit integral solution has been deduced using the Laplace transform method (see Appendix H). 

Levin (202) presented a more exact solution of the problem with regard to the determination of the distribution function p(E) of activation energies which does not possess the limitations imposed by Roginskil s method. The method employed the Laplace transform to solve the integral Equation (5). The following transformation was carried out ... 

However, the authors do not claim that these three main strategic lines in company of CETO functions constitute the unique way nor the best path to solve the molecular integral problem directed to find plausible substitutes of GTO functions. Other integration methods to deal with the present discussion can be used and analyzed, for instance Fourier, Laplace or Gauss transform methodology or any other possible choices and techniques available in the modem mathematical panoply. 

If the Laplace transform of a function /(/) is f s), then f(t) is the inverse Laplace transform of f(s). Although an integral inversion formula can be used to obtain the inverse Laplace transform, in most cases it proves to be too complicated. Instead, a transform table (1), is used to find the image function f f). For more complicated functions, approximate methods are available. In many cases the inverse of a ratio of two polynomials must be... 

Once the Laplace transform u(x,s) of the temperature () (x, /,) which fits the initial and boundary conditions has been found, the back-transformation or so-called inverse transformation must be carried out. The easiest method for this is to use a table of correspondences, for example Table 2.3, from which the desired temperature distribution can be simply read off. However frequently u(x,s) is not present in such a table. In these cases the Laplace transformation theory gives an inversion theorem which can be used to find the required solution. The temperature distribution appears as a complex integral which can be evaluated using Cauchy s theorem. The required temperature distribution is yielded as an infinite series of exponential functions fading with time. We will not deal with the application of the inversion theorem, and so limit ourselves to cases where the inverse transformation is possible using the correspondence tables. Applications of... 

First order series/parallel chemical reactions and process control models are usually represented by a linear system of coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Single first order equations can be integrated by classical methods (Rice and Do, 1995). However, solving more than two coupled ODEs by hand is difficult and often involves tedious algebra. In this chapter, we describe how one can arrive at the analytical solution for linear first order ODEs using Maple, the matrix exponential, and Laplace transformations. 

The objective of this study is to develop an analytical model for a soil column s response to a sinusoidally varying tracer loading function by applying the familiar Laplace transform method in which the convolution integral is used to obtain the inverse transformation. The solution methodology will use Laplace transforms and their inverses that are available in most introductory texts on Laplace transforms to develop both the quasi steady-state and unsteady-state solutions. Applications of the solutions will be listed and explained. 

The integrals in Eq. [12] are not tabulated in widely used mathematical ref erences (Petit Bois, 1961, Abramowitz Stegun, 1965 Gradshteyn Ryzhik, 1980, p. 128-129). They appear to present an insurmountable difficulty to solution of the problem of describing the tracer concentration in a soil column due to a sinusoidal loading boundary concentration by applying the Laplace transform method with the readily applied convolution rule. 

---