Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Infinite bonds, description

Although the adiabatic connection formula of Eq. (8) justifies a certain amount of Hartree-Fock mixing, there are situations in which a should vanish. In a spin-restricted description of the molecule Hj at infinite bond length (Sect. 4) the Hartree-Fock or A = 0 hole is equally distributed over both atoms, and is independent of the electron s position. But the hole for any finite A, however small, is entirely localized on the electron s atom, so no amount of Hartree-Fock mixing is acceptable in this case. [Pg.23]

Beyond the gel point, the bonds Issuing from a monomer unit can have finite or Infinite continuation. If the continuation Is finite, the Issuing subtree Is also only finite If the continuation Is Infinite, the unit Is bound via this bond to the "infinite" gel. The classification of bonds with respect to whether they have finite or Infinite continuation enables a relatively detailed statistical description of the gel structure. The probability of finite continuation of a bond Is called the extinction probability. The extinction probability Is obtained In a simple way from the distribution of units In generation g>0. This distribution Is obtained from the distribution of units In the root g-0 (for more details see Ref. 6). [Pg.4]

In this chapter we will show that the tight binding ( ) description of the covalent bond is able to provide a simple and unifying explanation for the above structural trends and behaviour. We will see that the ideas already introduced in chapter 4 on the structures of small molecules may be taken over to these infinite bulk systems. In particular, we will find that the trends in structural stability across the periodic table or within the structure maps can be linked directly to the topology of the local atomic environment through the moments theorem of Ducastelle and Cyrot-Lackmann (1971). [Pg.208]

Slater s bond eigenfunctions constitute one choice (out of an infinite number) of a particular sort of basis function to use in the evaluation of the Hamiltonian and overlap matrix elements. They have come to be called the Heitler-London-Slater-Pauling (HLSP) functions. Physically, they treat each chemical bond as a singlet-coupled pair of electrons. This is the natural extension of the original Heitler-London approach. In addition to Slater, Pauling[12] and Eyring and Kimbal[13] have contributed to the method. Our following description does not follow exactly the discussions of the early workers, but the final results are the same. [Pg.10]

The dissociation of difluorine is a demanding test case used traditionally to benchmark new computational methods. In this regard, the complete failure of the Hartree-Fock method to account for the F2 bond has already been mentioned. Table 1 displays the calculated energies of F2 at a fixed distance of 1.43 A, relative to the separated atoms. Note that at infinite distance, the ionic structures disappear, so that one is left with a pair of singlet-coupled neutral atoms which just corresponds to the Hartree-Fock description of the separated atoms. [Pg.198]

In the previous, fixed-input determination of the IT bond indices this discontinuity in the transition from the decoupled to the coupled descriptions of the molecular fragments prevents an interpretation of the former as the limiting case of the latter, when all external communications of the subsystem in question become infinitely small. In other words, the fixed-and flexible-input approaches generate the mutually exclusive sets of bond indices, which cannot describe this transition in a continuous ("causal") fashion. As we have demonstrated in the decoupled approach of the preceding section, only the overall input normalization equal to the number of the decoupled orbital subsystems gives rise to the full agreement with the accepted chemical intuition. [Pg.16]

The structures of crystalline compounds of B subgroup elements in which the metal forms a small number of stronger bonds can be described in terms of the molecules or ions delineated by the stronger bonds. With the description of NH4HgCl3 as HgCl2 molecules, NH4, and Cl ions, compare the structure of 2 HgO. Nal, which contains infinite zigzag chains like those in orthorhombic HgO embedded in a mixture of Na and 1 ions. Three I neighbours complete a... [Pg.922]


See other pages where Infinite bonds, description is mentioned: [Pg.77]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.860]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.3675]    [Pg.4362]    [Pg.5183]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.109]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]




SEARCH



Bonding description

© 2024 chempedia.info