Infeasible solution

The program gives an infeasible solution (e.g., when penalty functions are used). 

Phase 1. Phase 1 starts with some initial basis B and an initial basic (possibly infeasible) solution (xB,xN) satisfying... 

Select the Show Iteration Results box, click OK in the Solver Options dialog, then click Solve on the Solver Parameter dialog. This causes the simplex solver to stop after each iteration. Because an initial feasible basis is not provided, the simplex method begins with an infeasible solution in phase 1 and proceeds to reduce the sum of infeasibilities sinf in Equation (7.40) as described in Section 7.3. Observe this by selecting Continue after each iteration. The first feasible solution found is shown in Figure 7.6. It has a cost of 3210, with most shipments made from the cheapest source, but with other sources used when the cheapest one runs out of supply. Can you see a way to improve this solution ... 

When there are constraints, GAs face a fundamental difficulty, namely that many crossover or mutation operators rarely yield feasible offspring, even if the parents are feasible. This can lead to a population with an excessive number of infeasible solutions. To alleviate this problem, GAs often include a penalty function in/(see Section 8.4) to measure fitness. A value must be chosen for the penalty weight, however. If this is too small, the original problem of too many infeasible solutions remains, and if it is too large, the search tends to reject points with small infeasibilities, even if they are close to an optimal solution. 

GAMS output Infeasible solution. There are no superbasic variables.) ... 

A key problem that arises in the implementation of Powell s algorithm is due to the linearization that produces a quadratic objective function and linear constraints, which often lead to infeasible solution vectors, X ]. This problem manifests itself in solu-... 

Sometimes, the mathematical formulation of a problem has physically infeasible solutions such solutions must be discarded. 

A good program for nonlinear systems has to allow the introduction of certain variable constraints to prevent infeasible solutions. 

Fuzzy goal programming uses the ideal values as targets and minimizes the maximum normalized distance from the ideal solution for each objective. An ideal solution is the vector of best values of each criterion obtained by optimizing each criterion independently ignoring other criteria. In this example, ideal solution is obtained by minimizing price, lead-time, and quality independently. In most situations, the ideal solution is an infeasible solution since the criteria conflict with one another. 

Penalty function methods are the most popular methods used in the GAs for constrained optimization problems. These methods transform a constrained problem into an unconstrained one by penalizing infeasible solutions. Penalty is imposed by adding to the objective function/(x) a positive quantity to reduce fitness values of such infeasible solutions ... 

However, this form of the equation creates an infeasible solution when the two temperature differences are equal since the energy flux, the overall heat transfer coefficient and heat exchanger area becomes inconsequential. In physical terns, the two temperature differences can be equal. Equation (4) has to be changed so that this possibility was included ... 

The main idea in the development of the algorithm for the nonlinear back-off synthesis method is to use the steady state formulation in order to generate promising control structures that are then evaluated under dynamic conditions. Since the dynamics of the plant can only further restrict the feasible space, when compared to the steady state, dynamic economics caimot be better than the steady state economics (see also Fig. 1). Any structure that is feasible under dynamic conditions (ie[0,T/]) is also feasible at steady state (t=0) since the latter is a subset of the former. However, the converse is not true. That is, a structure that is feasible at steady state can be dynamically infeasible. Those structures that correspond to steady state feasible but dynamically infeasible solutions have to be excluded fi-om the feasible space of the steady state problem in order to obtain the feasible space of the dynamic... 

In contrast to the optimization of average quantities, the LP approach guarantees that all the inequalities in Eq. (1) are satisfied. If the LP cannot find a solution, we get an indication that it is impossible to find a set of parameters that solve all the inequalities in Eq. (1). For example, we may obtain the impossible condition that the contact energy between two ALA residues must be smaller than 5 and at the same time must be larger than 7. Such an infeasible solution is an indicator that the current model is not satisfactory, and more parameters or changes in the functional form are required [31-33]. Hence, the LP approach, which focuses on the tail of the distribution near the native shape, allows us to learn continuously from new constraints and improve further the energy functions, guiding the choice of their functional form. 

Other techniques include sampling, based on Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) (Haider Mahadevan 1999) and work well for small reliability requirements. Nevertheless, as the desired reliability increases, the number of samples must also increase to find at least one infeasible solution. 

After generating the offspring population, the solutions are checked against their feasibility. The infeasible solutions are repaired, for example, taking the value 0 if it is negative. 

Mutation is another important operation in the reproduction process. Random mutation has heen employed in this study because it is easy to use and control (Michalewicz, 1996). However, random mutation may result in infeasible solutions because they may violate the capacity constraints for raw material inventory and productivity in the SC model therefore, after mutation it requires an adjustment process in order to ensure all solutions are feasible. The mutation selection is done universally. Each gene of an offspring solution can be selected with a probability equalling the mutation rate and then perform Eq. (7.3) to do the mutation. 

Unfortunately, hard output constraints can result in infeasible solutions for the optimization problem, especially for large disturbances. Consequently, output constraints are usually expressed as soft constraints involving slack variables Sj (Qin and Badgwell, 2003) ... 

These methods use/( c) as a penalization term when constraints are not met so as to discourage infeasible solutions. One of the most popular families of penalizations is the following ... 

---