INDEX nucleophilic aromatic substitution

Besides the applications of the electrophilicity index mentioned in the review article [40], following recent applications and developments have been observed, including relationship between basicity and nucleophilicity [64], 3D-quantitative structure activity analysis [65], Quantitative Structure-Toxicity Relationship (QSTR) [66], redox potential [67,68], Woodward-Hoffmann rules [69], Michael-type reactions [70], Sn2 reactions [71], multiphilic descriptions [72], etc. Molecular systems include silylenes [73], heterocyclohexanones [74], pyrido-di-indoles [65], bipyridine [75], aromatic and heterocyclic sulfonamides [76], substituted nitrenes and phosphi-nidenes [77], first-row transition metal ions [67], triruthenium ring core structures [78], benzhydryl derivatives [79], multivalent superatoms [80], nitrobenzodifuroxan [70], dialkylpyridinium ions [81], dioxins [82], arsenosugars and thioarsenicals [83], dynamic properties of clusters and nanostructures [84], porphyrin compounds [85-87], and so on. 

If only the electron density of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) is taken into account, an electrophilic attack is said to be regulated by the frontier electron density index (54JCP1433 79FCF1). In nucleophilic substitutions, the aromatic substrate tends to accept an electron pair in the transition state, and so the frontier orbital is taken as the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). In this case, the frontier electron density is assumed to be as the electron distribution that would be present in the LUMO if it were occupied by two electrons. In contrast to arguments based on the charge or 7c-electron densities, both nucleophilic and electrophilic substitution occur preferentially at the atom with the highest electron density within the appropriate frontier orbital, i.e., LUMO or HOMO, respectively. 

---