Independent mesh method

At t = 1, the values of x should yield the difficult solution F(x) = 0. This technique resembles the relaxation method, but only requires modifying the independent MESH functions to get the derivatives with respect to one term t. This is a purely mathematical approach and Ellis et al. (78) state that it can give negative flow rates at intermediate values of t, something that if-value and enthalpy routines may not tolerate. An alternative is a homotopy function that is rooted in the MESH equations themselves. 

In some cases a variable can be independent and in others the same variable can be dependent, but the usual independent variables are pressure, temperature, and flow rate or concentration of a feed. We cannot provide examples for all of these criteria, but have selected a few to show how they mesh with the optimization methods described in earlier chapters and mathematical models listed in Table 14.1. 

Method 625 for Semivolatiles. This method is a solvent extraction method intended to determine as many of the organic semivolatile priority pollutants as possible. To accomplish this, the sample is serially extracted, first at a pH greater than 11 and then at pH 2. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the procedure. The two fractions, base-neutrals and acids, are independently determined by using two separate GC columns. The base-neutrals are determined on a 1.8-m X 2-mm i.d. glass column packed with Supelcoport (100-120 mesh) coated with 3%... 

The energy balances are not solved in the same manner as the component or total material balances. With some solution methods, they are simultaneously solved with other MESH equations to get the independent cc umn variables in others they are used in a more limited manner to get a new set of total flow rates or stage temperatures. 

Each MESH equation is dependent on more than one MESH variable. The MESH equations are represented as a set of functions, ft, f2, ..., ft, with a corresponding set of independent variables, r1( xn. The Newton-Raphson method is a matrix method in which the partial derivatives or change of each function with respect to each vain-able are placed in a square n x n matrix called the Jacobian. 

Produced from the manipulation of the Jacobian are the changes in the variables, i,e., the Ax vector. The variables for the next trial are calculated from x + = x + s Ax (i.e,, . + T = xlk + sk Ajc1jA, etc,). The s scalar is generated to ensure that the norm of functions improve between trial k + 1 and trial k. Usually, s = 1 but may have to be smaller on some trials. The Newton-Raphson method assumes that the curves of the independent functions are close to linear and the slopes will point toward the answers. The MESH equations can be far from linear and the full predicted steps, Ax, can take the next trial well off the curves. The s scaler helps give an improved step search or prevente overstepping the solution. Holland (8) and Broyden (119) present formulas for getting s. ... 

The Naphtali-Sandholm (42) method. This method chooses the stage temperatures and component vapor and liquid rates from the MESH variables as the independent variables of the Newton-Raphson calcu-... 

Vickery and Taylor (81) used a Naphtali-Sandholm method containing all of the MESH equations and variables [M2C + 3) equations] with the variables represented by x. H is the Jacobian from the Naphtali-Sandholm method solution of the known problem, G(x) = 0, This is numerically integrated from t = 0 to t - 1, finding a H, at each Step and updating H when the solution is reached at each step, With Hj. and H, known, dxjdt is solved, and with step size t, a new set of values for the independent variables x is found by Euler s rule... 

A commonly used network analysis method is loop and mesh analysis, which is generally based on KVL. As defined previously, loop analysis refers to the general method of current analysis for both planar and non-planar networks, whereas mesh analysis is reserved for the analysis of planar networks. In loop or mesh analysis, the circulating currents are selected as the unknowns, and a circulating current is assigned to each independent loop or mesh of the network. Then a series of equations can be formed according to KVL. 

A computational approach of a very different nature, usually referred to as the boundary value method , introduces a multidimensional finite-difference mesh to directly solve the partial differential equations of reactive scattering This approach has been taken by Diestler and McKoy (1968) in work related to a previous one by Mortensen and Pitzer (1962). While the second authors used an iterative procedure to impose the physical boundary conditions of scattering, the more recent work constructs the wavefunction as a linear combination of independent functions Xj which satisfy the scattering equation for arbitrarily chosen boundary conditions. 

The efficiency of the automotive proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell is dependent on many factors, one of which is the humidification of the inlet air. If the inlet air is not sufficiently humid (saturated), then the stack can develop dry spots in the membrane and efficiency and voltage will drop. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that humid inlet air at the proper elevated temperature is supplied to the stack. Current methods involve utilizing a spray nozzle to atomize water droplets onto a cloth or wire mesh substrate. As the ambient inlet air passes over the cloth it picks up moisture however, the relative humidity drops as the air is heated in the fuel cell. If heat could be supplied to the water efficiently, the system would become independent of the ambient conditions, the inlet air could become more humid at the proper temperatures, and the overall stack could maintain a high level of efficiency. Previous work with power electronic heat sinks and automotive radiators has demonstrated the high efficiency of carbon foam for heat transfer. Utilizing the carbon foam in the PEM fuel cell may reduce the inlet air humidification problems. 

---