Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Impermeable constraint

Serious efforts have been made to explain the atypical lithium transport behavior using modified diffusion control models. In these models the boundary conditions -that is, "real potentiostatic constraint at the electrode/electrolyte interface and impermeable constraint at the back of the electrode - remain valid, while lithium transport is strongly influenced by, for example (i) the geometry of the electrode surface [53-55] (ii) growth of a new phase in the electrode [56-63] and (iii) the electric field through the electrode [48, 56]. [Pg.151]

A device consisting of an array of frustum-shaped cells that contain a drug dispersed in a permeable matrix is shown to obey zero-order release kinetics following an initial burst phase. Geometric shapes of dissolving solids or diffusion systems and the constraints of impermeable barriers influence mass transport and can be exploited as in the constant release wedge- or hemispheric-shaped devices. [Pg.324]

If the electrode material is assumed to be homogeneous, then the concentration gradient of lithium through the electrode is the only factor that drives lithium transport. Hence, lithium will enter/leave the planar electrode only at the electrode/ electrolyte interface, and cannot penetrate into the back of the electrode. Under such an impermeable (impenetrable) constraint, the electric current (I) can be expressed by Equation (5.18) during the initial stage of diffusion, and by Equation (5.19) during the later stage [45] ... [Pg.150]

An important partition function can be derived by starting from Q (T, V, N) and replacing the constant variable AT by fi. To do that, we start with the canonical ensemble and replace the impermeable boundaries by permeable boundaries. The new ensemble is referred to as the grand ensemble or the T, V, fi ensemble. Note that the volume of each system is still constant. However, by removing the constraint on constant N, we permit fluctuations in the number of particles. We know from thermodynamics that a pair of systems between which there exists a free exchange of particles at equilibrium with respect to material flow is characterized by a constant chemical potential fi. The variable N can now attain any value with the probability distribution... [Pg.7]

Hence the velocity and pressure distributions at 0(1) can be completely determined within the core region (away from the end walls), to within an arbitrary constant for p 0). In fact, the flow is a simple unidirectional flow, as is appropriate for traction-driven flow between two plane surfaces. The turning flow that must occur near the ends of the cavity influences the core flow only in the sense that the presence of impermeable end walls requires a pressure gradient in the opposite direction to the boundary motion in order to satisfy the zero-mass-flux constraint. But now, a remarkable feature of the domain perturbation procedure is that we can use our knowledge of the unidirectional flow that is appropriate for an undeformed interface at 0(1) to directly determine the 0(5) contribution to the interface shape function in (6-159a) without having to determine any other feature of the solution at 0(5). [Pg.399]

Diffusion provides another good example. A small impermeable sack containing a solute is placed in an infinite container full of solvent. At t = 0 the sack is broken (the constraint is removed) and the solute diffuses through the solvent until a new state of equilibrium is reached in which the solute is uniformly distributed throughout the solution. The property that is measured is the concentration of solute as a function of position and time. Initially the solute is found only in the sack so that the sack geometry defines the initial concentration distribution 0. This experiment is completely described by the diffusion equation the solution of which gives4... [Pg.227]

We must choose a system capable of having states other than the stable equilibrium state, preferably an infinite number of them, and the simplest possible one is probably the gas and piston arrangement previously used in Chapter 3 and repeated in Figure 5.2. The exterior wall is impermeable to energy and rigid, so the system is of constant U and V. The piston is movable and can be locked in any position. It is impermeable to the gas but it conducts heat so that the two sides are at the same temperature. According to our definition of S, the equilibrium position of the piston (that is, when the system has no additional constraints and the piston is free to move) is one of maximum entropy for the system, and any other position has lower entropy. If the two sides have equal amounts of the same gas, the curve illustrating this will be symmetrical. [Pg.96]

We assume now that the walls of the systems are impermeable to entropy and matter. Further we consider a state of equilibrium. This assumption implies the constraints dS i = 0, dS 2 = 0, d i = 0, d 2 = 0. For this reason we may express the total energy merely as a function of the volumes, i.e.. [Pg.100]

Red cell deformation takes place under two important constraints fixed surface area and fixed volume. The constraint of fixed volume arises from the impermeability of the membrane to cations. Even though the membrane is highly permeable to water, the inability of salts to cross the membrane prevents significant water loss because of the requirement for colloidal osmotic equilibrium [Lew and Bookchin, 1986). The constraint of fixed surface area arises from the large resistance of bilayer membranes to changes in area per molecule [Needham and Nunn, 1990]. These two constraints place strict limits on the kinds of deformations that the cell can undergo and the size of the aperture that the cell can negotiate. Thus, a major determinant of red cell deformability is its ratio of surface area to volume. One measure of this parameter is the sphericity, defined as the dimensionless ratio of the two-thirds power of the cell volume to the cell area times a constant that makes its maximum value 1.0 ... [Pg.1020]

Mass transport of the dosed component oxygen from the membrane to the center of the catalyst bed is studied in this section. The boundary conditions for the component mass balances were given in Table 5.3. In setting up these BCs it was assumed that the membrane walls are impermeable for every component except oxygen and an inert gas (nitrogen). This constraint is valid for membrane materials with low permeability and dominating convective transport through the membrane. [Pg.127]


See other pages where Impermeable constraint is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.492]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.553]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.696]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.258 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.258 ]




SEARCH



Impermeability

© 2024 chempedia.info